• Steve
    link
    English
    395 months ago

    Is it absurd that the maker of a tech product controls it by writing it a list of plain language guidelines? or am I out of touch?

    • Kg. Madee Ⅱ.
      link
      fedilink
      305 months ago

      @fasterandworse @dgerard I mean, it is absurd. But it is how it works: an LLM is a black box from a programming perspective, and you cannot directly control what it will output.
      So you resort to pre-weighting certain keywords in the hope that it will nudge the system far enough in your desired direction.
      There is no separation between code (what the provider wants it to do) and data (user inputs to operate on) in this application 🥴

      • @corbin
        link
        English
        75 months ago

        That’s the standard response from last decade. However, we now have a theory of soft prompting: start with a textual prompt, embed it, and then optimize the embedding with a round of fine-tuning. It would be obvious if OpenAI were using this technique, because we would only recover similar texts instead of verbatim texts when leaking the prompt (unless at zero temperature, perhaps.) This is a good example of how OpenAI’s offerings are behind the state of the art.

    • @ebu
      link
      English
      20
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      simply ask the word generator machine to generate better words, smh

      this is actually the most laughable/annoying thing to me. it betrays such a comprehensive lack of understanding of what LLMs do and what “prompting” even is. you’re not giving instructions to an agent, you are feeding a list of words to prefix to the output of a word predictor

      in my personal experiments with offline models, using something like “below is a transcript of a chat log with XYZ” as a prompt instead of “You are XYZ” immediately gives much better results. not good results, but better

      • Steve
        link
        English
        145 months ago

        it’s all so anti-precision

      • @o7___o7
        link
        English
        10
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        simply ask the word generator machine to generate better words, smh

        Butterfly man: “Is this recursive self-improvement”

    • @barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      It is absurd. It’s just throwing words at it and hoping whatever area of the vector database it starts generating words from makes sense in response.

    • FRANK.MCCONNEL
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      @fasterandworse @dgerard I am pretty sure I have seen programming the computer in plain English used as a selling point for various products since the 1970s at least

      the best part is that most of these products are ex-products

      • FRANK.MCCONNEL
        link
        fedilink
        75 months ago

        @fasterandworse @dgerard I mean, it’s like catnip for the people who control how the company’s money is spent

        For absurd, I think one would want the LLM’s configuration language to be more like INTERCAL; but this may also be more explicit about how your instructions are merely suggestions to a black box full of weights and pulleys and with some randomness added to make it less predictable/repetitive

    • @V0ldek
      link
      English
      35 months ago

      “controls” is way too generous