Germany gets a lot of (well deserved) heat for the nazis, but it is a true testament to the efficacy of propaganda investments that the US does not have a worse reputation. Even hitler wrote about how he was inspired by the US to do the things he did.
I agree with you. The US is, and always has been, a cancer on the planet more malicious than any other.
China is a socialist country, it does not have the economic compulsion towards colonization and imperialism that capitalist countries do. China gains independence from the west and potential customers by facilitating trade outside the domination of the west, that’s what it gains.
China is an oligarchy, my man. They’re better than the west for now, but the same kind of greedy bastards run their country as do the rest of ours.
Regardless of that, though, they are still operating in the “country with the most doubly so” world. So they have the incentive to fuck over other countries to enrich themselves/ promote their ideologies.
As I suspected, this is just anarcho-cynicism: human nature is evil, power is evil, there is zero difference between any nations, everything is the same, nothing matters, etc etc.
Human nature isn’t evil, it’s dumb. We can only focus on what’s in front of us because we’re inherently biased towards the self. That’s the source of billionaires, wealth inequality, and the Iron Law of Oligarchy. Humans are very much capable of overcoming this issue, but to do so we have to acknowledge that it is an issue. Putting your fingers in your ears and saying “my team knows the way” isn’t going to help anyone. Especially when it’s obvious that your team does NOT have a handle on these issues either.
I disagree that there is such thing as evil. It’s a distancing tactic for people to give space between the horrors they know humanity can do and what they believe that they’re capable of. It’s just a knock-on from tribalism and othering.
Pretending that my argument is about what you want to talk about instead of what I’m actually saying is cowardice. Like I said, China is next up which is why I’m using them as the example. But since you’re going to sit on an irrelevant thing in an attempt to make me appear like I can’t come up with an example, here are the concerning things about China right now.
They have massive income inequality. Second most billionaires of any country in the world.
They favor creating national cohesion by reducing differences between populations in their country, rather than creating a unifying national identity aimed towards some goal.
They create treaties with poorer countries that boil down to “we’ll develop the infrastructure to extract this resource in exchange for getting the extracted resource”, which is eerily close to early colonization tactics.
They have imperial ambitions on sovereign (or formerly sovereign) territories that they consider to belong to them (Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong)
I don’t think these are unique to China or even particularly egregious, but they are signs that if China gets on top they’re going to do what every other country does when they get on top. Use it to benefit their citizens at the cost of everyone else.
No, China is a socialist country. The working classes are the ones that control the state, and as a consequence policy is directed towards their interests. Capitalists exist in a cage, used primarily for the beneficial socializing aspect markets have with respect to disconnected, smaller and competitive industries.
Secondly, I have no idea what you mean by “country with the most doubly so” bit. China isn’t dominated by finance capital and does not have the economic forces compelling imperialism that the west has. Imperialism isn’t just something people do, it’s economically compelled.
China has the second most billionaires in the world, man. They can call themselves whatever they want, economic inequality like that is a clear sign of oligarchy. Or do you have some other explanation on how someone can “earn” thousands of times more than others in a supposedly fair system? If the workers own their excess, why do you still have hoarders? How do you still have hoarders?
China has the second most billionaires in the world
How about you look at it by rate as opposed to using raw numbers when comparing a country of 1.4 Billion to much smaller countries (you might then come to realize by rate China is down near India while being far more developed).
economic inequality like that is a clear sign of oligarchy
No its not. Its a symptom of a private sector (and thus some private property) continuing to exist.
If the workers own their excess, why do you still have hoarders? How do you still have hoarders?
Because the trade off was refusing to make use of market relations and remain spreading equal poverty under the Gang of Four.
I was right you really have no idea what you’re talking about.
China has capitalists, yes. This does not mean they control the economy. As I already said, capitalists exist in a cage, used primarily for the beneficial socializing aspect markets have with respect to disconnected, smaller and competitive industries. To dogmatically collectivize even highly underdeveloped industry is a misstep, which was committed by the Gang of Four.
