• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      hace 24 días

      If I don’t find an anti-AI kernel fork I might be moving to NetBSD soon. That sucks, I hate moving to a new OS.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        hace 24 días

        Linus has always prioritized results over ideological purity. Which is why Linux runs the world whereas BSD is still just a niche project.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          hace 24 días

          Clearly he doesn’t care about results because he slop coded with antigravity rather than reading documentation for a python side-project. I imagine his younger self would be cussing his older self out for shipping things he literally doesn’t understand.

          The reason for his actions are much simpler: he got paid. He gets paid from the linux foundation which receives a lump sum from AI companies. In 2024 Linus said AI was just Hype, but then the foundation received millions in funds from the AI companies.

          If he cared about results he would have written the damn things himself.

          • Ahmed?@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            hace 23 días

            I’m no vibecoder but between 2024 and now, LLMs also got much better. It might not have been the money that changed his mind.

                • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  hace 23 días

                  You’re going to argue that some new never before seen trove of uncontaminated training data was discovered? Perhaps you think the AI Scaling Laws don’t exist? Businesses that adopted AI dropped it or went out of business not long after, it’s as useless today as it was in the 1980s.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          hace 24 días

          I’m not totally convinced that his behavior in the past is a reflection on what is to come. He is at this point still refusing to answer questions about licensing LLM generated code and such and has apparently been obfuscating LLM commits. That doesn’t sound like somebody who is committed to results so much as it sounds like somebody giving into AI brainrot.

          • klankin@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            hace 24 días

            He’s also human, for example he hypothetically could use AI to offset a disability like dementia - a totally reasonable emotional response, but also not who I want controlling global cyber security.

            Last I heard though all AI commits were a separate branch, I wasn’t aware of any sneakiness.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          hace 24 días

          I’m not sure I’d call permissive licensing “ideological purity” compared to copyleft.

          Frankly, I think BSD loses because corporations are legally allowed to take and never give back.

        • klankin@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          hace 24 días

          That and BSD was almost BSD™ by AT&T™.

          Lost all its momentum at probably its most valuable growth opportunity to a single dev.

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            hace 24 días

            A lot of people very recently are already jumping ship from Linux so it appears a new most valuable growth opportunity has arrived.

  • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    hace 24 días

    I remember during the last big win11 update i defined active hours which was recommended by Microsoft to do so it only updates outside of work hours.

    Only for it to get reset without notification so all workstations started updating in the middle of work when left idle

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    hace 24 días

    Simple rules of thumb:

    Never use windows for presentations.

    Never use powerpoint for presentations.

    Never use your own profile for presentations.

    Always have a synced version to a URL that you can refer the audience to if the projector fails or doesnt like your computer.

    But yeah, that sucks.

    • Sergio@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      hace 24 días

      A friend who did a lot of presentations said: always have backups for everything.

      • spare laptop
      • duplicates of all kinds of connectors & cables
      • projector and external speakers (if all in-person audience)
      • know of any other available rooms nearby
      • copies of presentation on USB and online
      • etc.

      I went on a business trip with him once, and we all carried 2 bags each of equipment. Last I heard, he ended up working for a large entertainment company in LA.

  • one_old_coder@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    hace 24 días

    I haven’t used Windows in years, but it’s kind of funny to remember because my Linux machines take at most 5 minutes to update (even with a hundred packages to update), and only require a restart if something important happens, and even in that case I can postpone the reboot.

    Good luck anyway!

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      hace 24 días

      Windows machines frequently do updates without a reboot nowadays and you can usually postpone an update to a more convenient time.

      The problem is that when an update that requires a restart is waiting, it changes the standard restart button into one that does an update and restart. You can often fall into muscle memory and accidentally trigger an update.

      When combined with the fact that you quite often get problems that go away with a reboot you can easily get yourself into OP’s position where they’re waiting for an update to finish at a really inconvenient time.

    • BillyClark@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      hace 24 días

      Nowadays, a lot of Linux distributions like Ubuntu, for example, will do an update and then tell you that you should reboot, even if a reboot isn’t strictly necessary. You can still ignore and postpone, but I think most users will see this as very similar to Windows.

