• clucose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not really. You don‘t want people get bored at their job. That comes with a lot of other problems if this happens.

    Payment is according to the job level not according to the qualification.

    • Funwayguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      You want to tell developers from mass layoffs trying to pay rent that they would be ‘bored’ in a lower paying job? Or they are effectively blacklisted for being ‘overqualified’ in a slop addicted job market that refuses to pay for that expertise?

      Excuse me but fuck all that. HR can absolutely make it clear if there is no-expectation of upward movement or pay increase for the job. Sure HR can and should give lesser experienced applicants a chance if they meet the criteria, but outright denying one based on being ‘over-qualified’ is, and always has been, bullshit.

      • boudica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m as frustrated with this job market as anyone but let’s be realistic. Filling a role takes a lot of time and energy. Nobody involved in the process wants to repeat it in a few weeks or months. They have every incentive not to waste time with applicants that have any reason not to stick around.

      • clucose@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I didn’t want to hurt your feelings. I explained the situation coming from the other side.

        HR or the department are looking for longtime employees. Since everyone has to be trained to the company standards etc. This takes sometimes years. Time and energy which is “wasted” when the employee leaves right when they become self reliant.

        Nobody is working in an underqualified and underpaid job for years.