• atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      GM has been banned from selling user data to insurance companies in the US and Tesla has been in the news multiple times for sharing video from inside people’s cars.

      This should be a forgone conclusion especially with Europe mandating cameras in cars now.

  • aizakku@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    “On the one hand this offers practical benefits, but on the other hand these systems collect a great deal of data about occupants, the vehicle itself, and about objects and people in the vicinity. Various parties, including state actors, can gain access to this data,” it added.

    Practical benefit? Idk, I like driving so the nanny systems are bogus. I’ll keep my ‘08 G37S till it doesn’t make sense and then move to maybe 2010 GTI because it’s honestly a more fun car. The touchscreen sucks in the 2010, but still very few nanny systems in this vintage of car.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      i’ve discovered by accident that if you’re lucky enough to have the right kind of engine and mechanics, then an older car makes more financial sense as well.

      the average monthly payment for a car is around $800, and if you have the right kind of engine – one where transmissions and head units are the most costly repairs, like nearly all did before the early 2010’s – then the worst case scenario is $3000, which is less than 4 months of payments.

      but the caveat is that you have to know the right mechanics, since specialty shops like aamco dramatically inflate their prices. they wanted $7500 to replace the transmission on my 2008 and i found mechanics willing to do it for $1800 back in 2023.

      and there are plenty of these mechanics around – i’ve used four of them on 3 different cars since 2003. the trick is knowing who they are, since they’re usually operating out of small mom & pop shops that keep bankers hours, so they’re MUCH more inconvenient and harder to find than something like aamco.

      • aizakku@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yea my guy is good, I take it there when I need work done on a lift. There was power issues a few weeks back so me and a buddy replaced the spark plugs(230km and prob factory plugs 😬) but no dice. So I took it to my mechanic to diagnose properly since there were no codes. Turned out it needed both catalytic converters as they were pretty clogged. He got me sorted quickly, but we got the parts from US and with the nonsense down there it was stuck at customs for like 4 days.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          … we got the parts from US and with the nonsense down there it was stuck at customs for like 4 days.

          one of the few good reasons to buy an american car if you’re in the united states. lol

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is well documented, that your car is one of the biggest sources of data to data farmers. Before we knew how bad LG and basically everything else is.

      We used to have a word for it:

      Spyware

  • irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem has very little to do with Chinese Imports. The car companies all over the world are already collecting a ton of data. For example, there have already been many reports of how auto insurance companies in the US buy that data from multiple companies and use it to raise premiums for people who drive recklessly, among many other uses. Also, just having an always on transmitter in a car now makes it easy for companies like Flock to track your vehicle and that is explicitly for law enforcement, and their systems have already been proven to be easily hackable. If you think governments and malicious actors don’t also buy and/or steal that information, you aren’t paying attention.

  • ᴋɪᴋɪ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That was already pretty obvious. You’d have to be stupid to think technology doesn’t spy on people. Even the fact that our phones are always watching us makes us think about these new things with AI. That’s the world we live in: a mess. They’re always watching us. All of this makes the world hypocritical and capitalist. :/