• AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    The machine gun was an imperialist and fascist technology of oppression. But call it a Kalashnikov and it becomes a tool for liberation.

    Do not listen to neoliberal fuckai morons. Think for yourself what tools you can use or not. If machine generated AI slop is indistinguishable from real human “art”, then it was never art but human slop to begin with. What generations of rom-coms and participation trophies does to a people’s ego.

    Push for meaningful regulation of AI instead of endless whining and villifying people like e.g. non-capitalist china does: https://regulations.ai/regulations/china-summary

    • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      China is capitalist this has been settled by Chinese capitalists claiming China is capitalist. It could be up for debate but the homelanders are almost definitely going to come out on top where .ml’s are seen as reality challenged individuals. So while I agree with your first 2 sentences I am going to challenge your propaganda attempt. Oh does only a certain class get true capitalism?

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I see. So using it to cure cancer has to be stopped in its tracks now cuz you had a shallow political opinion.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Read it again. Post says AI. all AI not just LLM.

            like i said: shallow political opinions. just so you idiots can rage bait. this is pathetic.

            • it_wasnt_arson
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              I think there’s a pretty clear implication of referring to generative AI specifically when lay people use the term at this point, especially when creative labor is mentioned.

  • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hate clankers as much as the next person, and providing money to war profiteering should obviously be avoided with great priority…

    But really? This is a wild comparison on so many levels. There are ways to use AI ethically, and there are ways to use it unethically, amd blinding yourself to that conversation is willful ignorance.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This should be obvious.

      Using AI to detect cancer early? Using AI to help find new beneficial medications? Using AI to advance materials science? Great! Things like these are absolutely what we need more of.

      Using AI to steal massive amounts of content made by non-consenting parties and regurgitate for AI corp profits? Using corporate algorithms to manipulate output to generate results favoring corporate billionaire owners economically and politically? Using it to make sexual photos of non-consenting women and underage girls? Using it to find ways to deny coverage, strip more money from people, wage war, attack intelligence and discourse, and remove accountability for corporate owners? Fuck that.

      Guess which ones the oligarchs prefer.

      • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well said! It’s almost as if the conversation is being intentionally moved to ‘YES AI’ (sexy future times) vs 'NO AI (Luddite, dumb, regressive) instead of what every conversation is actually about, which is that morality should never be allowed to be determined by wealth.

    • raspirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Honestly I’d say it’s a pretty apt comparison. Pledging to defend your rights while avoiding using anything labeled “AI” because fascists use it is about as smart as pledging to defend your rights without using guns because fascists use them.

    • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      AI != LLM != LLM chatbots.

      But in this case the use of “AI” means “LLM chatbots”, nobody is really making an argument against other kinds of AI, like what is used to detect cancer (there is an argument to be made about having a black box in a medical context, but this is not the place for it).

    • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Absolutely. I’ve softened my stance a lot recently. I think local llm are fine. The data has already been crunched the books destroyed and the water used so I may as well play with one locally. If you set realistic uses as a tool its fine. Need a quick script great at that. Summarize some notes, or search through them also great. Not really into image gen or anything else but anything helping me get dumb stuff out of the way for just myself its a W. I’m not down with using it for public facing stuff.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    This “purism” is the reason why they keep winning. Letting only them using the most powerful tech humanity ever made is just like not voting for Harris because of Gaza. Look the mess we are now. How much we need to lose to stop this purism?

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Remember that time Hitler didn’t trust atomic bomb research because it was “Jew technology” that was awesome for the world.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    “AI = fascist?” Come on, let’s not dilute the term “fascist” to mean “anything I don’t like.” THAT kind of thinking is the weapon of the enemy!

    • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      LLM chatbots are designed to isolate you from the people around you, from other people online and from actual sources of knowledge, making it harder to build people power and actual community.

      It is pretty inherent to these chatbots too, as they are basically a replacement to search engine (which themselves were replacements to indeces), otherwise they don’t serve a real purpose, that is to say there is no well defined problem it is a solution too.

  • Waffelmeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I don’t think AI is anti-ethical or fascist per se. As many argued here, you can run it locally, you can train it on public data sets, etc.

    But there is another problem that is hardly mentioned. Let’s call it a culturally negative feedback loop. AI is different from any other tool because it pretends to be an universal tool. It can generate music, pictures, videos, text, code. If we as a society outsource all those skills to automatisation, there’s a real danger we unlearn those skills.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ultimately we’ll just unlearn thinking, why bother making any decision or have any critical thoughts yourself when you can outsource it to the AI.

  • deft@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    This post is a little silly. Weapons like swords, guns, etc are the original fascist weapons.

  • Jay🚩@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Use tech or fund tech like Zig Programming language, Haiku OS , NetBSD which have Anti AI policies

  • abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Yes, this is good. Keep doing everything you can to make yourselves weaker.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      to make yourselves weaker.

      Considering that reliance on AI weakens people’s critical thinking skills, I’m curious what your reasoning is here.

      • abc@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Perhaps we’re thinking of different things. I’m not talking about using it to do your homework or to read books for you.

        Practical example: I’ve been thinking about making my own programming language for 20 years. This year, I was able to. Did my thinking skills diminish this year when I did something I couldn’t have been arsed to do over that long time?

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Aren’t they taking a loss on every AI operation? Like a big loss. So use enough, especially free versions, and you will drive them to bankruptcy. Lol

    • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      They can just make more money to keep the bubble from popping. There is a limit to that but how much damage to the environment will they do before that point?

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        If by make more money, you mean get more investment capital from the wealthy… they can. And those people who have their money in these companies when the bubble bursts will lose a very large portion of it.

        • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          That yes but also the government will print money for a bailout like they did for the automotives and banks years ago. But they can only do that once or twice. Too big to fail is still the rule of law in american echo gnomics.

    • zbyte64
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Didn’t we say the same about Twitter being bought? Running it at a loss is okay for them as long as they use it to control the markets in other ways to make a profit.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The amount of loss here is magnitudes larger. And the difference is that companies like twitter and amazon ran at a loss while they poured money into infrastructure that they get to keep, and use. AI companies are spending most of the money on consumables. Depending on which, they will have some server assets and such. But when the bubble bursts, those wll be worth a lot less as everyone will be trying to offload them. Also, twitter wasn’t riding a bubble.