• yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    15 days ago

    A 24hr waiting period to use a competitor’s product has to be one of the most blatant anti-competitive behaviour in history.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      If only the founding fathers had written the right to bear apps shall not be infringed in an amendment.

      Oh well can’t change the ancient text now, just have to be governed by it forever. 🤷 (It’s a shame the ancient powder-wigged wizards that wrote the constitution weren’t clairvoyant.)

      • Bacano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        15 days ago

        If only there were some way to change the ancient text. Some sort of amend-sion. Surely our benevolent leaders would have figured something like that out by now. I guess we’ll just have to keep voting and hoping every four years

      • Cactus_Head@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I am not from the US but can’t you interpret the first amendment in a way that would work here?

        Code is just information and you could argue that a platform is infringing on private free speech.

        • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          i am American, and yes we have a long history of interpretation that is expansive. the problem is we have narrow minded people running the institutions now who don’t even want the narrow interpretations to be in effect so they do everything possible to limit them.

          if you pay attention long enough you will see them use one argument to get their way, then later use the opposite to get their way on a different issue. there is no moral consistency because morality is just s tool to them.

    • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I‘m curious I read the petition and didn‘t see mention of „24h waiting“ anywhere could you tell me what you‘re referring to?

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Welcome to McDonald’s credit! You’ll have to wait 24hrs if you want to eat that Whopper you want to buy!

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    15 days ago

    please just make an android alternative

    I want a phone that isn’t a closed ecosystem race to the bottom shit phone

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      15 days ago

      There are, but the market is rigged by monopolists. And things like banks increasingly require apps that won’t even run on customer Android ROMs easily.

      The regulators are needed here.

      • lemmysmash@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        15 days ago

        The problem with regulators is that they a) gladly suck corporate dicks, b) gladly opt-in for the same authoritarian methods of population control, and c) gladly ignore common sense altogether.

        • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          15 days ago

          “a” has a name: regulatory capture.

          Regulators have in the past fulfilled their role, they’ve just been hamstrung.

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          That is also because we let the companies get too big. We need to break them up. The market is completely dysfunctional. It is feudalism right now.

    • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’m pretty sure that custom roms will remove that 24hr wait period from their binaries. Android is still open source and removing a check isn’t going to be very hard for them.

      The tech ecosystem is as open as you can. Use linux. Use SearxNG. Use graphene or other custom roms. There’s options out there, you just have to start adopting them instead of just complaining online about having no choice.

        • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I might have misunderstood that all those years, but custom roms like graphene or lineage all use the AOSP source to build “their” stuff on top. Android itself is all the proprietary shit google adds and probably bunch of proprietary firmware drivers, which isn’t relevant in the slightest if you switch to a supported device.

            • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Yeah, that’s roughly what I thought, in which case switching to graphene (or any other custom rom) would completely “release” you from the proprietary grasp of google and their genius ideas. Because even if they add this 24hr lockdown in the AOSP-Project, graphene could rather easiely revert that change in their fork.

      • EastofEdson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        Google reCaptcha enters the chat.

        This whole APK dicussion is important, but Google is taking steps to lock down the bloody internet if you aren’t on a verified iOS or Android device. This will be far reaching going way beyond the APK changes.

        related article

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        Not everybody has a choice. I’m currently on grapheneos, but it looks like I may be forced back to android due to national ID requirements.

        • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          I guess one solution to that is to have a second used or ultra low cost phone just for your personal ID and banking stuff. But then it’s no longer really mobile lol.

        • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          If your country forces you on a locked down OS for ID requirements, something is wrong entirely. You should absolutely make some noise against that and urge them to allow custom OS. That’s a political issue, not a technical.

            • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              Shit country tbh. You might be able to get a cheap stock android device for your ID and your “actual” device keeps living the good life on a custom rom. Idk how feasible that is for your lifestyle tho.

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    15 days ago

    I genuinely appreciate the cause, but to sign this, I have to provide PII, agree to their terms of service and privacy policy, and get automatically opted-in to their mailing list that I’ll have to unsubscribe from later.

    So to petition against this shitty tech stuff, I have to go through this other shitty tech stuff. It sucks how normalized this all has become.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        14 days ago

        Google doesn’t give a shit about what you want. It only understands two things: credible legal threats and not giving them your money.

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’m saying I don’t want to buy a new thing, so saying “just buy new phone” doesn’t really help for a lot of people

          • eleitl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            These people are screwed, then. You can’t expect an uncaring universe to accomodate your wishes, if you’re not willing to move yourself. Stopping using stuff is always an option that doesn’t cost money.