Socialist countries like the USSR and DPRK that have more tightly controlled economies are typically this way due to encirclement and needing to defend themselves, not because this is the most sensible course for development from a Marxist perspective. Even in the USSR, Stalin had the artels, which were essentially worker cooperatives, well after the end of the NEP.
Trying to centrally plan a bunch of small businesses would be a nightmare, but it’s much easier to plan large industry. That’s why the basis of communism is large industry, and why one of the most critical tasks of any socialist country is to develop the productive forces in the best way possible. China allows limited private property for the progressive role it plays in comparison to small businesses and other petty production.
How familiar are you with Marxism? China’s economy makes perfect sense when viewed from a Marxist angle, and they are Marxist-Leninists.
Stop playing us vs them. Jumping in at the end of a conversation to declare yourself the victor on behalf of people you agree with is mastubatory at best.
I put my foot in my mouth and kept putting it back there. Doesn’t make you look better to point out how dumb I look. Trust, I know how badly I fumbled, my man.
but the same kind of greedy bastards run their country as do the rest of ours.
Western liberals can no longer defend their world order as not being evil, so they’ve fallen back to the next excuse: “everyone else is just as bad as us”. It’s just the narcissists prayer.
To be clear, this isn’t to minimize the fucked up shit, but to get people to realize that the fucked up shit is a result of the system, rather than some remarkable evil in the hearts of some “other”.
Thinking that evil is a thing that exists is a thing that we use to distance ourselves from what we’re all capable of doing. It’s better to be honest about that shit than to hide behind tribalism for comfort. “I could never do that because I’m [some in-group that’s really the same as most in-groups]”
But honestly, I’m having trouble parsing what you’re saying here. That I’m saying nothing or what?
You make a good point here, and I hadn’t thought about it that way. China is quite scary, and their dominance is certainly understated in my declaration of the US being the worst of them. I can see how my statement is exceptionalism. Despite the US having some unique cruelties, It is the authoritarian state in general having a monopoly on violent control that is the ultimate disaster.
All of Africa has been the target of so much cruelty, and china has a role in that. I am certain there are nightmares on the horizon.
Because it is an authoritarian state, and to be clear I’m more afraid of the US because of where I live. I just find any non-horizontally organized states that have a lot of power, especially authoritarian ones, to be scary in general.
All states are “authoritarian,” in that all are monopolies on violence. The benefit of China is that the working classes control the state, so its authority is used in the interest of the people.
I realize the redudancy of using the word “authoritarian” to describe something inherently authoritarian, the state. I have an open enough mind to accept that I was using the word incorrectly, there is no need to call me names.
Somewhat true, but all things considered, the US Empire is still far worse than any empire before it. There’s hardly a comparison.
As for China - I guess we’ll see soon enough. So far it’s been thousands of times better on its road to world leader status than the US has ever been. Unless it radically changes course once the US is gone, it’ll easily be a massive improvement.
And even if it does change course - it’ll still most likely be an improvement, just not necessarily a massive one. Honestly, I’ll be surprised if it ever comes close to the level of attrocities committed by the US.
Yes, because the US got to the top of the pile after most western nations were fully industrialized. We commit atrocities on a scale never before seen… because we have the capability to do so, not because we’re uniquely evil. Do you really think the British wouldn’t be doing the same shit we are if they’d been capable of it in the 18th century?
most evil empire in history
Germany gets a lot of (well deserved) heat for the nazis, but it is a true testament to the efficacy of propaganda investments that the US does not have a worse reputation. Even hitler wrote about how he was inspired by the US to do the things he did.
I agree with you. The US is, and always has been, a cancer on the planet more malicious than any other.
Removed by mod
China is a socialist country, it does not have the economic compulsion towards colonization and imperialism that capitalist countries do. China gains independence from the west and potential customers by facilitating trade outside the domination of the west, that’s what it gains.
