What I don’t get is why it took them decades to figure this out. Why have they been giving us sugar substitutes without understanding what they have been doing to us? Why were these approved for use in the first place?

  • gustofwind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m not sure why people expected all these sugar substitutes to be harmless

    The entire notion of sugar substitution in the first place should be such an insane concept to everyone but somehow we’ve instead created a diet soda and junk food entitlement

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        Ingesting chemicals to mimic sugar so you can have sweet things with no caloric consequences doesn’t seem insane to you?

          • gustofwind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            6 days ago

            Seems pretty ridiculous on face. Everyone is comfortable acknowledging how evil food and chemical companies are, and that is not new info

            This is the equivalent of believing tobacco companies about cigarettes and then being super surprised down the line that they either lied or didn’t do enough research

              • gustofwind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                6 days ago

                Ingesting chemicals created by known bad actors in the food and chemical industry for the purpose of having those same bad actors sell you unlimited addictive sweets…

                I mean come on

                • Lumidaub@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  If your entire argument is “food industry bad”, that’s not very convincing. Do you somehow produce everything you eat yourself? Do you make your own clothes too, from resources you collected yourself? Did you collect the resources to make the device you post on yourself and put them together?

                  • gustofwind@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    I do my best to purchase the most sustainable and quality versions of any given offering I can. I’ll also readily acknowledge the harms and where we do and don’t have choices

                    But I’m not sure how you jumped from the notion that the industries behind artificial sweeteners, who we already know are verifiably bad and overtly acting against the interests of public health to… you didn’t make your own clothes so artificial sweeteners are actually safe and awesome 🤪

                • Elextra@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  For me, I think there could be room for scientific advancement. I mean look at all we have today that we wouldn’t think possible decades ago. And people are still finding new foods. Food scientists are a thing. While there are bad actors out there sometimes if its really cool and really good, you can have a new product good for the public and profitable.

                  Like the other poster said, I’m no scientist by any means. Its not out of the question for our society to have artificial sweeteners that aren’t bad for us. There’s many out there. Maybe some are bad, maybe some okay for our health.

        • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          i drink chemical called water. i add a bunch of chemicals clumped up in bean form, then roast those beans, and grind them up sometimes and call it coffee. I sprinkle in a chemical, sucrose, we call sugar. It’s all chemicals. I love chemicals. You love chemicals. We are all chemicals. You know why? Because you are made of dna. Guess what DNA is made of? That’s right, chemicals baby. DNA needs more chemicals to make more copies of itself. Without more chemicals, it would have to break the laws of thermodynamics to replicate itself. More chemicals are needed.

          every time you think “they’re feeding us chemicals” as opposed to what? use synthetic or naturally occurring as a distinction or something. I am partial to lab juice.

        • Slotos@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Injecting chemicals just so you can have sweet things power your muscle performance without buildup of acetone doesn’t seem insane to you?

          Sugar is a chemical, you dumb fuck.

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        It is if you don’t eat too much

        But aspartame will literally damage the DNA in your colon because it’s inherently genotoxic to our cells

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          6 days ago

          The DNA damage comes from the formaldehyde that the body produces when metabolizing aspartame, but guess what? The body makes formaldehyde anyway, just from its natural metabolic processes. As long as you don’t consume too much it’s fine.

          The problem is over-consumption, which is the basis of having a consumer economy. If everyone ate less the food industry would collapse. They need us to overeat and if we ever stopped they’d have to reconcile with the fact that they can’t just keep growing their profits infinitely. Plus, when we overeat, they can make even more money by treating the sicknesses it causes. Win/Win!

        • xep@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Don’t consume either. Artificial sweeteners are UPFs and sugar in all its forms have no place in the human diet.

          • TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            6 days ago

            If you remove sugar in all its forms from your diet then you’d better forget about eating any plants whatsoever. Cellulose is sugar, carbs are sugar. Where do you think we get our energy from?

              • TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 days ago

                Lipids (fat) also gets converted into glucose before your body can use it. If we’re cutting out sugar in all forms then that counts too.

                • xep@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  That is also my understanding. We needn’t consume any exogenous sugars in any form, since the body is able to make all it needs.

                  If we’re cutting out sugar in all forms then that counts too.

                  That’s nothing near to what I said. To reiterate my statement, there is no requirement for sugar in the human diet.

          • gustofwind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            Indeed, we should all be trying to reduce even sugar to 0

            If there is a food Overton window it’s a solar system away from a normal diet