ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 天前Ahead of her timelemmy.curiana.netimagemessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down10
arrow-up1418arrow-down1imageAhead of her timelemmy.curiana.netExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 21 天前message-square59linkfedilink
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up97·21 天前There were plenty of articles claiming similar for her dogshit. Where’s the peer reviewed studies?
minus-squarecRazi_man@europe.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up64·edit-221 天前You think news headlines are concerned with inconvenient shit like evidence?
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·21 天前Of course not. Just pointing out that it’s probably bullshit just like previous similar claims. The exact thing its making fun of.
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 天前I mean, they really should be. Imagine how much better everything were if news outlets could be hold responsible for spreading lies.
minus-squareExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·21 天前They don’t name the exact study but this research is related: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-52310-9 https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/nov/20/pinprick-blood-test-could-detect-disease-10-years-before-symptoms-appear-study
There were plenty of articles claiming similar for her dogshit. Where’s the peer reviewed studies?
You think news headlines are concerned with inconvenient shit like evidence?
Of course not. Just pointing out that it’s probably bullshit just like previous similar claims. The exact thing its making fun of.
I mean, they really should be. Imagine how much better everything were if news outlets could be hold responsible for spreading lies.
They don’t name the exact study but this research is related: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-52310-9
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/nov/20/pinprick-blood-test-could-detect-disease-10-years-before-symptoms-appear-study