    • Cactus_Head@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Most of the world can’t afford to buy one specific android and hope not to brick it. Most people can’t afford a google pixel and if they can, aren’t going to risk it.

      And what happens when google cuts off third party tools like MicroG. I need WhatsApp for almost everything from talking to family and friends to Work. Most of the world does, and the same is true for Facebook.

      • alfredon996@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 days ago

        Most people can’t afford a google pixel and if they can, aren’t going to risk it.

        And they shouldn’t. By buying Pixels you are supporting Google, the same company that is destroying Android freedom.

        Today’s best alternatives are phones that come preloaded with custom ROMs (Brax3, Fairphone, Murena, Iodé, and so on), or if you’re feeling more adventurous, a Linux phone (I have heard good things about FuriLabs FLX1).

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Most Linux phones are android phones that have a Linux rom available to them, hence why they said most people wouldn’t risk what they spent a lot of money on

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        Then you are fucked right? What’s app and Facebook have you.

        I too live somewhere this is expected. I said no. I won’t do it. Facebook is easy, because whatever.

        WhatsApp is harder even the doctors want to use it. But I won’t. Someone has to start saying no.

      • trilobite@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        “I need WhatsApp for almost everything from talking to family and friends to Work. Most of the world does, and the same is true for Facebook.”

        Whatsapp and Facebook bring convienence for sure, but you can live without them. All those that know me, know i refuse to use Whatapp. Those that want to keep up with me have installed Signal. I admit that for business it can be tricky but we have to start somewhere?

  • l3mming@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    15 days ago

    The number of times that signing an online petition has prevented the plans of an evil corporation is exactly zero.

    • coredev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 days ago

      I am not so sure. It creats activity, being passive is worse. We should encourage all type of protests, even petitions.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 days ago

      There are already some movements, like #Keep Android Open that ask to contact local regulators and law makers, this petition is useful to have a concrete number of people that agree and that can be used officially

    • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 days ago

      Companies have reversed unpopular decisions in the past (just saw a thing about Facebook reversing some AI thing). So there may be some possible chance of them reversing this decision. I’m not hopeful but the cost is cheap, and it has a better chance of success than doing nothing

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I agree. Doesn’t do anything it would be better to get people to buy stock in the company and vote on what you want. Get enough people and you can make change.

      But that process is also… Gross. And expensive.

  • Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    14 days ago

    Mandate that all boot loaders can be unlocked by consumers/device owners!

    That single change alone would open the floodgates of development.

    Manufacturer locked boot loaders was the single biggest mistake made in the phone world. Now just consider all the work it’ll take to reverse that simple misstep made years ago that nobody gave a single thought to.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      15 days ago

      Petitions are useless

      Protests are useless

      Governments and corporations conspire to implement surveilance knowing what comes next

      <-- we are here

      Actual resistence

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      15 days ago

      That is simply wrong. Public pressure can certainly be effective. In any case, it’s definitely better than doing nothing at all.

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 days ago

          The petition is only one part of the puzzle.

          Keep Android Open also says to contact your regulators and fill out Google’s developer verification survey, both of which either directly affect Google by influencing internal processes, or put regulatory pressure on them to back off.

          The Change.org petition is moreso just a way to count overall total supporters, and add one more lever of pressure that can be leveled against them. (e.g. instead of “we’ve had a lot of people contact regulators” it’s “218,000 people are actively taking the time to tell you they don’t like this”, can be cited by lawmakers, advocacy groups, etc)

          That said though, I do agree that a change.org petition on its own is… generally ineffective most of the time.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    I don’t get it, how tf they gonna stop you on phones that already exist?

    A. You can disable any new OS or device updates from Google.

    B. You can keep your existing phone on Android 16 or prior (hell, I’m on 12)

    C. Use alt OS like Graphene, Lineage, Iodé, /e/OS, CalyxOS (they’re back!!), etc

    D. Sign out of Google on your phone, install F-Droid or something from APK package on FF derived browser.

    I’m sure on brands new devices with that patch, plus anyone who doesn’t disable the auto updates will be blocked. But no way no how can Google stop us all!! 🖕🖕🏻🖕🏿🖕🏼

    • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 days ago

      A. It’s not an OS update. It’s part of Google Play Services.
      B. I’m pretty sure this applies even on Android 12 because it’s Google Play Services. Years back, Google started moving functionality like this into Google Play Services so your phone could get new features even if you had a bad manufacturer and OS updates were months or even years behind. It was introduced as a feature then.
      C. This does work, but some apps (notably banking apps) block non-Google Android, even if there is no legitimate security reason for doing so. This will vary by OS and even phones running the same OS. Official GrapheneOS builds for officially supported devices probably have the best compatibility with apps in terms of the apps not blocking your phone. Maybe there are some rooted phones that patch apps to bypass “integrity” checks. Some features of your phone just will not work, even if you have a third-party OS with official support for your phone (contactless payments). Hopefully the EU gets on this and at least Europeans or people who can trick their phones into thinking they are Europeans will get some of their control back.
      D. Most people can’t live without the apps that are available only on Google’s store or that require Google Play Services. That’s most apps. Even if you don’t need those specific apps, you will need to deal with other stuff like setting up Unified Push if you want to receive timely notifications. My parents are not going to set up a Unified Push gateway.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Most people can’t live without the apps that are available only on Google’s store or that require Google Play Services

        Example of that: governments apps, like the eID app for the european eID (which, it’s not a must for everyone but it may be for some specific people or just everyone in a country)

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think the goal is to push it silently as a Google system service, rather than wait for manufacturers to ship an OS or app store update.

      There’s a real possibility your phone already has Android Developer Verifier installed and sitting dormant until enforcement begins.

      You can check for the package now:

      “com.google.android.verifier”

      If it’s there…well…

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        Try to uninstall it with ADB if it’s already installed on ya phone, i use ShizuTools personally

        • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Like herpes, it comes back :) The second you connect to WiFi or mobile data…

          If you want to avoid it - for good - you need to install CFW. Or you need to play whackamole with firewalls. But those come with other issues.

          Big evil knows what they’re doing - switching it off and on again won’t fool em for long (if at all) :(

          • quick_snail@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            No, it doesn’t come back. Google will not be installed by default.

            I’ve never had it on my phone because I never add gapps when installing Android.

            • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Well sure, if you’re installing CFW or aosp and you don’t need the ever increasing cruft that seems to rely on Play store authentication. Never install GApps, done.

              Some folks (not you or I) need to access play store to install their apps (I think even WhatsApp and Signal need it now; I couldn’t install it on my phone), 2FA, transport apps, bank apps etc.

              Catch 22 for them.

              • degoogled phone…but can’t install all the apps they need
              • Google ecosystem… but at whims of Google.
              • quick_snail@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                Nah, and when this deadline hits, we’ll see even more people forced to remove gapps.

                And there will be a larger user base that won’t be able to use that cruft shady apps that depend on it

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    let’s get real…google isn’t going to stop. why would they? there’s zero repercussions for their aggressive strategy against their own consumers.

    so stop using their products. cut google out, entirely.

      • gankouskhan@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Monopoly over me not paying for their stuff? I guess. Seems more like not supporting them to me. If they errode my choice then I make the only choice that gives me agency. I don’t give them my money.

  • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Start working on a Cydia-like app for android or graphene. Look into the development of how to code an open source repository style app store that’s accessible through custom firmware. if one person can make one for the iphone via a custom firmware then, we can 100% do the same with android.

  • epyon22@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Really starting to wonder what they signed with apple to get RCS. Seems to be they sold the soul of android.

      • epyon22@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Google apple agreed to increase android security for the deployment of RCS to both platforms. This directly looked like enforcing root detection and safety net(now play integrity) enforcement to use RCS. I’m speculating restricting side loading is also part of that agreement. It would make sense considering it’s forbidden on apple.

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 days ago

          Sorry, but do you have a source for this at all?

          As far as I can tell, they have added some Play Integrity checks (with root detection being part of that), but the reason was cited as spam prevention, and I can’t find anything claiming they had any sort of agreement with Apple to do so.

          They kept pushing for Apple to implement it, but I don’t know of any cases of them making any promises about what they’d do on their own platform in order to convince Apple or anything like that.

          • epyon22@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            I cannot find my source unfortunately poked around a bit. Unfortunately this article was better than even the ones I was finding.

  • Alph4d0g@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Maybe it’s already been said in so many words but I bought the OnePlus One when it was released and it was kick-ass compelling hardware that happened to have Cyanogen mod. I emphasize the hardware aspect because this is a draw for many people. People were talking about it. If you get a certain percentage of the public drooling over some eye candy they might be more openness to something like a Linux phone. Of course it’s always a spectrum and some people - like many here - are more swayed by software alone and that’s awesome too.