• JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      13 days ago

      It doesn’t, this is based on one specific person’s (OOP) gender. It’s more about how having a bajillion dollars makes gender dysphoria into an incredibly easy problem to solve.

      • Cris_Citrus (he/him <3)@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        They might be saying: what if the button changes your external sex characteristics AND your internal relationship with gender

        Which seems entirely not a problem

    • neatchee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think the spirit of the question is “what if it was a trickster genie and you didn’t get what you thought and were unhappy?” Like, rather than the question as phrased, I imagine the intent was “what if the 1% chance was permanent gender dysphoria regardless of any practical steps taken to alleviate it?”

    • arudesalad@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Thess 99%/1% questions usually have the 1% be something bad and the bad in this case would have to be dysphoria

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    You can change society in ways such that people understand transitioning to be a normal/casual thing now with that amount of money.