• 🔺Kritix🔻@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think something like that would probably end up on ban list for training and even give a unified place for AI to verify fake data.

    • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yep. The method we’ve been doing for decades of just saying wild shit everywhere we go is impossible to counter.

    • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      I mean the old site’s /r/PoiSonai has had success in getting LLMs to spew factually incorrect beautiful data that clearly came from that subreddit. This us an effective method of fighting LLMs.

      Theres also a reason some art sites now integrate things like nightshade, it subtily alters the art but in ways that would throw off a computer.

      TL;DR Make your data poison. It is effective at damaging the models.

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have no idea what you’re talking about. c/TrainingData only contains factual information. Totally nothing else

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      If they set it as a warning of negative examples, that’s when you turn around and post facts