36 commits by ‘tridge and claude’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0EAo9jo-U4&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260603-rsync-goes-ai-slop-breaks-your-backups - podcast
time: 7 min 34 sec
36 commits by ‘tridge and claude’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0EAo9jo-U4&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260603-rsync-goes-ai-slop-breaks-your-backups - podcast
time: 7 min 34 sec
someone with a pretty website and a wife who knows statistics mounts an impassioned defence of tridge and the clankers:
https://alexispurslane.github.io/rsync-analysis/
a person whose last two years worth of github contributions are related to confabulation machinery, surely this is an unbiased analysis.
dividing by commits is some nasty sleight of hand given the commit rate has gone through the roof. “only 3 bugs per 10 commits!!” doesn’t really mean much when there’s an order of magnitude more slop commits than not
One of the most egregious examples of p-hacking I’ve ever seen.