Google confirms its latest update can scan all your photos to “use actual images of you and your loved ones” in AI image generation. That means Gemini seeing who you know and what you do. You likely have tens or hundreds of thousands of photos. They’re all exposed if you update.

    • iLStrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wish I could do that… I even learned like 70% of the knowledge I would need to do something like that… Now I just need the hardware market to crash, so I can actually fucking afford the hardware to do it.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does it matter if you don’t update? I imagine they already have it on their servers, which is where I imagine the photos are mostly processed.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        it backups the whole phone more or less if one chooses to, if there is alternative to it, i dont have a PIXEL, im using a oneplus. to backup the whole phone and redownload everything?

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does it matter what we do? There’s definitely some family member, friend, colleague who has taken a picture of you and your likeness will be processed.

    It’s like people tagging you in Facebook pictures even if you don’t have an account, but worse, because that was an active step. This is fully automated.

    • angband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Soon google will geomap your home interior, and have a full inventory of all your possessions. Should you resist in any way?

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Say, if phones started creating a 3d map everywhere they went, and you obviously disable it. There will, at some point, be someone who enters your house and unwittingly map it out.

        This isn’t about personal resistance but the futility of it as the general populace neither cares, knows or put any thought into it.

        I use opt out strings in my SSID, blurred the house on gmaps, etc. Last year noticed some random person put it on mapillary, there’s other services that require other optout strings. That’s just scratching the surface.

        Things are happening that I don’t even know about, let alone respond to them.

  • lostoncalantha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    GrapheneOS works great for me. Not a lot you can do on stock android that you can’t do on GrapheneOS. I would highly recommend anyone looking for privacy to look into it. Very very easy to install. Just make sure you have a Pixel phone that is unlocked. I’ve been using it as my daily driver for two years now.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      GrapheneOS isn’t a replacement for Google Photos though? What do you use for photo backups? (Immich seems like the obvious answer, but I’d like to know if there’s more options out there)

      • snrkl@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        It let’s you run Google Photos without network permissions and with storage scopes limiting it to certain folders.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Does the photo search still work offline? It doesn’t for me. That seems like it’d be the only reason to stick with that app if you’re not using the cloud storage, otherwise I might as well just use a basic file browser.

          • snrkl@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t upload my photos to the cloud, and don’t use the search function. It’s just a photo library app on the phone. It seems to do a better job of post processing the pics from my Pixel, which is why in use it.

    • qaeta@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s so easy to install! You just need to be in the 3% of smartphone owners who actually have one! EASY!

      rolls eyes

        • qaeta@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          My point is that if it requires a specific device that most people don’t have to install, then it is not easy to install for most people, because it literally cannot be.

          • Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            But it’s not for most people. It’s for Google pixel users, that’s the whole point! That’s like saying oh this diesel sucks and isn’t user friendly because it doesn’t work in my petrol car. That’s because it isn’t for your car.

            • qaeta@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Then don’t recommend it for people that can’t use it, JFC.

              • Blander_Rurton@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                No one is doing that. YOU’RE the one here that is getting angry at nothing. It’s just an option for pixel users, who are one of the only demographics locked into Google photos. Other phone users are free to use their stock photo app. You’ve clearly just misunderstood the original comment and are trying to save face.

        • qaeta@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cool, I have a Samsung S23fe, please feel free to install it for me. I’ll wait.

          Admittedly, being facetious there, but my point is that if it requires a specific device that most people don’t have to install, then it is not easy to install for most people, because it literally cannot be.

            • qaeta@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              … what exactly do you think the phase “impossibly difficult” means? Because “impossible” is a level of difficulty ie. THEY ARE NOT DIFFERENT THINGS

              • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Impossibly difficult is an oxymoron. If something is impossible, it can’t be difficult because if it is difficult that means its very hard to achieve but still possible. If something is impossible, that means you cannot do it, full stop. It is not possible. Those are two completely different things.

    • steel_for_humans@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      My only issue is with banking apps and our national ID app which is very useful. I know some work, but I haven’t seen all that I have listed, so I would have to be the guinea pig :) I actually have an older Pixel phone with a shattered screen, I was planning to have it repaired, so I guess that’s where I can test GrapheneOS safely.

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Exactly. It’s google. They’re scanning EVERYTHING. Even if you don’t use google, they probably know about you from OTHERS’ devices who are using google.

    • Rookeh@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same, I set it up a few years ago and both me and my partner have been using it since then with no issues at all, it’s completely replaced Google Photos for us.

      We’ve also set up immich-frame and repurposed an old Google Nest hub to use as a digital photo frame.

      • DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve written a python script that fetches a random image from an immich album using its API, every 30 seconds and sets it as my media pc (Ubuntu) wallpaper. Serves as a frame when no windows are open. Recently updated the code to fetch images only when the desktop has mouse focus, to save unnecessary HDD reads when I’m watching something.

    • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      The main reason why I haven’t moved to Immich is backups. Storage is Hella expensive and there’s no way I store photos without a backup.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Backblaze B2 is about $7 a month per TB.

        Almost every major backup solution natively supports S3 compatible storage.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          $7/month per TB is expensive as a data hoarder…

          Best to scope it down to documents, git and photos.

