• fireweed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          There are also a lot of non-native English speakers here. English is a tricky enough language when used sincerely, then add to that the fact that we English natives are huge fans of sarcasm, and I’m surprised misunderstandings don’t happen more often. (I had major culture shock moving to Japan and finding out sarcasm was not really a thing there. I always assumed it was part of the human condition.)

          • robear@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 days ago

            Japanese people can be just as sarcastic as English speakers. It flies over your head unless you’re actually good at the language. Same as English.

            • fireweed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              I should have said they have their own type of sarcasm but it’s different; you wouldn’t, for instance, respond to a simple question with the obvious opposite of the truth (e.g. “I just love the cold” when asked if you like winter).

  • ProfThadBach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 days ago

    Oh that’s just like the DNC. They never fight. Just look at the North Carolina dnc. Tim Moore is up for reelection and the woman they have put up against him they have done absolutely nothing to get her message out or their message out or any message out. I have only seen one little tiny sign at the Democratic headquarters and then a big ass Roy Cooper sign. They have no fight in them at all. And their whole mantra is vote blue no matter who what choice do I have not vote?

    • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 days ago

      Voting for a third party is only valid if a movement, a real one, forms around it. It will never work if it only siphons votes out of the dem bucket and lets republicans to kind of win by default. It has to have real momentum, real commitments, have visibility and voice across the states, so everyone will know they will not be just giving the republicans the win, rather, committing together as a big one, to something better. Even better if the various ideologically motivated but distinct camps within republicans would join the effort. Libertarians are the classic example, but I bet if things get momentum and it looks like the two parties are simply getting fractured either way, a lot of people will jump on the chance to get actual real representation and voice, not just a small camp within a big ambiguous mess the two parties kind of force.

      So instead of just voting for a third option and wasting your vote in the current system, organizing would be the real answer, the prerequisite for the third options to be valid. And it’s not that complicated, just needs to get viral and real commitments

      • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        I think we just need to put up everyday, regular workers who refuse PAC money and operate ethically, as well as presenting a socialist platform. That would overcome a lot of disillusionment with left voters and even poor MAGA, who were betrayed by the neoliberal establishment; who thought Trump would bring socialist elements and advocate for them. I think this would build enough broad support to win.

        People are broadly tired of political corruption and capitalist exploitation; they’ve just been brainwashed by the Epstein class to blame socialism.

        Also, we need to arm up for the plan B. The SRA is one organizational resource.

        • Malyca@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          And practice with your weapons. Fancy guns will not make you better unless you’re already decent to begin with. I recommend CZ, good guns, not too expensive.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Waiting for a third party person to get support before you support them kills any chance of a movement right away. Until then, you just get the center-right using the far-right boogeyman.

        We have a viable third party here in Canada but people’s main excuse “they’ll never win”. Like, no shit, you keep saying you like their platform so fucking DO something about it!

        The dumbest thing for the US specifically is that there IS a movement forming. Progressives are winning primaries, Mamdani is fixing NYC in record time and pulling no punches, and people are getting excited about it even in other countries. It’s all there, and if you vote against that what the fuck do you think is going to happen? If you aren’t part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.

        • Folstar@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Waiting for a third party person to get support before you support them kills any chance of a movement right away

          Tell us you didn’t read what you’re replying to without telling us.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Literally jusy start with the first sentence, dude. It’s ok, take your time, but maybe next time don’t come at me with your raging first grade reading level(is it even that? Their comment was pretty clear).

            • Folstar@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Voting for a third party is only valid if a movement, a real one, forms around it.

              This? You seem to be using voting and support interchangeably? There is a heck of a lot more you can do to support a movement than waiting around until voting day.

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I am, because that is how it works. I’m from Canada, one party is progressive, then we have two other parties which amount to northern copies of the DNC and GOP. We have other small ones. People’s main excuse for not voting for the progressive party is “they can’t win” and we refer to their seats in parliament to show that because we’re largely cowards.

                People have a hard time seeing what “support” is, but everyone can see the spread of MPs(member of congress, essentially) and they make choices based on that. People will look me in my real face and say “I wanted to vote NDP but I neeeeeeded to vote against the Conservatives” and now our forests are on fire and our Prime Minister is sucking Trump’s dick, fighting our unions, and handing over taxpayer money to oil and gas companies or real-estate developers(don’t worry, they’re not doing anything to ease the cost of living).

                If you do not vote for something then you are voting against it. Maybe you’re ok with that, maybe you deem it worth it, but you need to accept that reality and what it shows everyone else.

                • Folstar@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Ah, operating how you wish the system works (and how it could work with modest reform) instead of how it actually works. Skipping steps always turns out great!

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 days ago

    Ppl don’t want to win, they want someone else to win for them, which is how we got in this mess in the first place. American Democracy, in practice, encourages the notion that someone else will work on your interests, on your behalf, without requiring sustained effort on your part. We let elected official operate largely in secret and with zero oversite from those they represent, for 4 years.

    Until the electorate is able and willing to sustain oversite over the actions of their elected officials, with the tools necessary to step in and influence or remove their representatives, if needed, then there is no power outside voting every 4 years.

    • bagsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Agreed, freedom aint free. I truly believe this, even if I get down voted every single time I say it.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      You can replace “American Democracy” with “Electoralism”.

      The electorate will always be at the whim of those in power under this type of system because that is the fundamental nature of hierarchy.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    We won’t win without organization. With that we need some white populist candidates. Wtf is wrong that we have 0 white populist left candidates?

    Seriously, something is wrong.

    • Folstar@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Sorry, I would help you out there but I was banned from r/democrats for saying Biden shouldn’t run for re-election and was spoken to like a child and made persona non grata at my local democratic party meeting for saying we should actually get people on the ballot in every race. Granted, the later was over a decade ago so maybe some non-asshole non-idiots have started to show up.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Unless you’re Gen Z or Millennial, in which case you eat crayons and shove your thumb up your ass because you don’t wanna take a few hours off of work to go vote against the 4th Reich.

    We won’t have victory until the younger voter demographic finally usurps the fossils who actually show up to the polls.

    • Cherries@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 days ago

      I agree with the sentiment that voting is very important, so it’s vital to come up with ways increase voter turnout. In an ideal society, everyone would make informed voting decisions, but we don’t live in that world. We’ve seen from recent races that people are coming out in droves to vote for candidates with progressive policies with primary races having higher turnout than even general presidential elections. The key takeaway from this summer seems to be that progressive policies fuel voter turnout, especially amongst younger voters, so the Democratic Party should lean further in that direction.