• zbyte64
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maybe if you don’t choose it’s a vote for a lottery to pick. If half the population doesn’t vote then the winner is a random person. So if the authorities manage to prevent people from voting then they can’t seize the system with their own pick

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Random? I’d hope they were at least qualified. Believe me, I wouldn’t want most of the people I know in charge of anything. I wouldn’t even trust myself with a town budget.

      • zbyte64
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Right, but this is a democracy we are talking about. If half of the people participating are convinced the entire selection is no better than a random pick then that is very damning.

            • josephmbasile@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Experts do know best in their field of expertise, that’s what makes them experts. In such a “Citizen Jury” if we lucked out and got a PhD in microbiology I would probably want that person on the FDA committee or whatever.

              Excluding someone from the political process because they have an education is called Kakistocracy.

            • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              One of the first thing authoritarians do is eliminate or crush intellectuals. The Soviets murdered all of the Polish intellectuals. The Khmer Rouge did the same thing. Even wearing glasses made you “guilty”. They don’t want anyone who can talk back.