- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella penned an AI-heavy blog post to close out 2025, leading to widespread mockery and a brand new moniker for the big M.
You must log in or # to comment.
CEO proves that CEOs can be replaced by AI.
“Micro$haft” and “Micro$hit”, two former snarl names aimed at Microsoft, got a real challenger.
(The dollar signs are intentional.)
Why not both moment:
Micro$lop
fuckin’ brilliant.
Bravo 👏
Imagine being in charge of one of the wealthiest corporations to have ever existed, and yet unwilling to write out a statement without a fucking llm
It must be hard to admit he spent billions on a slop machine. Sunk cost fallacy is probably one of many things they’re fighting.
It will become the norm. Our CEO uses ChatGPT a lot. He used it to write a Christmas email to the whole company. All of his correspondence it devoid of any personality.
Your company can save a lot of money by replacing him with an used laptop that only opens chatGPT on startup.
https://replaceyourboss.ai/ Be the change!
You are assuming that they have a personality to begin with.
deleted by creator
If Microsoft is now Microslop, then the CEO should be called sloperator
the vice is the sloppy second
deleted by creator
Chief Executive SloppySir
I love this for them. They refuse to change course so it is on them.
They worked hard for it, and earned it.
it would be pretty interesting if Microsoft made the next version of Windows a Linux distro with a Windows emulation layer
With Edge running on top to render all user interface elements.
Edge running Chromium inside, loading windows web app from Microsoft website every startup
I just threw up a bit at the thought.
I think it’d be a full screen ai client app running on linux, probably on cage. why bother with the nt and win32 and whatever middlewares. linux is externally maintained. saved dev money can be used for power/ram bills instead.
Or throw their support behind certain distros with said emulation layers, maybe even a desktop environment like Plasma with a “Microsoft theme”.
Honestly I think it is a great idea either way.
Regardless of their commercial goals, if they put their weight into supporting the Linux ecosystem we’d undoubtedly benefit as a whole. For instance from common upstream bug fixes and increased user adoption of Linux by their remaining loyalist customers.
Yes, until they do like Google with android
Well, if they let AI write all the software I bet it will be. I’m sure it’s been trained on the Linux source code.
That would never happen. The entire reason why Windows is not as power efficient as MacOS or some Linux distros is the backwards compatibility that it brings. People laugh at the fact that you can still find icons and .dlls from Windows 95 (or, probably, even 3), but that’s exactly one of the reasons why this OS is so massively popular, especially for enterprise users.
I’m sorry but this is just not true. The legacy support within Linux is insane and it’s one of the hallmarks of the operating system.
What are you talking about? Linux has virtually no backwards compatibility at all. Maybe one or two years max. The kernel is fine. The weak point is glibc.
You literally need to recompile applications constantly to stay compatible with glibc. Otherwise they just don’t work.
The good news is that distros are constantly providing freshly compiled versions of open source applications.
The bad news is that actual binary backwards compatibility is non existent. Try running a binary compiled in 2005 on modern Linux. You’ll just get a ton of glibc errors.
Windows lets you run applications compiled in 1995 on modern desktops.
Linux is great and it’s what I use. But we can’t claim backwards compatibility as a strength. Maybe a binary compiled today with musl might run in 2036 but musl targeting is quite rare.
Linux has excellent legacy support for Linux.
Now run a 1998 obscure Windows vendor custom app. The vendor went out of business 30 years ago.
Not to mention that it would kill the entirety of existing IT automation, the entirety of centralised system management, and lots more.
Actually, Linux has better support for legacy Windows apps (through wine) than for legacy Linux apps.
Your best bet to run it probably is on Linux with Wine. Or if it is MS themselves , they already have their own Win32 to Linux translation layers, for example DB2 for Linux runs that way.
Or you can just not introduce extra instability layers and use native Windows. I can’t even fathom the cost of implementation and maintenance of something like that in a company like HCL (200 000 employees, last I checked).
Haha, are you aware of how many layers of Windows are just backward compatibility hacks? Architecturally Windows has changed a lot since Win98.
The fact that your 30year old business software is still running is just the fact that Windows has built in patches for some common programming patterns used at the time and someone having insight enough can enable/disable them (mostly).
Btw, the same for games. Windows detects specific games and re-enables former direct x bugs.
There are numerous layers of abstraction between your Win32 application and the Kernel, there’s no reason they won’t work on another kernel.
Oh. And of course it’s badly debuggable and frequently goes wrong.
I stopped maintaining Windows systems and focused on developing software - it’s so effing annoying that things always break out of the blue with a new windows patch versions because MS has bad quality control on their overcomplicated house of cards that is named Windows.
The fact that your 30year old business software is still running is just the fact that Windows has built in patches for some common programming patterns used at the time and someone having insight enough can enable/disable them (mostly).
… which is exactly my point. What’s yours?
Oh. And of course it’s badly debuggable and frequently goes wrong.
Not so frequently to cause major disruptions.
I vote to forecfully rebrand them as Macrosoft.
Macroslop would be better
Macroslurp
Apropos of nothing, there’s a studio that makes porn games called neversoft, and I think it’s a brilliant name.
and tony hawk games
Far as I can tell, these are different companies
. >< well the good neversoft then - the spike through an eyeball
I’m only familiar with the one that made Spider-Man for PS1.
I’m sure the shareholders will be suuuuper happy to learn that Micropilot Copilot 365 Copilot Azure Copilot Copilot Teams Copilot is now on 111% of every WinCopilot install, which will totally mean great profits.
But just in case, let’s lay off 5-10% of our workforce again this quarter just to further drive home how profitable we are!
Found Copilot randomly installed on my computer after the latest update. Couldn’t uninstall it fast enough
inb4 they name System32 to Copilot so you can’t delete it.
Watch me!
User has disconnected
same here. I uninstalled so much bloatware that automatically installed in the past six months without my permission
they’re driving us away
Microslurp! We make software slurplier!
Agh, could you make it a little shittier?
Sure!
Microshit! We make shit softer! We put our shit on your computer, your phone, your favorite netflix server. Everywhere! We make our shit softer and put it everywhere!
That’s it!!!
Do you know why it’s called MicroSoft? The founders and CEOs decided to name the company after their penises.
🙄
