• Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    18 days ago

    I will take one for the team and take $140k a year and report back. It’ll be hard, since it’s only 3 times what I make now, but it’s worth it for science.

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 days ago

    Makes sense. About a decade ago it was estimated around 80k. With the post-covid world the way it is I think that increase is reasonable

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      87.5k in SJ, california. 100k is low income there now. now theres like a reverse white flight going in bay area now. the soccer mom karens have returned. signs of gentrification is the increasing amount of CAFES in the area.

    • ramielrowe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      18 days ago

      If you were to actually read the substack the original author wrote, it’s well justified reasoning. The original poverty calculation was based on the cost of food as a percentage of income of a family that is fully participating in society. The author explains though that food is a much smaller portion of our daily expenses and that the cost of fully participating in society includes significantly more expenses. So, if we still use food as a baseline, but re-evaluate it’s percentage of expenses. The new poverty line comes out to about 130k. The author also validates this by looking at the national average expenses and indeed for a family, fully participating in society with no government support, it’s around that range. But you know, continue being snarky.

    • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 days ago

      The author may be right or wrong, but at least they make a real argument. You… not so much.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 days ago

      Why not shut up long enough to read and create an informed view of the other parties argument

      I know it takes a few seconds longer then being an illiterate dummy. But you can do it champ.