      • softotteep@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        hace 24 días

        Except for the fact that you can still use your computer while it’s updating. And it only takes one reboot (which takes the same amount of time as any other reboot) to apply the updates. And you have to actually tell your computer that you want to reboot. It’s really not like windows at all.

    • klankin@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      hace 24 días

      Not even doing an A/B partition kexec update scheme with VM live migration for all critical services??

      Oh wait I’m a stereotype

    • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      hace 24 días

      remember because my Linux machines take at most 5 minutes to update

      I keep kicking myself because I’m using fedora Kinoite on my slowest machine. It’s going to get arch eventually, but for now it’s just annoying whenever I go to use it for a few minutes until it finishes the update.

  • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    hace 23 días

    Seriously, this right here is why I stopped using windows for work and switched to linux for professional reasons. Windows is not serious business software because of shit like this.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      hace 23 días

      Hell, this is why I went out of my way to make sure I could control updates for my personal machine where the only consequences of it doing a random update would be that I can’t use it until it’s done. I didn’t even ever have it actually do an annoying update because the frustration was obvious as soon as I heard the term “automatic updates”, like this isn’t just for some program, it’s for the OS itself and will demand restarts.

      And that isn’t even mentioning the undesirable updates, like the buggy ones or the ones that just enshitify your OS rather than add anything anyone wants, like all those windows 7 “get ready for windows 10” ones and apparently some people even got an automatic “7 to 10” update.

      And then on Linux, every part of updating is nicer, other than the supply chain attacks (which is unfortunately serious enough I could see it threatening the entire Linux ecosystem itself).

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      hace 22 días

      Nice that you work at a place that allows that. Self employed?

  • saltnotsugar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    hace 24 días

    IT guy here. When you finally can respond or join the meeting, make sure you cover yourself in feathers from a pillow and blame a duck gang for your misfortune.

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      hace 23 días

      And then spend an hour trying to get the presentation to run the way you made it. I love Linux, but installing Linux here in this time sensitive situation is definitely not the move for someone who has Windows already installed and their presentation completed and saved, presumably because they don’t know enough about Linux to confidently switch over completely. Some will probably be able to get out of that situation unscathed, but not most.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        hace 23 días

        I don’t think they were genuinely expecting the person to install Linux instead of waiting for an update to finish

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        hace 23 días

        And yet, they would still be more likely to pull off the presentation in Linux if it’s literally not possible in Windows 😉

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    hace 24 días

    I know there are large organisations where the laptops are configured to also update their firmware when users are trying to get out the door at the end of the day and the outsourced ICT teams couldn’t care less.

    Microsoft continues to be the best advocate for migrating to Linux.

  • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    hace 24 días

    If you’re forced to use Windows, you can minimise the amount of disruption from updates by remembering:

    • they’re only released on Tuesdays, so you can make sure you get several days without interruption by installing them on Wednesdays
    • there’s a pause updates for seven days button in Settings that you can use if there’s a Tuesday between now and when you’re going to definitely need the computer to be available

    It’s much easier to plan around them when you know when they’re coming.

    • zoloftt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      hace 24 días

      I don’t know if OP says this anywhere, but if it’s a company laptop then MAYBE updates are whenever IT feels like it… And you cannot pause updates unless IT feels like offering that to you… AND only for particular updates…

      I know you’re not trying to be mean IT but sometimes you hurt me

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      hace 24 días

      Managed corporate computers give IT departments control over when updates are released to users and installed. They’re usually later than the MS schedule to give more time for testing. Good departments will follow some sort of regular predictable schedule, but bad ones can just drop updates randomly.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      hace 24 días

      Not only this, but Windows as a whole doesn’t force you to restart until you hit the 7-day mark after the update was installed(unless you have the idle reboot setting on). So you have a whole seven days after installing your update to restart on your own time. That way it isn’t restarting in the middle of your presentation.

    • meejle@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      hace 24 días

      Windows 11 26H2 is actually a bit better with this anyway… it hangs on to updates that need reboots (instead of installing them straight away), so you only have to do an update-reboot once a month.

      I think you can pause updates for longer as well. It might even be indefinitely but I’ve never bothered to look into it.