If foxes were real no one would be able to stop me.
source under this post:
NSFW, furry, bare chest
More serious warning: furry
Apologies, I assumed that was implied by the e621 in the title. I forgot not everyone instantly knows what that is.
Everyone knows that E621 is the flavour enhancer MSG.
Yeah. I am one of those people that dont know what e621 is.
Furry pedo shit
e: itt: shameless pedos
Sir, that is the former governor of California
This character has bigger tits than my girlfriend, and my girlfriend is 41.
Fake : has girlfriend
Gay : imagines her with small tits.
Imagining tits is gay now?
Well, pack it up, boys. I think we’re done here. Yep. We’ve reached peak internet. Now we can stop and go outside instead.
Is your girlfriend single?
she’s from canada, you wouldn’t know her
💀 i’m hoping this is coming from a well intentioned place, but there are better signs than just breast size you should look at when deciding if art is pedo bait or not. it’s good to look for other secondary sexual characteristics (e.g. her hips), but one of the most reliabile is going to be the proportion of the eyes to the face, and the proportion of the head to the body. neither of those indicate a child in this drawing
i’m sure you can think of plenty of anime examples of characters with huge eyes and childlike bodies which are extremely obviously pedo bait 💀 we don’t need to go around tarring relatively normal art with that label
I am not sure what you’re talking about. The character portrayed in the drawing is Diane Foxington, canonically an adult.
Don’t you know? Every adult woman with small breasts is just pedobait! Even a 90 year old grandma with deflated tennis ball tits.
☝️ one of the top 5 responses when furry pedo “art” gets called out.
Can you provide proof that this is indeed furry pedo art?
Yeah, open the link and use at least one functional eye belonging to a living sighted person.
I opened the link and saw Diane, an adult woman with small breasts, where do you see the pedo stuff?
a hungry man always thinks of food huh?
“I know she looks like a baby, but actually she’s a 7000 year old goddess in the body of a newborn!”
How many children look like grown women to you? This is more of a self report than anything.
It was in response to the “canonically adult” comment (not the picture itself), because it’s a stupid defense that can be used to excuse anything, as per my example.
But I now see I actually responded to the wrong person.
Fair, that was a pretty weak comment.
The comment sections on e621 have definitely gotten less interesting since they implemented the rules about no real life shit or weird wanking wallowing.






