return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoPeople are asking ChatGPT to help them decide how to vote in the midtermswww.npr.orgexternal-linkmessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down10cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1174arrow-down1external-linkPeople are asking ChatGPT to help them decide how to vote in the midtermswww.npr.orgreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square38linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squaregrapefruittrouble@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoIs this not what it was designed for?
minus-squareZomg@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoWhen the companies can adjust the weights and responses to be more soft or critical to topics, you can’t exactly trust that it isn’t unbias some how.
minus-squareTubularTittyFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 days agoyou can click through to the source material when it’s linked. but nobody is doing that, and when I admit to doing it people tell me I’m deranged.
minus-squareWhoIzDisIz@lemmy.todayBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 days agoNot with the monied interests in charge of its operation. They want people to depend upon the big AIs for answers to everything so they can subtly guide the populace’s “thinking” and control them like the sheep most of them are.
minus-squareLeon@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoYes, that’s what the comment was saying.
minus-squareWhoIzDisIz@lemmy.todayBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoCould be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague.
minus-squaregrapefruittrouble@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoI did mean it that way haha
Is this not what it was designed for?
When the companies can adjust the weights and responses to be more soft or critical to topics, you can’t exactly trust that it isn’t unbias some how.
you can click through to the source material when it’s linked.
but nobody is doing that, and when I admit to doing it people tell me I’m deranged.
Not with the monied interests in charge of its operation. They want people to depend upon the big AIs for answers to everything so they can subtly guide the populace’s “thinking” and control them like the sheep most of them are.
Yes, that’s what the comment was saying.
Could be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague.
I did mean it that way haha
deleted by creator