For the most part, probably.

“In Quebec, we made the decision that state and the religion are separate,” said Education Minister Bernard Drainville

What is religion anyway? Worshiping men (politicians) is okay, but worshiping Allah is not?

As someone else pointed out, even from a liberal pov, this is wrong as it is anti-freedom and anti-personal autonomy. Women should have the right to choose what to wear according such a philosophy. Using the unconvincing loophole of “but they were forced to wear hijab” to turn this into something pro-freedom/pro-autonomy hardly changes that fact.

It’s a dangerous path to take, as these politicians will not only step on Muslims’ rights, but also set a precedent that the government (a few elites) can dictate when people are wearing too much. It also undermines the entire notion of protecting women’s rights.

Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) should have been a red flag that Canada’s rulers are mildly deranged along with being morally bankrupt.

Found the philosophical anarchist. 🙂

They were always the bad guys

https://imeu.org/article/the-nakba-and-palestine-refugees-imeu-questions-and-answers

The fatter the bat is, the bigger the soup will be!

Yes, because cameras are cheaper.

I made a mistake. It wasn’t a profile banner.

Ops. It’s not a profile banner, but a post.

I was talking about the image of women hurting men.

deleted by creator

Fork over your country’s minerals and we are maybe going to help you, maybe.

Click both, get a hybrid

It feels unrealistic. Remember EU’s DMA which targeted Apple’s app installation restrictions? That Act still has done nothing of value and Apple has so far given the EU a middle finger. Isn’t open sourcing Tesla a much bigger ask?

Laws must be enforceable, otherwise what’s the point…

With enough oversight, I can buy the safety part. Without rigid oversight, you may end up with self-igniting batteries. When it comes to security, America is a low bar.

There is also an ethical component to the critique of Chinese goods in general, which concerns the CCPs actions and policies. Let’s not ignore that.

My point was, China is not better than the US. I’m sure Canada can do better than that, if they cooperate with other countries.

Bad idea. China isn’t better than the US, and their EVs are a safety and security risk in and of themselves.

I can imagine Canada being in a position to collaborate with friendly countries to develop a safe, secure and open alternative to Tesla and “CCP-mobiles”. If that becomes a reality, everyone benefits.

deleted by creator

It’s very tragic that he took his own life. By staying alive, he had the potential to turn his life around and do a lot of good around him. This act should really be discouraged. He shouldn’t have ruined himself, and on top of that given the Zionist scum something to gloat over.

deleted by creator

That’s a stupid question. As a collective, humanity is able to accomplish all these things.

I have now read the article (which OP didn’t link to), and it does indeed seem like this narrative was unfounded and I was right. I could not find any support for eugenics in the article, and the interviewees even spoke against it explicitly.

You should read the article yourself, it’s actually quite insightful.

“If more people like us don’t have children, the world will stop seeing innovation and economic prosperity. It’s very important that the right people reproduce.”

I have now read the article, and what you just quoted is nowhere to be found. I would really like to know where you found the text you quoted.

In fact, neither the article nor the interviewees defended eugenics, at all. They even addressed the issue explicitly near the end of the text.

I’m not defending these people, or saying that they are saints, but there was no indication that they were supporting eugenics. To the contrary, they spoke against it.