          The rest gets an onsite backup to externals.

        • markko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Obviously cloud storage is convenient, but there’s definitely better value in on-site backups.

          That works out to $84/year, which is about what you could get a 1TB HDD for.

          2 x 1TB HDDs in RAID will be much cheaper and reasonably safe in the long run.

          1TB SSDs will be even better value due to their extended lifespans, and you’d get much better speeds.

          • Toribor@corndog.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I back up to local storage and then replicate offsite to S3 nightly.

            On-prem backups are great and cheap and fast and definitely plan A but a robust backup solution is going to require offsite storage of some sort. Object storage is one of the cheapest ways to do that for most situations, particularly for things that can’t be replaced like photos.

            • markko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’d do the same if I wasn’t so tight with my money lol. I prefer having multiple on-site backups so I don’t have the subscription fees.

              If something bad enough happens to my house that it destroys all my backups then I imagine photos are not going to be very high on my list of priorities.

    • lukaro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not that difficult to setup either. If I can do it anyone with a keyboard can.

  • vratajin@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s a terrible article though and seems quite click-baity, it’s hard to say what’s going on just based on that.
    It also says

    We’re talking Personal Intelligence, Google’s latest AI upgrade path which lets users opt-in to connecting Google apps to Gemini.
    If it’s opt-in, it’s fine, as long as the user knows what exactly they are opting in for.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even when they say it’s optional, it’s never actually optional. They are always enabling it in the background and just preventing you from seeing that.

      But even if they actually did use an opt-in system properly, they would still only do that for like 6 months, and then in the next update you’d be forced to use it. And who can stop them? There is no alternative.

      • br14n@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        No alternative? Immich and Ente are definitely an alternative Google Photos. It ain’t that hard to degoogle these days.

        • cøre@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are services and websites that literally won’t let you change your email, so if you used gmail to sign up, you’re stuck with that email.

          • br14n@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Never had a website or service deny an email change in my 25 years of being on the internet. But you can move all the other stuff to a different email and keep the ones you can’t change on your gmail. Still a better choice than giving all your data to google.

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Immich definitely lets you change your email, and even if they didn’t, it’s open source and self-hostable, you could just do it yourself and submit a PR.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The way they are doing it is kind of sketchy though. They are replacing the old search functionality with Gemini and now if you click the search icon in Google photos it immediately pops up asking you to pick your own face. There’s no option to skip this step, though you can still revert to the old search for now.

      The creepy part is that when they ask you to select your face, it’s pretty clear they’ve already figured it out, because it’s the first face they show you.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Except anyone else that has ever taken my picture can opt-in for me, and I have no way of knowing if they did or not.

      • Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, but at least it’ll all be outdated and nothing new is added. And hey, maybe in the future we could get laws that force them to delete anything older than a certain date. Would leaving them there be any better?

        • Napster153@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Easier to ask for the whole internet to be reset in order to destroy all the garbage data that’s accumulating at the bottom

      • Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Like the other comment said, I did a Google takeout of my photos, then used immich-go to transfer them. Was pretty painless, got it done in a few hours, probs less if I was less dummy.

        Here’s the guide I followed.

        • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thank you! I didn’t realize you could just do a Takeout. I started the process last night and hopefully will be able to transfer them soon. It was completed relatively quickly, so I wonder if it will really have everything…

          • Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            My takeout had everything, even random shit I should’ve deleted forever ago lol. I’d just check for the most important pics (weddings, vacations, etc.) that you would actually be devestated to lose. You can always wait a month or so before deleting to verify your media transferred fine.

            • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I went ahead and deleted everything. Ended up being about ~60 GB, since I only ever used standard compressed storage. It was weird going back through all those photos, but at least I can save them locally now.

        • schmalls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          My problem is that I can’t download the whole takeout before it expires. Or some fail and they only allow so many retries to download.

          • Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Really weird, I’ve never had a takeout download limit or issue; does it fail on both .tgz and .zip versions? Maybe try just outright downloading a few batches of pics at a time and then uploading them to Immich.

            • schmalls@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ll have to give it another try and report back. I think it is like 2TB total so I didn’t have enough time to get it on my 100 Mbps. And then some of them failing and having to restart was not helping.

  • PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBIES@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s also opt in. Although I’d be surprised if anyone commenting here is actually using google photos in the first place.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also opt in

      For now.

      I’ve been dragging my feet moving to grapheneOS, but shit like this is going to encourage me to make the jump sooner than later

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’ll be quite a few of us. I have no idea of the actual demographics or whatever, but a lot of people are here just because they got shafted by reddit one too many times.

    • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Do we really trust Google’s word though? They already use machine learning on your photos to support the search feature

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Timing is insane, i took out everything and put it on my NAS 2 weeks ago. Glad i removed everything.

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Hivemind. Not the same, but I just did something similar two weeks ago, finally deleted everything from and unlinked OneDrive on my PC.

      I saw an update that started forcing through Copilot piggybacking off it and Edge with everytime back online if the updaters aren’t disabled, and I noticed it on the Photos application first where it didn’t used to exist.

      I noped tf out of that lol

      • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        One can only speculate but i deleted from the trash bin also, so i did my maximum best to remove all