China is an oligarchy, my man. They’re better than the west for now, but the same kind of greedy bastards run their country as do the rest of ours.
Regardless of that, though, they are still operating in the “country with the most doubly so” world. So they have the incentive to fuck over other countries to enrich themselves/ promote their ideologies.
But like. What have they actually done that is so scary?
They are not white, reeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaally scary!!!
Please don’t strawman. Thanks
Strawman of what? The blanks you left others to fill in for you?
Removed by mod
So you don’t have an example.
As I suspected, this is just anarcho-cynicism: human nature is evil, power is evil, there is zero difference between any nations, everything is the same, nothing matters, etc etc.
Human nature isn’t evil, it’s dumb. We can only focus on what’s in front of us because we’re inherently biased towards the self. That’s the source of billionaires, wealth inequality, and the Iron Law of Oligarchy. Humans are very much capable of overcoming this issue, but to do so we have to acknowledge that it is an issue. Putting your fingers in your ears and saying “my team knows the way” isn’t going to help anyone. Especially when it’s obvious that your team does NOT have a handle on these issues either.
I disagree that there is such thing as evil. It’s a distancing tactic for people to give space between the horrors they know humanity can do and what they believe that they’re capable of. It’s just a knock-on from tribalism and othering.
Pretending that my argument is about what you want to talk about instead of what I’m actually saying is cowardice. Like I said, China is next up which is why I’m using them as the example. But since you’re going to sit on an irrelevant thing in an attempt to make me appear like I can’t come up with an example, here are the concerning things about China right now.
They have massive income inequality. Second most billionaires of any country in the world.
They favor creating national cohesion by reducing differences between populations in their country, rather than creating a unifying national identity aimed towards some goal.
They create treaties with poorer countries that boil down to “we’ll develop the infrastructure to extract this resource in exchange for getting the extracted resource”, which is eerily close to early colonization tactics.
They have imperial ambitions on sovereign (or formerly sovereign) territories that they consider to belong to them (Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong)
I don’t think these are unique to China or even particularly egregious, but they are signs that if China gets on top they’re going to do what every other country does when they get on top. Use it to benefit their citizens at the cost of everyone else.
Wrong. Here’s some sources:
Is China State Capitalist?
No, China is a socialist country. The working classes are the ones that control the state, and as a consequence policy is directed towards their interests. Capitalists exist in a cage, used primarily for the beneficial socializing aspect markets have with respect to disconnected, smaller and competitive industries.
Secondly, I have no idea what you mean by “country with the most doubly so” bit. China isn’t dominated by finance capital and does not have the economic forces compelling imperialism that the west has. Imperialism isn’t just something people do, it’s economically compelled.
China has the second most billionaires in the world, man. They can call themselves whatever they want, economic inequality like that is a clear sign of oligarchy. Or do you have some other explanation on how someone can “earn” thousands of times more than others in a supposedly fair system? If the workers own their excess, why do you still have hoarders? How do you still have hoarders?
How about you look at it by rate as opposed to using raw numbers when comparing a country of 1.4 Billion to much smaller countries (you might then come to realize by rate China is down near India while being far more developed).
No its not. Its a symptom of a private sector (and thus some private property) continuing to exist.
Because the trade off was refusing to make use of market relations and remain spreading equal poverty under the Gang of Four.
I was right you really have no idea what you’re talking about.
China has capitalists, yes. This does not mean they control the economy. As I already said, capitalists exist in a cage, used primarily for the beneficial socializing aspect markets have with respect to disconnected, smaller and competitive industries. To dogmatically collectivize even highly underdeveloped industry is a misstep, which was committed by the Gang of Four.
Socialist countries like the USSR and DPRK that have more tightly controlled economies are typically this way due to encirclement and needing to defend themselves, not because this is the most sensible course for development from a Marxist perspective. Even in the USSR, Stalin had the artels, which were essentially worker cooperatives, well after the end of the NEP.
