Pretty sure that’s a load-reduction measure due to AI scraping. Git history produces a ton of links which scrapers traverse through and generate load. I’m pretty sure just cloning the repo with git over https works fine.

Well since the Pi is already there and has a serial interface, getting an ESP32 is still more expensive :)

As mentioned by CondorWonder, the LG via Serial HA Integration can already connect to a TCP socket instead of a TTY device.

If you want to use your Raspberry Pi as the serial proxy server, there’s tons of options. To recommend something kinda modern, I’d put a systemd service on your raspberry pi which starts netcat on a stty, see https://stackoverflow.com/a/71173551/2232127 as an example.

DHCP usually provides three things:

• IP Address (+ subnet mask)
• Defaulft gateway IP
• DNS servers

In the DHCP lease you for example get the IP 192.168.10.42/24. That IP is assigned to your interface which creates a implizit route like 192.168.10.0/24 dev netinterface. Now you know how to reach other hosts in your local network.

In the same DHCP lease, you should also receive a default gateway - likely 192.168.10.1. this would add a route like default via 192.168.10.1.

Without the default route, packets for IPs other than your local network never leave your host because it doesn’t know where to send them to.

DNS servers are also provided, though before troubleshooting that, I would just ping addresses like 8.8.8.8 (google dns) for testing connectivity.

(Btw, what I’m trying to say is: DHCP is working, but your server configuration may not be correct for what you’re trying to do)

You could also skip troubleshooting DHCP by running ip route add default via 192.168.10.1 to test if your firewall is configured correctly. That should enable you to ping other networks.

If that’s the only route then your issue starts there. If you want to reach anything other than the local network there needs to be a default route to the gateway.

The default route is sent along the dhcp lease so my suspicion is that the issue is in the dhcp server config.

Just for context, this technology is not made for any specific end-consumer. This is for backbone connections of ISP and higher tier networks.

In that space, 400Gb/s is the current stuff that’s being rolled out with 800Gb/s starting to get traction. 1.2Tb is just the next step to reduce the amount of Fibers and Ports used per connection (renting fibers of an undersea cable is expensive).

Though one issue I see slowing adoption is that new fibers are needed. With coherent optics we already achieve 800G with the same single mode fibers already in use.

Which fiber provider doesn’t support IPv6? I thought it was only Swisscom mobile and its subsidiary’s which don’t support it (though from what I heard, even that is in testing now)

That’s not necessarily very easy. These certs would have to show up in public certificate transparancy logs for most browsers to accept them. If this happens on a government scale it would surely get noticed, though the question remains what you’re left to do if the government forces it anyways…

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_Transparency section “Mandatory certificate transparency”

If by RJ45 you mean erhernet over standard 8P8C (i.e. RJ45) your looking for SFP-T modules. Can’t connect that to your DSL line though since that’s not Ethernet.

There do seem to exist G.fast sfp modules for dsl, but do note that sadly sfp module and router brand incompatibility is sadly a thing.

Related note: At our company we also had quite some issues getting some of these more special sfp modules working (e.g. XGS-PON), so ymmv with a dsl one.

(If you’re looking for a device to plug sfp modules into, I can second MikroTik here. They’re also great about accepting 3rd party SFPs)

If your dsl is G.Fast you could try the Zyxel GM4100. That device is only a bridge

Pretty sure he’s confusing it with either SFP+ or SFP28.

OSFP is the current bleeding edge with 400Gb/s of bandwidth. The current primary use case for that is ISP networks or running datacenter scale computing. The going prices for a PCIE card seems to be about 2k and around 600 for a DAC-Cable alone… compared to this 200$ mini PC, OSPF is in a completely different customer segment.

I’ve looked that up before. I think you have to hold Alt while grabbing the edge of the selection.

What do you mean by expensive? It’s free open source software no?

That doesn’t match my experience with AUR at all. Usually it pulls a specific git revision and checks the hash. This also ensures that the build shouldn’t suddenly fail to some extent.

Though it’s entirely possible that it’s not like this for all packages, though I find it kind of counterintuitive since your package manager wouldn’t know when to perform an update in this case.

A diagram of the relevant Hypervisor/VMs/containers + Network information would be helpful.

From where and how are you testing DNS? Did you use dig and specified the nameserver directly?

They defined it as above 1.6 tons (metric) for ICE/hybrid and 2 tons for EVs