Recently the server staff received an e-mail telling them to moderate the Discord server and the server chat on what they deem to be “appropriate.”

Below is a message from owner of the server.

Free Speech Under Attack

Dear friends, I don’t often post announcements of this sort, but I feel it’s very important for you all to know what’s currently going on.

From the very start, over 15 years ago, one of the key founding principles of MinecraftOnline has been free speech. What started out as an uncontroversal, common sense policy, has proved to be a cornerstone of this increasingly unique community. As time has passed and Western society has wavered back and forth in its political leanings, free speech has repeatedly come under attack for political reasons. It has now become common to see arrests for posts on social media in countries such as Britain and Germany, in the name of political control, which have overtaken the numbers even of traditionally totalitarian countries such as China and Russia - a truly dystopian nightmare for freedom of expression and personal liberty.

Throughout this decade and a half of change, MinecraftOnline has held steadfast to its libertarian principles, and remained an oasis of freedom and openness in an increasingly closed and controlled internet. That is, until now.

Microsoft, through their subsidiary Mojang, have issued an ultimatum to MinecraftOnline. We have been told to do away with our free speech policy (which long pre-dates Microsoft’s acquisition of Mojang), within 7 days, or face a a permanent block. If that happens, nobody will be able to play on MinecraftOnline again, and the 15-year history of this beloved server will come to a sudden and bitter end. The full email we have received today, signed facelessly only as “Mojang Enforcement”, is included below.

The email makes extremely vague claims about “harmful interactions” and “harmful comments”, and we are asking Microsoft to clarify what specific interactions and comments they consider harmful. In the meantime, please spread the word, share this info on social media. Defend free speech.

-SlowRiot

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ngl, whenever “libertarians” get their hackles up about needing a right to “free speech”, I always suspect they mean bigotry and slurs.

    • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Everyone is entitled to their opinion about bigotry and slurs, but having soulless American mega-corporations enforcing the current lowest common denominator about what is acceptable is not the win some people might think it is. Sure, they might seem like they’re on your side, and thus the right side, now, but this can change quickly and radically.

      • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t agree. I think shutting down places that promote bigotry and slurs is good.

        If they just want to run a minecraft server, they easily can. They just can’t also use that as a place to promote hatred and bigotry.

        What you’re making is a slippery slope argument that doesn’t really hold water.

        • Glaive0@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m of two minds on this. I agree that fewer safe spaces for bigots is fantastic and pushes back against the normalization of some really vile things as “just an opinion”, “just joking”, “voicing all sides”, “making up funny stories about famous people”, “just boys being boys”, or other means of “criticizing” those in power.

          However, we are ACTIVELY sliding down the slippery slope that people have been calling a fallacy for over a decade, and watching the same arguments used to create spaces free from the most hateful people on the internet get twisted and co-opted by those same people to ban and punish genuine criticism of atrocities and voices against abuses of power.

          There are sacrifices with either choice more akin to a check in chess than an opportunity to choose a truly better outcome. Seeing all the good other Minecraft communities have done in making libraries and humanitarian resources available in creative ways gives me hope, but watching a government bedbuddy of a company like Microsoft start with the easy win of banning Nazis and bigots makes me really hope that thats truly their focus and not an opening to take out some of the amazing and creative workarounds people have done to combat censorship and human rights abuses in their own Minecraft way.

        • I’ve seen peaceful protestors in the USA, UK and Germany get charged as rioters and terrorists for opposing the Israeli genocide against Palestinians. Also, the media lost its shit at criticism of Charlie Kirk. cronenthal’s argument absolutely holds water.

  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hate Microsoft but I also hate self-described “Libertarians” complaining about free speech because it usually means they want to spam slurs and white supremacist bullshit without pushback.

    • gnawmon@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      I replied to a comment like this somewhere else, so I’ll just paste this here

      Take this with a grain of salt, as I’m a commoner on the server.

      While freedom of speech means you can yell whatever racial slurs you want, it doesn’t mean you are free from consequences. When you start saying bigoted stuff on the chat, you will be targeted by players and get /ignore’d.

      I would advise you to make your own judgement by reading the chat logs on Discord or IRC, but not everybody has that amount of time. Some people said vile stuff here, but every time someone says some weird stuff, it always gets backlash, and it definitely isn’t a nazi breeding ground.

      Also I’ll add this, Most of the server staff and community are queer and from different backgrounds, slurs aren’t taken kindly here.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    Aside from my concerns about the kind of shit libertarians think counts as free speech, how the hell would Microsoft implement a ban on a Minecraft server that Microsoft doesn’t host?

    Like I assume it’s just connecting to the server by hostname or IP. What are they gonna do, hardcode the server’s known IPs and hostnames and prevent connections??

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      how the hell would Microsoft implement a ban on a Minecraft server that Microsoft doesn’t host?

      if a minecraft server wants to enforce verification of the game license, the server needs to be in contact with the authentication servers of microsoft. the server operator can turn this off, but then moderation becomes much harder, as usernane based banning becomes useless, and the paywall from ban evasion disappears.

      other than that, in recent years there’s something with chat message verification that I think involves sending some of the messages to microsoft? I don’t remember exactly

      but also the minecraft client could have a built in blacklist of servers. I don’t know if it has but it’s not much work.
      a ban from the authentication server is probably easier though.

      • The chat message verification is the Chat Reporting system, which can be required on servers. That’s a whole rabbit hole to go down. TL;DR you can get banned from Minecraft if your messages get reported. (Use the NoChatReports mod like everyone does)

    • fbr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Basically, yeah. The vanilla client checks a blacklist when it connects to a server and prevents the connection if it’s blocked.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    TL;DR: Fascists fucking over (mostly) fascists. How about we sit back, watch, learn and switch to alternatives (Luanti), or at least offline/cracked Minecraft?

