Nice Ad hominem, how about you actually engage with the argument instead of retreating to the liberal psychosis of the “Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is A Robot” conspiracy?
??? Your comment is an actual ad hominem, do you not know what the words you use mean? An ad hominem is not just “when someone insults you” it is when someone dismisses the argument presented based on the perceived value of the character of the person making the argument - As you did when you failed to engage with the actual argument given and instead talked about some psychotic “bots and tankies”. You have to actually present an argument in order to for me to hit you with an ad hominem, which you’ve failed to do, which is what I pointed out.
Now you then also go on and move the goalposts. You and I have not discussed whatever it is you’re trying to discuss, in fact we’re discussing your failure to engage with someone who did discuss that with you. So why would I want to? You’ve so far shown you’re completely incapable.
'Awww look at me, I’m so full of decorum! Why won’t you debate with me: a not bad faith actor!"
Why am I seeing this idiotic tactic lately from obvious wumaos? It’s obviously not a coincidence. How about telling Xi not to inflict ad hominem to Uyghurs.
Yeah man, I’m all decorum, that’s why I’m pointing out what a dipshit you are. I’m not even trying to debate you, you idiot. I’m trying to get you to stop being the laziest variant of a redditor possible.
Why am I seeing this idiotic tactic lately from obvious wumaos?
Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is A Filthy Foreigner
How about telling Xi not to inflict ad hominem to Uyghurs.
I don’t know him, but if I did I would if he were doing that, but he isn’t, so I wouldn’t, if I knew him. How about reading the actual report? How about looking into anything beyond what you pick up through cultural osmosis in your racist echochamber?
Nice Ad hominem, how about you actually engage with the argument instead of retreating to the liberal psychosis of the “Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is A Robot” conspiracy?
Nice ad hominem. How about saying that to those in Uyghur concentration camps.
??? Your comment is an actual ad hominem, do you not know what the words you use mean? An ad hominem is not just “when someone insults you” it is when someone dismisses the argument presented based on the perceived value of the character of the person making the argument - As you did when you failed to engage with the actual argument given and instead talked about some psychotic “bots and tankies”. You have to actually present an argument in order to for me to hit you with an ad hominem, which you’ve failed to do, which is what I pointed out.
Now you then also go on and move the goalposts. You and I have not discussed whatever it is you’re trying to discuss, in fact we’re discussing your failure to engage with someone who did discuss that with you. So why would I want to? You’ve so far shown you’re completely incapable.
'Awww look at me, I’m so full of decorum! Why won’t you debate with me: a not bad faith actor!"
Why am I seeing this idiotic tactic lately from obvious wumaos? It’s obviously not a coincidence. How about telling Xi not to inflict ad hominem to Uyghurs.
Yeah man, I’m all decorum, that’s why I’m pointing out what a dipshit you are. I’m not even trying to debate you, you idiot. I’m trying to get you to stop being the laziest variant of a redditor possible.
Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is A Filthy Foreigner
I don’t know him, but if I did I would if he were doing that, but he isn’t, so I wouldn’t, if I knew him. How about reading the actual report? How about looking into anything beyond what you pick up through cultural osmosis in your racist echochamber?
Oh right, of course you you don’t know Xi. You are a small fish getting small crumbs.
(Dude this thread is 3 days old)
And people are still commenting