• 1 Post
  • 386 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 29th, 2023

help-circle

  • New book: superlawyers! how claude makes you the best lawyer in the room.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GHYS5FC2

    The author even shares his prompts for free!

    https://github.com/danlorry/superlawyers-prompts

    Every prompt here is designed for that pattern: Claude multiplies your judgment, never replaces it. The prompts are ready to paste into Claude. The book explains why they are structured the way they are.

    The prompts mostly seem to be structured as “imagine you are an attorney. Now do this homework exercise”. There’s a passingly interesting idea around having the chatbot attempt to form a counter argument to your own claims, which you can then use to make your own position stronger, which seems like it might actually be a genuinely okay idea especially if you expect your opponents to be llm sock puppets, but everything else looks pretty much like garden variety “do my thinking for me”.

    I’ll admit I didn’t read the prompts closely, so may be I’m being uncharitable, but I doubt there are many nuggets of gold hidden in there.

    h/t to rahaeli


  • I went to taiwan quite a while ago now. Everyone always says how friendly the locals are in the places they visit (except paris, obviously) but on several different occasions in different parts of the island the response to us trying and failing to ask questions or buy stuff was one of the staff or customers leaning out of a window and shouting a bit, and then someone else coming in off the street to translate for us.

    The food was great, which shouldn’t come as a surprise, but one thing I particularly liked were these fast food stands where you grabbed a small basket and picked some ingredients, which tended to be fairly common to all the stands, but then you’d hand the basket over and some process would be applied to the things you picked and each time the effect was different. Sometimes it was a soup, sometimes a stir fry, sometimes it would be astonishingly spicy. I’m guessing now with readily available translation software on everyone’s smartphones some of the surprise would be taken away.

    We saw far less than I’d have liked, and I should go back again before tensions with china ratchet up too high.




  • Nah, that’s just the global-warming-induced warm water they like, the presence of a reactor was incidental… swarms around any sort of suction system are going to be a problem.

    I can offer you a upgrade in the form of an array of radioactive spinning blades if you’d like.

    (in theory you could deploy your data centres in places where nutrient levels are low, so there’s less plankton and so a much reduced risk of jellyfish swarms, but I have absolutely no faith that these cowboys would even stop to think about that for one moment)








  • I was gonna link someone else’s observations on it, but got sidetracked by a shiny object or something.

    https://mastodon.catgirl.cloud/@49016/117021988214007605

    They didn’t link the sources, but apparently the all-my-apes-gone twitter crowd are still breathtakingly ignorant of technology and statistics, despite how many years of bitcoin catastrophes have passed.

    Quite a few people suggesting/using dice to mitigate the Coldcard vulnerability.

    Note that common dice are not designed to be cryptographically secure.

    If you are going to do this, you probably should buy precision casino dice. And even then, have another source of entropy.

    Posted entirely unironically, apparently. Hard to say, but Poe’s law has yet t be repealed.




  • Salt water is famously a forgiving environment to build in, and oceanic weather is benign and predictable. Not that it would be a problem anyway, because move-fast-and-break-things people can be trusted to do the right thing when it comes to running delicate equipment in places more hostile than mid california, and will not skimp on staffing and maintenance. You can look at all the the successful seasteading operations to see how well this will go.

    There are also no problems I can foresee with putting a bucketload of fissiles in international waters, with no scope for finally uniting old-school piracy with new-school piracy, either. This plan is great, and no-one will have a problem with it.



  • And a follow-up by talia ringer, who observes that there have always been gaps between the type-theoretic underpinnings of things like the lean prover and their actual implementation, and this hasn’t been so much of an issue til now because theorem provers haven’t had the attention of people in high places, and the type-theoreticians have been able to catch up in due course.

    https://mathstodon.xyz/@TaliaRinger/117005740997367321

    My big worry right now is that if organizations continue to fund the crap out of Al for formal proof research (and to generally support implementation and maintenance of proof assistants like Lean as part of that effort) but don’t bother funding the type theory side of things, those gaps will grow larger and will be exploited more often by Al tools via reward hacking. Whereas people tend to only exploit kernel bugs to make a point that the bug exists. Thus proof assistants will grow less trustworthy over time.

    Anyone want to place any bets on whether or nor the big llm companies are going to fund academic research that isn’t obviously mechanisable right now and won’t yield any clickbait headlines?


  • A little bit of plot thickening spotted by abadidea: https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/117002106099986943

    tl;dr, the timeline looks like this:

    • “proof” of collatz conjecture released
    • bugs identified in lean kernel
    • proof demonstrated to use these bugs

    There was only a day between the first two events, and the non-proof was not where the bugs were discovered. So maybe it was just a coincidence that the chatbot found the bug at the same time, or maybe it’s training data included previous investigations into those bugs which it then built upon and that would be a bad thing for other llm generated proofs.

    The collatz conjecture is sufficiently famous that enough third-party checking was done to spot the problem. I wonder how much checking would have been done on proofs of less famous and interesting things.


  • To be extra grumpy… seems to me that most note-taking apps have always been a bit shit, and coding assistants have just pushed them over the edge. All vast electron apps with terrible sandboxing as far as the eye can see.

    I quite like the linked-text-document model for various things, and it would be nice if someone could make an editor that a) didn’t use electron and b) could do something like html export. Oh, and c) supported plugins that don’t get unrestricted access to my entire filesystem.

    Not even any closed-source options manage that, though. Everything is just bloat and security vulnerabilities as far as the eye can see.