• Siresly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a fair observation and very agreeable when the intent is to focus deserved ire on the primary element responsible for the wretched state of the world. But this could also be used to absolve oneself of inaction, deny any personal responsibility, to justify exhibiting similar selfish behavior oneself, or to feel smug about demoralizing or shitting on people who seek to improve society somewhat.

    As the meme itself implies, the exploitation class is the problem that needs to be addressed. No need for anyone else to catch strays.

    • PNW clouds@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t see it as a way to justify inaction. I see it as a way to be forgiving of myself if I mess up sometimes.

      Example: in the worst of my grief, I threw away some recyclables because I just couldn’t wash them out properly. It took everything just to eat.

      I didn’t pile guilt on myself over it. I recycle 99% of the time, I never litter. I have to check my pockets for random trash before doing laundry.

      Utility companies, corporations, and rich people are not cleaning up after themselves and their inaction almost negates everything me and everyone I personally know can possibly do.

      Knowing they are dumping faster than I can shovel doesn’t mean I stop shoveling. I still want and actively work to leave this place better than I found it.

      Those 91 jets just mean I don’t feel overwhelming guilt when I fail. I just try to do better next time.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Do you think they feel “overwhelming guilt” about those jets?

        The idea is to blame you for all the plastic shit they have forced you to buy because you need to eat and wipe your ass and clean your floor.

        They don’t care what bin you put that shit in. It all goes to the same place anyway since they have admitted recycling is a scam and has been for the last 40 years.

        It’s like conserving water. In the 80s, when there were “droughts” in California, they told people not to flush their toilets. 98% of water is used by commercial agriculture. THEY should be more efficient about their water use. We are subsidizing them. And they export a ton of this shit. Like almonds. Which take a ton of water to grow. (Spoiler alert on where they export that to…)

        You ever see those public trash cans with like different holes for landfill and recycle, and then see underneath that it all goes into the same bag?

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Utility companies, corporations, and rich people are not cleaning up after themselves and their inaction almost negates everything me and everyone I personally know can possibly do.

        There’s no almost about it. On an individual level, anything you and I do to recycle is dwarfed by the callous usage of resources by corporations.

        You and I are out here doing our best to recycle the vast majority of our plastic waste when one of the local factories throws away more than a month’s worth of your plastic refuse every shift when they throw away the plastic wrapping on just supply pallets. They may recycle the cardboard, but so much pallet shrink wrap would get thrown away at receiving and a shit ton more applied at shipping.

        I fucking hated working for one of the local places and just watched all the plastic waste build up every shift. I still recycle because something is better than nothing, but it’s still infuriating to have corpos guilt us about this shit while they do fuck all about it themselves.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s not attacking the girl or suggesting she should stop. She’s doing the right thing. It’s attacking the rich psychopaths ruining the environment in ways that are orders or magnitude greater than my life will ever do.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem is interpretation. You read it one way because of your life context and frame of mind. Many others will have a different interpretation.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We need collectively to be pinching pennies ecologically, but doing so on drinks at the roulette table is not really responsibility; it’s delusional cope.

      Until we pry ourselves away from that civilizational casino, possibly with guillotines, nothing else really matters.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It really just highlights the growing injustice in the world and that our problems are growing too severe to solve them with personal responsibility. We need to make billionaires illegal or things with keep spiraling downwards.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 months ago

    My Air conditioner tells me to conserve energy for the environment, when it gets warm out. Meanwhile the mall behind my house runs the lights and AC 24/7 even when closed

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m kinda to the point where it feels like nothing us normies do will change anything so until billionaires are illegal it’s basically like fuck it.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      My nest app tells me the same, while there’s a strip mall of 8 stores with neon bright signs that stay on 24/7 directly across from my apt balcony. I’d have a great view of the mountains in the AC but nah the fuckin tanning salon deserves that juice

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        A while ago, when the energy crisis was in full swing, I emailed a corporation that owns a large office building in town, that’s completely covered with a light display (basically tower-scale christmas lights) that they should please turn off that energy waster.

        Their response was like “Our lighting is eco-friendly, because once a month we turn it green to show our commitment to green energy, and that offsets all the energy consumption.”

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Slightly off topic, but I find it goddamn funny that someone like MrBeast made a bootleg copy of squid game on his YouTube channel, considering the entire point of the programme was to show that billionaires will do whatever evil they please and get away without any single negative consequence. Not that the premise was too subtle, considering that the villains use humans as literal footrests. How someone can be this tone deaf or uncaring is beyond my understanding.

    Edit: I just remembered it’s the guy selling kids highly processed food with rotten cheese on top. So, considering that, I’m not too surprised. Just slightly.

