Smartglasses have always faced an uphill road to acceptance. Not only is propping a computer up on your nose an uncomfortable proposition, but the privacy aspect has been vexing people since the Google Glass days. Now, Google is ready to take another swing at “intelligent eyewear” for the Gemini era after previewing its plans a couple of times. The first glasses are up for preorder today from Gentle Monster and Warby Parker, but they’re no impulse buy.

These devices are a collaboration between Google, Samsung, and the aforementioned eyewear designers. Gentle Monster and Warby Parker have each designed a few different frames, with options for transparent and tinted lenses. Samsung is providing the computing hardware that fits inside them, and Google has the software covered.

Warby Parker has designed three frames for Google eyewear, called Alden, Reid, and Wren (see above). They are available with both standard optical and sun lenses in Pine, Saddle, and Jet Black colors at $395 and higher. Warby Parker is only selling devices in the US. Gentle Monster has gone a bit further with six styles, but Google hasn’t told us any names for those yet. They come in dark red, pink, gray, and yellow colors and are available with clear, tinted, blue, or brown lenses. The Gentle Monster styles start a little higher at $449, and they will be available in the US and South Korea.

Google says the frames all weigh about 41 grams, which is not terrible but is definitely near the top for glasses generally. They will, naturally, weigh much more when you account for lenses. That will also determine the final pricing. So far, we only have the starting prices for these devices, including non-prescription lenses.

The setup here is similar to the Ray-Ban Meta glasses we’ve seen for a few years. There are no screens in the lenses, but you can interact with the AI system via voice or by activating the integrated camera. The experience should be similar to using Gemini Live on your phone, but it will be a lot easier to fire up the AI. You can say “Hey Gemini” or tap a touch-sensitive area of the frame to start interacting with the robot.

Since this is the same chatbot that operates across the Google ecosystem, it has access to your data and preferences. You can ask questions and get personalized answers, have Google Maps guide you by voice, or just talk with the AI to kill time. The glasses use custom open-ear speakers to limit distractions for those around you. Google notes the directional microphones should not pick up speech from other people, either.

Adding the camera feed is where things get interesting. When the AI can see what you see, it has the potential to do more work on your behalf. Google suggests asking Gemini for recommendations when looking at a bookshelf or glancing at an event poster to have the AI add it to your calendar. The glasses will also support Gemini Guided Vision, which provides conversational audio descriptions for people who are visually impaired.

The utility of these devices hinges on Gemini. I would be remiss not to point out that Gemini, like all AI systems, is not infallible. In fact, it can be frustratingly fallible at times. The chatbot still regularly screws up simple things like adding calendar appointments or identifying objects in an image in my testing, and when you don’t have a screen to verify the AI’s output, it may be harder to trust it. These devices will really only make sense if you can rely on Gemini to do things right, and that’s still not a guarantee. Google’s privacy promises

All the Gemini-powered glasses from Gentle Monster and Warby Parker feature a 12 MP wide-angle camera capable of shooting photos and video. Google says it has implemented a number of features and limitations to ensure people don’t do creepy things with its intelligent eyewear, and that it doesn’t do creepy things to you—Google claims its approach respects privacy on “both sides of the lens.”

For starters, there’s a recording light that is on whenever the camera is active. Like the Meta glasses, Google’s eyewear will detect if the light has been covered up or modified in any way that would prevent it from illuminating. In that event, the glasses will refuse to activate the camera. All Google-powered glasses will have a physical off switch, too.

The terms of use for Gemini eyewear also require users to agree not to record people without consent or in sensitive areas. If Google finds out someone has broken those rules, it may remotely disable the glasses. Google is going a bit further in restricting video functionality than Meta, too. Google says it will not allow any apps in the Play Store to live stream video to social media from the glasses (not even YouTube live is supported). The content you record is saved to your gallery, and you can upload that wherever you want, but going live is apparently not on the agenda. Real-time facial recognition is also off the table, according to Google. The glasses also automatically redact faces before sending video to Google for processing.

On the user privacy side, Google says it will not save any images or videos captured by the glasses in your Gemini history. Additionally, none of that data will be used for training AI models or targeting ads. Your voice interactions with Gemini via the glasses are, as with all other Gemini endpoints, not guaranteed the same level of protection. You can delete your chats from the Gemini history, though.

