The problem is your pea sized reactionary brain is looking for a target to unload its anger on and, for real … maybe try checking your self righteous indignation and look in a mirror?
Kinda ignoring the whole sex crimes part of that comment but whatever. Again, got out of sex crimes charges, friends with Epstein. That doesn’t mean… Anything to you?
guilt by being very close friends with a known sex criminal who gives you advice on lawyers to help with the sex crime charges you are facing is a little bit beyond simple association.
Do you seriously not see the problem of his taking advice on who to retain for his impending sex crime case from a man who had been a convicted pedo for over a decade? I’ll grant you Epstein could have been making shit up in his email but I don’t need to nor will I give Rub and Tug Bob Kraft the benefit of the doubt.
yes its almost as if Hollywood and gaming industry exist on a gradient between black and white and should not be judged solely based on one single action.
A lot of people are in the Epstein files. John Stewart did a whole segment on this.
The problem is your pea sized reactionary brain is looking for a target to unload its anger on and, for real … maybe try checking your self righteous indignation and look in a mirror?
he was friends with Epstine to the point he hired a lawyer to get out of sex crime charges on Epstine’s advice to him.
i mean thats what lawyers do, they help you escape charges.
you would literally do the same if you got charged.
Kinda ignoring the whole sex crimes part of that comment but whatever. Again, got out of sex crimes charges, friends with Epstein. That doesn’t mean… Anything to you?
He had the same lawyer as Epstein after Epstein suggested him to Kraft, my guy. Maybe do a modicum of research before diving into a dismissive tirade
yes, guilt by association is not evidence of a crime.
fuck your mob mentality and fuck you because you would want the same defense I am giving Mr Kraft.
guilt by being very close friends with a known sex criminal who gives you advice on lawyers to help with the sex crime charges you are facing is a little bit beyond simple association.
guilt by associate is not actual guilt you lackwit.
you’re so bad at this I’m not sure if you’re agreeing with me or not…
Lol who’s the angry one again?
i was fine before you opened your mouth. anger can be a gift if wielded appropriately. you deserve it.
anger is not my default emotion, so i dont lead with it on the internet with strangers.
i am allowed to utilized it like sadness or happiness or any other emotion. thanks for noticing
Do you seriously not see the problem of his taking advice on who to retain for his impending sex crime case from a man who had been a convicted pedo for over a decade? I’ll grant you Epstein could have been making shit up in his email but I don’t need to nor will I give Rub and Tug Bob Kraft the benefit of the doubt.
i mean the man is walking around free so the advice was prudent?
association with crime is not itself a crime.
you are reaching FR.
What are you talking about their reaching? You are so clearly defending 2 pedophiles, why?
where anger?
sigh
Criticizing you for being super specific in one sentence, then super obtuse in a second sentence is not me being angry.
And to me froggy is fun, like frisky.
Words on the internet can sometimes have an unintended tone, thanks for the critic.
this is fair.