Trying to centrally plan a bunch of small businesses would be a nightmare, but it’s much easier to plan large industry. That’s why the basis of communism is large industry, and why one of the most critical tasks of any socialist country is to develop the productive forces in the best way possible. China allows limited private property for the progressive role it plays in comparison to small businesses and other petty production.
How familiar are you with Marxism? China’s economy makes perfect sense when viewed from a Marxist angle, and they are Marxist-Leninists.
Lol, it’s so cute when you guys play world-weary badass with zero knowledge of the world to even be weary of.
Stop playing us vs them. Jumping in at the end of a conversation to declare yourself the victor on behalf of people you agree with is mastubatory at best.
I put my foot in my mouth and kept putting it back there. Doesn’t make you look better to point out how dumb I look. Trust, I know how badly I fumbled, my man.
Hey you know what , then I gotta give you credit. I’m used to people who double, triple, quadruple down
Really showing you have exactly 0 (or in fact possibly a negative) understanding of China, and the Chinese state.
Western liberals can no longer defend their world order as not being evil, so they’ve fallen back to the next excuse: “everyone else is just as bad as us”. It’s just the narcissists prayer.
This is like a 6hrs documentary about
To be clear, this isn’t to minimize the fucked up shit, but to get people to realize that the fucked up shit is a result of the system, rather than some remarkable evil in the hearts of some “other”.
Thinking that evil is a thing that exists is a thing that we use to distance ourselves from what we’re all capable of doing. It’s better to be honest about that shit than to hide behind tribalism for comfort. “I could never do that because I’m [some in-group that’s really the same as most in-groups]”
But honestly, I’m having trouble parsing what you’re saying here. That I’m saying nothing or what?
You make a good point here, and I hadn’t thought about it that way. China is quite scary, and their dominance is certainly understated in my declaration of the US being the worst of them. I can see how my statement is exceptionalism. Despite the US having some unique cruelties, It is the authoritarian state in general having a monopoly on violent control that is the ultimate disaster.
All of Africa has been the target of so much cruelty, and china has a role in that. I am certain there are nightmares on the horizon.
How exactly is China “quite scary?”
Because it is an authoritarian state, and to be clear I’m more afraid of the US because of where I live. I just find any non-horizontally organized states that have a lot of power, especially authoritarian ones, to be scary in general.
All states are “authoritarian,” in that all are monopolies on violence. The benefit of China is that the working classes control the state, so its authority is used in the interest of the people.
Thanks for the correction here, as I had a misunderstanding of what the word “authoritarian” is describing.
No worries!
As opposed to those non-horizontally organised, non-authoritarian ones, you absolute dumbass.
I realize the redudancy of using the word “authoritarian” to describe something inherently authoritarian, the state. I have an open enough mind to accept that I was using the word incorrectly, there is no need to call me names.
This is just “having a government” and unfortunately you’re gonna find it in every country for as long as class society exists.
I agree that it will be everywhere under these conditions, and I agree that it is unfortunate :(
“Yes the US has committed massive real evil, but China makes me feel scared, which is just as bad!”
Somewhat true, but all things considered, the US Empire is still far worse than any empire before it. There’s hardly a comparison.
As for China - I guess we’ll see soon enough. So far it’s been thousands of times better on its road to world leader status than the US has ever been. Unless it radically changes course once the US is gone, it’ll easily be a massive improvement.
And even if it does change course - it’ll still most likely be an improvement, just not necessarily a massive one. Honestly, I’ll be surprised if it ever comes close to the level of attrocities committed by the US.
Yes, because the US got to the top of the pile after most western nations were fully industrialized. We commit atrocities on a scale never before seen… because we have the capability to do so, not because we’re uniquely evil. Do you really think the British wouldn’t be doing the same shit we are if they’d been capable of it in the 18th century?
Belgium and Spain would like a word.
Seriously, everyone forgets about what Belgium did in the Congo. They really went for quality over quantity with the atrocities there.
I feel like you have to have a pretty naive view of human history to get close to thinking thats true.
Quite the opposite, actually