The democratic socialist Melat Kiros unseated the long-serving US representative Diana DeGette in Colorado’s primary elections held on Tuesday, the latest in a string of high-profile victories for the party’s insurgent left.

The Associated Press reported that Kiros had defeated DeGette for the Democratic nomination in the deep-blue first congressional district centered on Denver. Kiros’s triumph came a week after New York voters unseated two Democratic congressional incumbents and replaced a third who was retiring with candidates who had campaigned on standing up to Israel amid accusations that it was carrying out a genocide in Gaza.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tbh pretty accurate to the definition of the word. They’re winning in opposition to DNC authority despite all efforts to suppress them.

        • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not only that, but there’s already a term for that wing of the party: progressives. “Insurgent Left” is clearly a manufactured term concocted with the sole purpose of portraying progressives as dangerous, lawless extremists.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Remember when Jan 6th happened and all you would hear on the news is insurgency this and insurgency that? This is how they devalue the meaning of the words used against them. Now everything we don’t like is an insurgency and what happened on Jan 6th was a nothingburger.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        That was a literal armed uprising attempting to overthrow the government. “Insurgency” is a perfectly valid term. What else do you call it when a mob of people engages in open rebellion?

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Their point was that, by using the term for far less severe things, the media are devaluing it. The term is valid for the violent mob, but not for the swing in votes they’re using it for.