Data on the glasses is encrypted, and it remains that way during transit to the cloud. However, it’s not encrypted on Google’s servers. The company does note that it’s working to bring Private AI Compute to glasses, which will isolate data during processing so not even Google can access it.

Anyone looking to get Gemini on their face and test Google’s privacy promise can preorder the glasses from the Gentle Monster and Warby Parker websites. Devices should ship and appear on store shelves on December 10. Importantly, support for these devices is a bit narrow at launch. They will work with all iPhones from the 13 Pro onward. On the Android side, you’ll need a Pixel 7 or newer or a Samsung Galaxy S or Z series device running One UI 9 or later. If you’ve got a cheaper Samsung Galaxy or a device from another OEM, you’re out of luck at the moment.

  • Mikelius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If Google finds out someone has broken those rules, it may remotely disable the glasses.

    “may” != “will”. Don’t need to be a lawyer to spot that.

    I’ll just have to eventually have a closet full of shirts that say “I do not consent to being recorded by pervert glasses”

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The terms of use for Gemini eyewear also require users to agree not to record people without consent or in sensitive areas. If Google finds out someone has broken those rules, it may remotely disable the glasses.

    Truly groundbreaking legal technology.

    • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I’m waiting for Google to get refreshingly direct, and simplify their terms of service to:

      “1. Fuck the law. and 2. You agree to take personal responsibility when the law eventually notices Google’s bullshit.”

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I mean, couldn’t you immediately notify Google that someone is walking down the street with their glasses on, recording everyone clearly without consent, and Google would have to pull access to the camera? This is farce.

        • crow@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          do you even have the right of not being recorded while outdoors? more precisely, one thing is holding a camera towards one person and one person only, following their every move, another is shooting a video while walking down the street, otherwise no one could ever even take a photo of a square as long as there’s someone, for example

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yes, you have an insanely broad right to film in public, but if you’re on a beach filming girls in bikinis, expect to get your shit broken and for everyone to look the other way.

            That’s what’s amazingly stupid aobut this ToS. Google is pretending it’s going to be more strict than the law requires, and anyone filming walking down a sidewalk is necessarily not getting consent from passers-by.

            So my questions would be: How do I report someoene to Google? Do they include a number? What are there standards of evidence? Are they really going to disable the glasses of everyone who starts recording in a public place? It just seems obvious they are just lying to us and pretending to care about privacy.

            I’d like to see some people willing to brick their glasses to volunteer to see exactly what it would take for Google to disconnect them.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        We get the laws. Google execs get paid trips to Israel, one of the pedo islands, free private planes, mega yachts, and bunkers, caviar, 500 year old wine, and poo coffee.

    • Kenny4tunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I wonder what their idea of remotely disable is…

      you’ve been busted recording people without consent, these glasses will self destruct now, good day

  • EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Google and privacy are like two separate universes. They are at odds with each other. What they call privacy is anything but what most people consider privacy.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Call em what they are: pervert glasses.

    How soon till we start seeing the news articles about women being stalked by perverts in these glasses, getting their personal info from these “smart” glasses, then murdering these innocent women??? You fucking know it’s going to happen.

  • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Google says it will not allow any apps in the Play Store to live stream video to social media from the glasses (not even YouTube live is supported). […] Real-time facial recognition is also off the table, according to Google.

    For now. Then, when this privacy theatre has led to a less-than-Google-glass-terrible adoption of Gen 1, it’ll come as a “big feature upgrade” with Gen 2.

    On the user privacy side, Google says it will not save any images or videos captured by the glasses in your Gemini history. Additionally, none of that data will be used for training AI models or targeting ads.

    Mind you, this is coming from the company which, along with many other such violations, has tracked people’s locations regardless of their “privacy” settings.

    Fuck this company. Fuck this product. And fuck anyone who buys this shit.

  • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    There are no screens in the lenses, but you can interact with the AI system via voice or by activating the integrated camera.

    So the reason to make them glasses is…?

    If I’m going to put a pair of smartglasses on, they better be doing all manner of cool XR Iron Man stuff for me, not be just a set of privacy invading cameras and an open mic fitted into a pair of frames.

    • deeprlyeh@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Real time heads up display would be great, but tech in the US would use it to deliver ads.

      “We feel we can occupy 80% of the user’s field of vision without inducing seizures.”

  • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Damn it I am going to need to get a tatoo on my forhead saying I am not a creap, I am just very vissually chalanged.