It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    ·
    7 months ago
    1. it’s fucking Chromium

    Go use some Firefox-derivative like Librewolf or Fennec, like a sane person.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Librewolf’s defaults are so bad, and changing them basically entirely removes the anti fingerprinting features

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Never used librewolf.
        But it sounds like the conveniences you want are a compromise for fingerprinting.

        Don’t let perfect stand in the way of good.
        The internet has been significantly ruined by large companies.
        There is a loop where companies with the resources to create and maintain frameworks/tooling/whatever are large enough to help define “features” for browsers.
        Browsers don’t make money, not really. To even be considered, they have to be able to run what the big companies are pushing.
        All of this makes it very easy for smaller companies to deliver better websites. Or abuse the features big companies are pushing.

        It’s like: email was awesome, then spam emails happened. Websites were accessible, then SPAs happened. Search engines were useful, the scraping/AI happened.

        I don’t know what I am trying to say.
        Other than browsers do not get the support they deserve to actually be decent unless they are backed by a company that wants to loss-lead them… Which has resulted in the web being pretty fucked

        • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Don’t let perfect stand in the way of good.

          Same can be said about fingerprinting protection.

          Search engines were useful, the scraping/AI happened.

          Google’s quality has decreased, but other engines have improved, and LLM search summaries are really good (brave search is a good example of this)

          I think LibreWolf enforces compromises I’m not willing to do, instead of using different techniques

      • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I agree, I know why they do it and I can appreciate it, but it’s just not for me. I do not want my history and cookies cleared when I closed the browser, for instance. That is massively inconvenient and not really relevant to my “threat model.”

        So I guess I wouldn’t say they are bad, but certainly not ideal for me.

        • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Forced English language, light mode, fixed window size or borders, cookies removed after closing, no history(? Not sure about this one)

          Want those or just one of them? You have to remove ALL fingerprinting protections for some reasons. Might as well use Firefox then…

    • xiii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      LibreWolf doesn’t update itself on OSes other than Linux, it’s a security nightmare for an average person.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 months ago

      Basically the thing that turned the internet against Honey, but when a homophobic piece of shit does it it’s fine

      • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honey swapped the referal code when another reflink was clicked, brave only applied it’s own code when no referral was used. Not saying that it’s good but honey was purposefully robbing creators, often their own partners when brave only tried to make some money on the side.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just mentioned how I didn’t like people recommending this like last week and got “ok” as a response lol. Some people are just ignorant and don’t care.

  • hemmetti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    6 months ago

    Brave is just a shitty browser. Did not know they were anti-freedom kind of people. Makes browser no-no.

    • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      I did not know Brendan Eich was ousted from Mozilla and launched Brave because he was a homophobe who funded anti-LGBT+ campaigns 😬

  • Cekan14@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    I use Firefox. I know it’s not perfect, but it’s not that bad.

    And if I didn’t, I’d use Vivaldi. Only reason I don’t is I do prefer open source whenever possible and, well, Firefox isn’t Chromium.

    • FG_3479@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      LibreWilf is a good choice if you don’t want the Mozilla crap. Just make sure to turn off the cookie clearing and resistFingerprinting then enable WebGL in the browser’s settings.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah it kinda mystifies me that anyone is still recommending that shitty bigotware.

    In the emulation scene, RetroArch is in a similar boat if I’m understanding things correctly. Awful maintainers, but people keep recommending it and supporting it. Sucks too, because there are even fewer alternatives there.

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        This website details various issues. I’d suggest looking at the Byuu page - as I understand it the RetroArch devs played a large role in the harrassments that were being done to the developer of Higan/bsnes, which eventually led to them killing themself.

  • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I have been using Brave for its out of the box ad and tracker blocking. I’d been uncomfortable with the new AI features and had always been skeptical of the crypto integration, but it wasn’t until this post that I realized it was appreciably worse than Firefox on those counts, nor how bad the people running it are.

    Obviously, I’m now looking for other options. I’ve seen some good recs for desktop browsers elsewhere on this post, but what I’m not seeing is a lot of good mobile browser suggestions that will have the desired features. What would the folks here suggest for an e/OS browsing experience with similar or better privacy and ad blocking options? I know there’s Firefox, but A. With all the AI it keeps pushing, I’m sure there has to be better and B. I do also have mobile Firefox but have found it substantially less usable for my habit of browsing with a zillion tabs both non-incognito and incognito, so I mostly had only been it when I couldn’t get a video to play in Brave.

