OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-213 天前Epic boss Tim Sweeney thinks stores like Steam should stop labelling games as being made with AI: 'It makes no sense,' he says, because 'AI will be involved in nearly all future productionshare.googleexternal-linkmessage-square145linkfedilinkarrow-up1511arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1511arrow-down1external-linkEpic boss Tim Sweeney thinks stores like Steam should stop labelling games as being made with AI: 'It makes no sense,' he says, because 'AI will be involved in nearly all future productionshare.googleOldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-213 天前message-square145linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMika@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·13 天前So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-213 天前The people lazy enough to have ai generate their code aren’t going to do that. You’re acting like games didn’t already have bugs before we invented a mostly wrong shortcut that kinda looks just good enough to fake being useful.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-212 天前 So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human. If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem in keeping code quality while using AI”.
minus-squaredukemirage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 天前A decent review process is always necessary, LLMs or not.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 天前OK, sure, but again the claim was: there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
minus-squareMika@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 天前This is necessary when working with 100% human code too.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 天前OK, sure, but again the claim was: there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
The people lazy enough to have ai generate their code aren’t going to do that. You’re acting like games didn’t already have bugs before we invented a mostly wrong shortcut that kinda looks just good enough to fake being useful.
If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem in keeping code quality while using AI”.
A decent review process is always necessary, LLMs or not.
deleted by creator
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
This is necessary when working with 100% human code too.
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.