• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    6 months ago

    I thought the POTUS couldn’t break the law? Or does that go out the window once they’re not sitting? Does Trump really want to set THAT precedent?

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yup. And at that time, we never found out if it was true or not. Since then, Republicans have been tirelessly working to ensure it is. And now we see the fruits of their labor: a Republican president as king.

          • santa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            Often I imagine had Carter elected to move on a Nixon conviction if we would be where we are now. I don’t think we would. Holding power to account doesn’t seem to be an American or Democratic thing to do. When it is, I believe we may have more geopolitical standing in accountability and Democracy. Until we walk the talk we seem to be a cesspool of quacking ducks.

            • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Jimmy Carter pardoned Nixon because Carter was the bigger person and he believed that forgiveness is the most powerful act one can perform against their attacker.

              What Carter forgot was, he’s supposed to represent the people who voted for him, and the voters weren’t, and didn’t care to be, the bigger person; they wanted accountability and didn’t place such abstract values on the act of forgiveness.

              It was a good personal decision to make, but as a presidential decision, I find it lacking.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 months ago

    …says the guy who doesn’t even know what half the people he’s pardoned were even in prison for.

  • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    A precedent was set in 2005 that stated the president “need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill” and may direct a subordinate to use an autopen, as long as the president has approved and decided to sign it

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Horrible people can say the write thing. While this is not a law, making it illegal would be a good idea.

      Unfortunately that will never happen.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    He is only concerned over illegal actions by Democrats, the poors, and brown people. Everyone else gets congratulations.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Heck for a good contribution you get a pardon too. Can even not be white for the right amount. Only people he says one nice thing about are people who’ve fluffed him up. If you’ve said no once to him you’re on his shit list.

      Awesome leader there United States, hah he’s a LINO anyways, leader in name only. It’s really president Miller, the guy who got into politics cause he’s too weak to strangle prostitutes.