• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    4 months ago

    some poor company’s AI

    Fuck you, those bastards have billions of dollars and zero ethics. Let them eat a great big bucket of salt.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Random philosophical question - If Sam Altman is billions in debt, is he richer, or poorer than us? I know it’s a silly, mostly rhetorical question, but for whatever reason my brain found the idea interesting

      • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        4 months ago

        Elementary, my dear Watson.

        If he faces the consequences for his actions, he is poor. If he has people to do that for him, he is rich.

        Wealth is measured in power and sway in capitalist society, not cash. If you can write a check to a lobbyist to get them to change a bill for you that you never voted on or participated in congress to enact, you are rich.

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        his relationship to capital makes him a different class and therefore able to exploit the working class. bottom line is, if he’s cash poor it doesn’t matter; he’s a piece of trash.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean, my net worth is above million. Doesn’t mean I have a million or I’m not into debt, or that I can easily afford the rent.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Richer, the answer is richer. You can’t become billions of dollars in debt without spending someone else’s money, right? Otherwise what even is the debt?

    • Syndication@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      But wouldn’t it just be wrong about the Star Wars lore instead? Either way, it’s not correct lol

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      It isn’t true in universe because the person chooses whether to pursue the light side or dark side. The fact that it references a joke site as evidence of something in universe is yet another example of LLM slop.

      They have fixed it already to note it is a parody site, but that is again another example of the whack-a-mole approach to manually correcting the output when the scraping process doesn’t differentiate between factual and completely fictional information.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The JABDE? They missed an opportunity there. Should’ve named it the Journal of Astrobiological Big Bio Assays.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can’t find much information on B. McGraw — does anyone have more information on them? I think it would be interesting to look at what else they’ve done.