The Trump administration has not fully complied with a court order pausing the freezing of foreign assistance grants and contracts, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Amir Ali last week ordered the administration to allow the disbursement of U.S. foreign assistance after hearing claims from federal contractors challenging an executive order signed by President Donald Trump pausing nearly all foreign assistance.

  • @just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    129
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Bring specific people into court, and hold them in contempt.

    If they refuse to appear, assume judgement, and seize assets.

    You don’t need a fucking army if you can force all their assets to be frozen. Worked for Russia, worked in the Red Scare, and it’ll work now.

      • Remember, he is only immune for official acts. And the courts reserved the right to determine if an act is official. I think they could easily say that openly defying the courts ruling is not an official act. They will wait for something bigger I suspect, but the supreme court judges love power just as much as trump. They are probably excited by the prospect of expanding thier power by giving trump the boot.

    • @ryrybang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      151 month ago

      Contempt needs to happen, like tomorrow. The longer these folks feel above any law the worse our chances of recovery from this get.

    • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 month ago

      If this were civil, that would maybe be a thing.

      This is… well its fundamentally different. We’ve undergone a coup. This kind of circle-jerking “But He’s Not Following The Law” by NBC, is well, masturbatory, and intentionally obscures what has happened.

      NBC is part of the problem, not the solution. Being in contempt of courts when courts and law have no… why pretend like they do?

      • Not about civility. Doomers are saying there isn’t anything the other equal branches of government can do, but there is. This is one of those things.

          • I do. This is not a civil matter. This is 1/3 of the government apparatus fucking with the other two, and the judicial has all the power in this country to compel every citizen to comply.

            Is Chase holding Elon’s money? Guess what happens if they don’t comply with a federal court order.

            What state does he hold property in?

            Does he have stocks? Of course he does. All of these can be seized on paper alone without the Executive branch being involved at all.

            • I’m even more convinced than before you have not a fucking clue what the fuck you are talking about or what civil means in this context.

            • @Dragomus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              On paper the judicial branch can uphold checks and balances … and should … but if no one executes it things are moot…

              On paper Trump IS an insurrectionist and should never have been allowed to delay his criminal cases and should be locked up now for treason… but here we are, no one dared to properly stop him.

              The courts can deny the legality of Trump’s orders all they want, if they don’t bring a force to reel him or others in things will proceed according to King Trump’s will… Besides, Trump decreed only he and and an AG can declare what is law now, so …yeah…

              Look at one of the institutions (forgot which it was) that Musk planted himself in … a police/security force was keeping legally appointed people out of the building while said police should have forced Musk out for illegally interfering with government offices.

              It will never matter if they eventually do arrest a “Peter from accounting” who gave Musk passwords to some computer somewhere but let Trump and Musk themselves do whatever they want.

              On paper, by repeatedly trashing the constitution Trump should already have been stopped in 2025 alone, but everyone seems intent on just riding it out and is already afraid to personally get in Trump’s crosshairs.

              On paper the military is bound by oath to protect the constitution, but Trump quickly replaces anyone there who as much as frowns at his executive orders…

    • @Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Dude, you no longer have a functioning legal system

      You are calling for antibiotics for a patient with no inmune system… trying to jump start a car with a siezed engine

      If anything could work (and I’m not sure it would at this point) is a general, nation wide strike

        • @hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          Correct me if I’m stupid, I thought asset seizures need to go through the Department of Treasury, no? Like they can refuse to honor the FDIC, other things if banks don’t unfreeze?

          This also all seems to go through the whole “if they comply”. Usually the DOJ enforces things, no?

          • @just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Nope. They can apply at any banking institutions which are governed by state as well. Is that bank incorporated in any of the 23 states currently suing the Trump admin?

            Is Danny Smith the head of said bank?

            Any and all of the individuals involved in not complying with a court order can be held in contempt and have assets frozen for defying a lawful order of the court.

              • @stickly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                11 month ago

                On the other hand, Trump is already flaunting his ability to choke state resistance by withholding federal funding.

                Outrageously unconstitutional but he already isn’t following the courts anyway. I wonder if there’s any way for states to work around that, since most blue states are net negative on federal funds.

                Just stop paying up because he won’t comply with the freeze? Then use those funds to paper over the deficit?

                • @grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Just stop paying up because he won’t comply with the freeze?

                  In order to “just stop paying up” the states would have to convince their citizens and businesses to stop paying their Federal income taxes and payroll taxes, because that money goes directly to the Federal government without passing through the states’ control first.

                  As far as I can tell, the only part of the Federal budget revenue that flows through the states and therefore might be able to be blocked is small enough to fit in the “misc/other” slice on a pie chart.

                  • @stickly@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 month ago

                    Good point. But at the same time the states control a lot of bureaucracy around day-to-day civilian operations and vital records.

                    If the state doesn’t send birth and death certificates to the IRS, taxing gets a lot harder. They control the registration of corporate entities, and while I’m not an expert on corporate law, I assume they could cause problems restricting access to those.

                    There’s probably some creative, outside the box economic resistance as well that I don’t know enough to guess at. For example, taxes/tolls/fines targeting government vehicles? Cutting or up-charging state power/utilities to customs offices?