Vanayo@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · edit-222 days agoThe United Nations held a vote on the death penalty. This is how countries votedworldcoalition.orgimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1194arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1194arrow-down1imageThe United Nations held a vote on the death penalty. This is how countries votedworldcoalition.orgVanayo@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · edit-222 days agomessage-square29linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMummifiedClient5000@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up231·22 days agoThe headline makes it sound like the “in favour” votes were for death penalty, which is not correct. This was a vote for a moratorium - a temporary suspension - of death penalty.
minus-squareSaltycracker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up34·22 days agoThis now makes more sense. The headline did a shitty job
minus-squaretrashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up24·22 days agoOmg thank you for the explanation I was real worried there for a second
minus-squareINHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-221 days agoI was wondering how we are somehow in favour when we don’t even have it. (op is a cunt Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi)
minus-squarenkk@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·19 days agoIf it makes the United States look good it has to be wrong
minus-squarey0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·22 days agoThank you I was very confused seeing many of these countries “against”
minus-squarecrypt0cler1c@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 days agoThe only people who were confused are the ones who didn’t actually read the diagram.
minus-squareMummifiedClient5000@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·21 days agoThat’s no excuse for a misleading headline.
minus-squarecrypt0cler1c@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·21 days agoIt’s not misleading at all…
minus-squareargarath@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·21 days agoYeah I came here to ask about this, because Brazil voting in favor of the death penalty when it doesn’t have it did set off some alarms for me
minus-squareBubbaonthebeach@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 days agoThought the same looking up Canada.
The headline makes it sound like the “in favour” votes were for death penalty, which is not correct. This was a vote for a moratorium - a temporary suspension - of death penalty.
This now makes more sense. The headline did a shitty job
Omg thank you for the explanation I was real worried there for a second
I was wondering how we are somehow in favour when we don’t even have it.
(op is a cunt Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi)
If it makes the United States look good it has to be wrong
Thank you I was very confused seeing many of these countries “against”
The only people who were confused are the ones who didn’t actually read the diagram.
That’s no excuse for a misleading headline.
It’s not misleading at all…
Yeah I came here to ask about this, because Brazil voting in favor of the death penalty when it doesn’t have it did set off some alarms for me
Thought the same looking up Canada.
New Zealand and Iceland lol