  • KeriKitty (They(/It))@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    (Severe sarcasm warning. Look away if you’re allergic.)

    I like that they effectively compared themselves getting an email to people getting arrested for totally innocent social media posts about nothing in particular, which we can all assume is the case without looking into at all. I also like that they’re asking for widespread outrage against this, and want a person’s name to attack converse sincerely with in the Free Marketplace of Ideas™. Such a good, honest person we can definitely trust implicitly, trying to protect Freeze Peach™ from Woke™ Left-Wing™ tyrants like Microsoft.

    Maybe “like” is the wrong word. Hmmm.

    [Not sarcasm] Right, we know what’s going on here. Gross, cruel, hateful people just wanna have endless “rights” over everyone else and I’m so sick of their games I can hardly even type a non-sarcastic sentence. Ugh. Bleh. Et cetera. 🙄

    • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Self-hosted private server, just like a lemmy instance, one joins out of their own will. Imagine mega corporations being able to decide what is acceptable on your lemmy instance and take it down if they don’t like it?

        • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          "if you were in violation of lemmy’s terms of use, yeah…” wait, is there a central lemmy that can nuke other instances? I thought the whole point of the Fediverse was that if you don’t like an instance, you just defederate from it, and that there was no central power.

          Yeah, we used to own the software we bought and could do whatever we wanted with it on our private storage, but now capitalism has realized it’s more lucrative to only sell licenses. Imagine Microsoft/Apple/Google erasing your privately stored documents tomorrow because they contained stuff against their policies. Very dangerous when you have governments banning abortion, trans rights, and even labeling antifascism as terrorism.

          I can’t believe the number of people thinking trillion dollar mega corporations overreach is good just because it’s happening to others. Tomorrow, it’s you - that’s why we need more consumer rights and privacy protection, but the thing about rights is that they are for everyone and not just for the people you pick.

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            is there a central lemmy that can nuke other instances?

            There is a legal process. Violating the AGPL that Lemmy is released under, for example.

            Edited to add “Not letting me use slurs is a slippery slope to blocking positive lgbtqia statements” is an insane take, BTW.

            The answer is simple - dont use their shit or abide by their terms. No, the intolerant do not gain any advantage with me by trying to cover with “freedom of speech” or “but what if they do it to trans folks?!?”

            These are the people denigrating others, and while using a licensed piece of software too. Guess what - its under their licensing, thats their mistake. They can also stop being cool with having a Nazi bar.

            • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t think AGPLv3 license would prevent someone from opening a nazi bar lemmy though…

              • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                It would not.

                I don’t believe it said it would not either.

                I said if it was in violation of the established terms.

    • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      What Microsoft is doing with Minecraft should be illegal. After they purchased Minecraft from Mojang, they started changing the rules so instead of being a game you have purchased and you play with your friends how you want to play it, it’s a game that you have a temporary license to use in a way that Microsoft thinks is appropriate for small children, even if you are hosting your own private server like these people are doing. Microsoft doesn’t like the way that these people are playing the game and talking outside the game, so they are taking the game away. You may not like these people because they sound like the kind of people that use “free speech” as an excuse for hate speech, but would it be the same if Microsoft were taking away the game from servers that allowed people to specify their pronouns or use different color combinations associated with LGBTQ representation, which they may soon be pressured to do by the government of the country they are headquartered in?

  • Ah, of course it’s about the serious violations on free speech in *checks notes* the brutal dictatorships of Britain and Germany. The dictatorship of common sense dictating you how not to be an asshole.

    That’s so terrible!

    • 9bananas@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      eh, the exaggeration aside…the trend lately IS extremely worrying.

      especially the treatment of protesters.

      that said I’m pretty sure that’s got little to do with this situation…tend to agree with the others ITT: “libertarian” and “free speech” is seldom a good combination of words…

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Britain marked Palestinian Action as a terrorist group and Germany has also cracked down on pro-Palestinian content.

      These are not the bastions of freedom that you seem to think they are.

        • but do we? Microsoft is absolutely a mega-corp and would not hesitate to screw over people for money. If you’re anti-bigoty, don’t assume they’re your friend. Maybe someone “insulted” Charlie Kirk, or said that ICE are Nazis. Remember Jimmy Kimmel? I get your sarcasm in your original post, but I think you’re making an assumption that corporations are in the right when they take down speech, when they’d just as quickly shut down a trans-supportive group as they would a transphobic group.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This has right-wing snowflakes getting upset over Charlie Kirk comments all over it.

    There are currently 3 things you cannot bring up or speak negatively about or it will end up being penalized and censored

    You cannot :

    • criticizeTrump
    • bring up Epstein
    • speak about up Charlie Kirk’s factual history

    Everything else is free speech.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    If it’s one of the oldest ones, I assume it’s for Java, which means it’s entirely run by the server operator and not one of those shitty 3rd party hosted servers you can rent out from within Bedrock.

    I don’t remember ever seeing anything about how you need to run a server of your own in compliance with Mojang’s rules in the EULA or TOS.

  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Tomorrow, to conform to the new regime, Microsoft starts to shut down private servers with mentions to LGBT and Antifa.
    If you don’t stand up for free speech when its idiots using slurs, there will be no one left to stand up for you tomorrow when its your speech under attack.

  • KT-TOT@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Minecraft is actually a spiritual successor to a mid 1940s board game entitled MeineCraft.

    The original Minecraft creator, Notch, has long looked up to the author of the original and particularly idolizes the 34th Revision of the popular game.

    For more information google Notch Hitler R34

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Luanti (Minetest) folks.

    The modding momentum is picking up quite a bit and as a game engine its far better than Minecraft.