    I am, obviously, willing to run de-Googled Chromium, but if something else is going to actually support 100+ tabs in a performant fashion I’d be happy to totally de-Chromium too.

    I also use the shit out of profiles on Brave desktop, though mobile doesn’t support it. Do the Firefox forks like Waterfox have a similar option on desktop? Does another browser? I know it’s a feature Chrome has because I do sadly have to use Chrome for work, so I would expect at least the de-Googled Chromium-based ones would?

      • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        LibreWolf looks promising. No mobile app, but they recommend IronFox for that, so I just downloaded that to play with. Thanks!

        Edit: mobile IronFox is looking pretty good so far. Made configuring privacy settings an option just out of the box, which I appreciate. Biggest problem right now is that I can’t seem to figure out how to import my bookmarks from Brave.

    • stochasticlemon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve been using Vivaldi (chromium-based) for about three years now. It’s customizable and has been generally solid. Also has a couple of unique tab management features. Doesn’t have builtin ad blocking afaik. But for that I use adguard desktop and route all my traffic through it, which filters out ads regardless of which browser I’m in. On iOS I can recommend Orion by kagi. It’s the only other webkit browser besides Safari, runs light, and has decent builtin ad blocking

    • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Currently trying mobile IronFox. I’m liking the privacy options and how stuff like unlock origin is literally included in the setup process. Their dark mode is nice and they offer a lot of compatibility options.

      Biggest downsides I’m seeing so far (I’ll see about keeping this updated as I go):

      1. Can’t seem to figure out how to import my bookmarks from Brave, and I have looked extensively.
      2. No tab groups (not the end of the world, but it was a nice feature). EDIT: Looks like Collections does that! EDIT TWO: Not really good for Incognito mode though.
      3. Clears your browser history by default on close, which may be undesired behavior. (I personally tend to use incognito for most things and then transfer sites over to tabs in non-incognito (cognito?) modes if I want them available regularly, so for me this was undesired, but it was easy to turn off.)
      4. Brave had a built-in experimental dark mode to dark modify websites that I am not seeing in IronFox. I’m sure there are extensions that will do it for me, so I’ll go looking, but I just discovered so many sites I did not realize were light mode all along. Reading mode also does the trick for most articles.
    • rodneylives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I use Vivaldi as a secondary browser, it’s not been too bad. Firefox is my primary, but I might go to a fork soon.

    • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have the habit of running Firefox on Android with thousands of tabs (before unloading them into a list on the desktop and cleaning them up). It does slow down somewhat, but not much.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    FWIW I remember a former colleague who recommended it to me and his argument was about the cryptocurrency you “earn” from it.

    I asked him if he could withdraw it. I asked him if he tried. He said not yet but he would. He came back to me few days later saying something along the line that “it’s not straightforward” which was a polite way to say he didn’t manage yet. He worked in IT.

    To be clear I’m not saying it’s a scam or that one can’t use the crypto “earned” from it but at least back then, few years ago, some people were just riding on the hope, or even faith, that it would amount to something yet it seemed made in such a way to just hold.

    So… not a scam but not exactly empowering users IMHO.

  • EgoNo4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Could someone please recommend an alternative? 😓 I used DuckDuckGo for a while but I NEED something that supports extensions…

    • 404@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      Firefox forks like Librewolf (or Ironfox for mobile) are good.

      Also Vivaldi if you don’t mind proprietary.

    • amio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Vivaldi is Chromium based but with a team that works towards reducing the privacy and usability impact of running something Chromium based. Retains support for adblockers etc, after Google severely limiting that functionality in Chrome itself. Supports Chrome extensions like usual - better than Chrome itself, now.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        There is an inherent cost to internet freedom from using chromium browsers. It gives Google, which controls the back-end, leverage to redefine how the internet works. It’s not as though they haven’t already done it on multiple occasions.

        People will say things like “some websites run better on Chrome” as though that’s a selling point and not a red flag.

        I’m not saying no one should use it or develop on it, but you have to be okay with the real cost.

    • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Please try Zen browser. I can’t go back to any other browser since I switched

        • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It has a strong focus on workflow improvements. I love the way it handles pinned tabs where third party links open as a modal and you can reset the tab with a middle click. It also has very good workspace management and useful keybinds.

      • MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        How does Zen handle blocking adds? I peeked at them but didn’t see anything like uBlock in the mod list. No proton mods there either, which is a tough sell for me.

        Usability looks awesome though. I’m tempted for that alone.

        Edit: I just realized it’s a fork like WaterFox so it will just work. I did also learn there are some weird check ins with Google on that browser though, so maybe not the more security focused browser I’m looking for.

        • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s fair, it was based on a similar browser called Arc that had ambitions to reinvent browsing. That one was chromium based though and maintenance stopped when they wanted to create another AI powered browser. Then the Zen people recreated Arc as an open source browser based on Firefox. I was already used to Arc so Zen was familiar.

          I think there are a lot of benefits to the way the UI is laid out, give it a try you without changing any defaults for a week or so, you might get hooked.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Zen’s not great on a multi-monitor setup, but I like it otherwise. Video playback has been improved a ton since I last tried it.

        • cybirdman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          What is your issue with multi monitor setups? On my Mac and Linux machines I have no issues

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Currently using Fennec on mine and I gotta say, it’s what firefox could’ve been if they actually cared. Smooth, quick, loaded with extensions, and easy.

    • mr_noxx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The Mullvad browser is a good choice. It’s built on the TOR browser, which is built on firefox. As for extensions, they are a privacy liability and most privacy-conscious browsers warn you not to use them.

  • imjustmsk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t think an average person would listen to me if I instructed them to get rid of chrome and get Firefox and install couple extensions for privacy.

    So, I just ask them to download brave and tell them it’s just chrome but better,  It blocks all the annoying stuff on the internet and atleast they will stop using the hell of a pacifier that chrome is and move on.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah exactly, Brave is for people who are scared of installing extensions but clicking a big install button on a site that runs an executable is perfectly fine

      • ForgottenUsername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well I’d argue that with the changes to Manifest, Brave is actually one of your stronger options if chrome is a must have.

        If you don’t need chrome, Firefox (or a fork) with ublock is enough for most.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        This makes me think that the people who install brave, are the people who, 15-20 years ago, would have a IE install that was half toolbars.

        God…remember all the scammy toolbars for IE? and how they could take up half the damn screen on some peoples machines?

      • imjustmsk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Just Ublock origin is more than enough, it’s pretty customisable too, Brave is for people who just wanna install and do nothing

        Except when I install Brave I have to debloat it, holy bloat so is Firefox bloated - I usually get forks (Librewolf, Zen etc)

      • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ublock Origin is the only mandatory extension i can think of.

        Some other extensions I personally use are:

        Gesturefy is useful if you want to control things with mouse gestures (holding right-click and then drawing a shape to activate commands)

        NoScript for a little added security, with the cost of having to manually enable javascript on websites that literally can’t function without it.

        Any extension that runs userscripts.

        Dark Reader for websites that don’t offer a dark mode.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also indians. A lot don’t actually care about the anti-lgbtqia side. They just hate big US tech.

  • LaoiseFu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I had no idea about any of this. Have been using brave on android for a few weeks and very happy with it. What would you recommend instead?

        • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          A bunch of forks just add extra functions, patches or defaults on top of firefox. It’s not a hard fork as in they maintain everything themselves, they’re still based on the latest official firefox releases.

          Removing AI is one of those patches yes.

          • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yea I’m going to go ahead and recommend against opinionated firefox. Oh yea I want some dweeb with misplaced anger and too much time on their hands to dictate how I use the internet. Bitch asses.

            • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              You (the end user) decide how you want to use the internet. The forks you’re probably angry about are the ‘hardened forks’, but whether or not you care about their goals and want to use those is a choice only you can make. Most of what they do is basically change some default configs and remove some ‘bad’(according to the maintainers and the users) features.

              There’s also forks like zen that under the hood use firefox, but customize the user experience significantly.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just keep using it, if it works for you. Every company that makes browsers is a bit shit around the edges, there’s no perfect, pure, wholesome browser. Just use what you want. If you like edge for android, use that. If you want to use vim, use that too.

    • bold_omi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Firefox Focus, Ironfox, or others recommended here. I will note that Waterfox was always quite slow on an android device of mine.