Richard Ngo (rationalist circle-jerker and former employee of DeepMind and OpenAI) has finally identified the key problem that AI safety people won’t address: it won’t engage honestly with taboos.
More specifically, AI safety people are failing to acknowledge how much brown people suck. And if AI people can’t acknowledge controversial and obvious truths such as this, what’s going to happen with their LLMs?
Even Scoot, the bravest of the brave truth-tellers, is so fearful of being tarred a racist that he covers his actual beliefs about black people in jokes and irony.
From the replies:
The entirety of Lighthaven needs locker insertion
talking about “their ontology” like it’s a mtg deck. “i’m bringing in extra racism from the sideboard”
As in they need a locker stuffed into them? Agreed
✋ ontology
👉 intology
INTology
inceltology
Also I realize the word often get’s used fuzzilly that way even in general, but I suspect what they mean is epistemology not ontology.