  • Ougie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wait till you hear how much pollution the army creates when they decide to mobilize an entire camp for no reason

  • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    I get the feeling this is somehow also criticizing this particular woman. Someone did a small good thing, while others do bad things on a very large scale. What a naive idiot! Not a very helpful sentiment. One needs to look up for moral guidance, not down.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s not the woman that’s being criticized, it’s the people claiming that the ones not doing that bear all the blame for damaging the environment.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        except it reads as if its all useless and dumb. I don’t understand how people don’t see this as that?

        It’s not created to get people to be more on board with climate change policy. It’s meant to point out that we just shouldn’t do any of it.

        • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          It does read useless but not necessarily dumb, just in vain. For me it acknowledges that we should put a lot more responsibility for the rich and powerful undermining our collective effort.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah, no amount of propaganda is going to get me to stop understanding math. Nothing I do as an individual will ever be even a molecule in a drop in a bucket.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I fucking can’t with this fucking shit. Like why the fuck do I need to explain to you how everyone doing something makes the impact. Nobody is expecting you to do it alone. Like why do you place that burden to explain something like that on others. An absolute tragedy you have a brain that produces a thought like this. I’m just fucking embarrassed for your parents honestly.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              You don’t need to explain anything, I fully understand the angle. It’s just bullshit and you bought the lie.

              Every single American could stop using plastic straws tomorrow, and the outcome would be negligible compared to what would happen if a single fossil fuel corporation shut down.

              Any real, viable solution to climate change necessarily begins with corporate regulation. Their effect on the environment is several orders of magnitude higher than any other group. To the point where the damage they do completely overshadows any possible good that individual humans could ever do.

              • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Plastic straws isn’t to fix climate change. It was a solution to help reduce these straws from ending up in the environment and causing impacts to marine life. It did accomplish a reduction in risk to marine life and all it took was being an adult and buying your own reusable straw.

                You bought the lie

                You’re right about corporations need to make the change. But your wrong about the rest

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I just don’t agree with you about that. I don’t think yours is a ridiculous read on it, I just don’t perceive that myself. I think the part you are mentioning is what you’re inferring, not what it’s implying or stating.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Part of the reason is because the first place I saw posts like this was on right wing spaces. They were often trying to say how climate activists like Greta or Bill Nye or even celebrities that try to push climate action are also using private jets or other modes of transportation to get around.

            On the surface it sounds good. But I guarantee you this is a primer.

            It’s a way to target climate activists and force them to target by bicycle. It’s goal is to make any climate action hypocritical.

            • buttnugget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I guess we’ll have to make our own memes that are similar but convey the proper message about capitalism and institutional responsibility.

              • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Honestly fuck yea. We are sleeping on how important memes and shit posts are too keeping pressure on and spreading ideas.

                Just an example, Mehdi was on Jubilee the other day. The amount of clips is incredible. If I clip one, where do I share it here on Lemmy that would be worth the effort?

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s more like a response to the way one of these things is given a disproportionate amount of time and attention. We’re all expected to micromanage every aspect of our lives to diminish our comparatively miniscule impact of personal choice while the state and the ruling class just do whatever the fuck they want actively slaughtering the environment for fun.

      You know what would help me minimize my carbon footprint a lot? Public transportation. A renewable energy grid. Affordable food created along sustainable and environmentally conscious supply chains. Electronics and clothing that is manufactured with long term use, maintenance, and recyclability in mind.

      Those things are all out of my reach to implement. Me properly sorting my recyclables (which i do) is such a minor impact compared with those other things. Any offsetting done by proper recycling is immediately undone the moment i step into a grocery store, having driven there in my car for lack of public transportation, and buy food that was wastefully produced and transported to my grocery store via fossil fuel based energy.

      The majority of our time and energy should be going into fighting back against the state and the ruling class who refuse to structure society around environmental impact, not on almost the almost irrelevant impact of individual workers. We can and should promote recycling, but we can hammer home that point when our whole society isn’t top down engineered with total indifference to the environment.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I feel this is cooked up by energy company’s in the same way that “snowballs in july” was but I’m not sure how.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    What’s the point here? Shitting on a good deed because someone else has done something bad? Arguing that small contributions don’t matter because others cancel that out? Great, now everbody feels entitled to shitty behaviour because they’re not the most rotten apple in the barrel. I’m sure many good things will come from that line of thought.

    The rule is “Don’t be a jerk”, not “Don’t be a jerk if you’re the only one”

    • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 months ago

      The post is not an indictment of recycling per se. Rather, it points to the absurdity of promoting individual contributions while ignoring the carbon footprint of corporations and the obscenely wealthy.

    • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even if most every day people would lower their carbon footprint as much as possible, corporations would simply say “Neat, we can pollute more, we’re within target emissions”, and they would

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      So, this ‘personal responsibility’ recycling thing was pushed by corporations to excuse their wasteful bullshit.

      Except the situation really is bad enough we need to be pinching fucking pennies ecologically. So we should be doing stuff like this (and actually recycling things rather than just dumping them, as happens now)

      But none of that matters while billionaires are fucking around; you’re just ordering cheap drinks at the craps table so maybe you can play a few more rounds. Your gains will be harvested to fuel the degenerate tendencies of the wealthy. They would matter in another world, be necessary in another world, but don’t in this one, where they are necessary but wasted.

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Benefits of trying to go zero plastic is: you can eat healthier. No highly processed food, sodas and all this industrial shit. It’s mostly fresh fruits, veggies, cereals, and once in a while, a bit of meat straight from the butcher or local market. And ok, you can’t be sure it wasn’t wrapped in plastic until it arrived in your kitchen, but at least, you have less garbage to throw out.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Being ecologically friendly is its own reward.

    If your neighbor’s house and lawn is cluttered with garbage and rotting food, do you also let your house gather the same?

    Or do you wish they did a better job and kept your house clean all the same?

    What if you had 95 neighbors all full of garbage and rotted food? Is there any number that would make you do the same?

    • adidev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not quite a compare - you can move house, you can’t move planet. It’s not that I would stop looking after my own garden if my neighbours weren’t looking after theirs. It just feels pointless. Using your analogy, if all surrounding neighbours had rotten rubbish in their garden, no matter what you would do, it would still stink in your garden.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I hear this argument over and over again: “Why should I bother recycling? China is poisoning the planet.” It’s like reverse-whataboutism. I find it really lazy and a pointless attitude. The argument generalizes to: “Why do anything good when bad exists in the world?”

        Cleanliness is its own reward. I can tell you if I lived in stink-town where 100% of everyone else’s house was a festering mess, I would keep mine clean.

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    so what’s the verdict on hot sauce and yogurt

    edit i think i meant that for elsewhere but fuck this, that’s a good headline in the image, and fuck this again

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is exactly why I don’t beat myself up over any of this shit… I will do what I can within my own power, but I don’t go out of my way to stop using plastic forks or anything like that. It’s pointless.

    • tempest@lemmy.caBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Honestly I don’t give one shit about the paper straws. I wonder if the people who don’t like them let their drinks sit for hours and chew on the straw till they’re soggy. Every paper straw I’ve had has lasted the length of time it takes me to drink the drink.

      Still banning those things but not fucking everything else in the supermarket that is packaged in plastic is such a massive and stupid waste of everyone’s time and effort. Such an imperceptible inch forward they almost deserve no praise at all.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It was a surprisingly fast change, to the extent that I wonder if they weren’t planning something along those lines as an industry wide PR stunt or lobbied industry takeover already. Or maybe paper straw machines are just really easy to setup.

        It does show that widespread lasting change is possible. Even if it’s just a single step, we won’t get anywhere if we stop taking them.

        • tempest@lemmy.caBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          The reality is more like there are just a few massive suppliers for restaurants. Sysco just offers paper straws and removes plastic ones and every establishment just orders a different SKU the next week.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The manufacture of straws on that scale can’t be simple to ramp up though. Maybe they just speculated correctly on paper utensil production capacity?

            Either way, there are opportunities for fast large scale change out there.

      • howrar@lemmy.caBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wonder if the people who don’t like them let their drinks sit for hours

        Yes

        and chew on the straw till they’re soggy

        No

          • howrar@lemmy.caBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s not that warm flat sodas appeal to me, but rather that carbonated drinks are painful to drink too quickly. If I have a paper straw, it’s also going to be accompanied by a meal, which takes time to eat. Also, if I’m getting a more interesting drink like a smoothie, slush, boba, etc, then I usually get something fairly large to enjoy over a long period of time.

      • Derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is always “Look, we are actually trying to help the climate” types of government. Helping to build sustainable shit? Put money towards developing open, essy to implement, and easy to service standards? Nah, we will pay a billion dollars towards some bullshit that will be forgotten in a year and 80% (if not more) of the cash will be pocketed by billionaires (to use towards lobbying either against shit that will lose em money or shit that will make em money) because the contract was overpriced.

        Fuck humanity, seriously. I just wish we will get a revolution before we burn to a crisp.

  • then_three_more@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Surely it’s fraud. They say they’re going to recycle (presumably charge whoever they charge based on that too) then just dump it.