• Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    Doesn’t look like a decomp, but a vibecoded clone. A decomp would get sued into oblivion anyway.

    I highly doubt this will ever replace the originals, but Adobe would deserve that.

  • pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    30 days ago

    I cannot comment on this specific case because I have not looked at the source code or products, but there’s a bigger story here that most people are missing. In the last week, LLMs have been used to decompile multiple video games into human-readable source code that can be easily modified by humans or LLMs. These have resulted in projects mixing elements from Mario, Elden Ring, Minecraft, etc. LLMs are now able to decompile software into usable source (and check if said source compiles to match the original, on a loop).

    I am struggling to wrap my mind around the consequences of this development. It basically means that all commercial, closed-source software can now be pirated and modified at will, assuming you have the money to pay for LLM tokens for the decompilation process.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      30 days ago

      It means more software is about to go cloud-only. Decompiling Photoshop wouldn’t have any value if all the actual work is done via cloud GPUs and raw bitmap layers are returned instead. Double bonus for the shareholders you get software as a service and you also get to rent compute by the dollar on top.

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        30 days ago

        That’s pretty scary. Hardware is already scarce because of datacenters. If companies like Adobe increase their need for hardware, it will prevent users from building powerful machines. They’ll be forced to use lighter machines and access those cloud compute services, and things will balloon from there.

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      I think what will be exceedingly interesting is decompiled drivers for proprietary and out of support hardware for FOSS. Then there’s ROMS from a host of device types…

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      Look GIMP is great as an alternative. Happy it exists. It is cumbersome and difficult, it has a steep learning curve and I just gave up and pirated PS

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        30 days ago

        I want to like gimp, but it really borders on unusable unless you really commit to it.

        For filthy casual users like me, there is little value in persisting with it. Either use something simple for quick edits, or give to an llm for more complex tasks.

    • Sina@beehaw.orgBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gimp is useful software for certain cases, but it’s not really a Photoshop competitor or alternative. Maybe it could be if someone added the missing features, but I don’t see that happen anytime soon.

    • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Gimp can’t attach the new stuff Photoshop AI-powered stuff can. It’s a difficult to use clone of Photoshop as it was about 8 years ago.

  • anarcat@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    29 days ago

    For anyone that’s interested, it is vibe-coded slop. I installed their photoshop clone, pasted in a picture, tried curves, and the text tool. Curves would only show up in the side panel, and it didn’t feel like it was making the colors do what they should. Trying to select text after you’ve typed it makes it disappear. Trying to change the font relied on a dropdown that (unlike PS), doesn’t show you what each typeface looks like, and you can’t scroll through the dropdown, you just have to manually choose one font at a time.

    This ain’t it. You’re better off with Krita, Gimp, or even Photopea.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    and released it as OSS

    NO THEY FUCKING HAVEN’T! ALL THEY’VE DONE IS PIRATE IT WITH EXTRA STEPS!

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I downloaded the Illustrator clone, ran it and it looked correct. But I didn’t try using it beyond looking at the menus. I can’t imagine Adobe won’t try to do something about this.

  • bashibazouk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Looks like all the in program AI gen is done in the cloud and the monthly pricing is about credits to that. There is also a web version. Does the suite work disconnected from the internet with or without the AI gen? As someone in print design and production I don’t see the magic word I always look for in these alternate tools: Pantone…