RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 months agoJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldimagemessage-square113linkfedilinkarrow-up1672arrow-down10
arrow-up1672arrow-down1imageJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldRestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square113linkfedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·3 months agoNo, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
minus-squareZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·3 months agoMy favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
minus-squareDejected Warp Core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoAs long as it’s their autocrat, yes.
No, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
My favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
As long as it’s their autocrat, yes.