• Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      633 months ago

      The fact that the stupidity is intentional and the desired result is the rub. Stupid, uneducated people are less likely to think critically and more likely to accept and support whatever bullshit the political party behind all this shit Republicans spew out.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    563 months ago

    All part of the plan. The less educated the children are, the easier they can be exploited.

  • @Twinkletoes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    403 months ago

    Yeah. Keep them kids out of the library. They should be at home on the internet where they will only be exposed to wholesome content.

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      I don’t see how the law doesn’t require libraries to go 18+ to be free of liability.

      The language in this law is extremely broad. If anyone finds anything that they find objectionable in the children’s section, they can sue the librarians.

      There’s literally no way to protect yourself against this but to bar all children from the library, unless they have parental supervision. This ensures that the parent remains liable since they have become an obligated chaperone while inside the library.

      There’s no way to actually remove all the “offensive” content from the children’s section, because there’s no way to actually know what books that the extremists this law was created to enable will object to next.

      That it has the added effect of humiliating the Republicans who passed it by showing what it logically leads to, and angering parents who can no longer drop their kids off at the library, may be helpful in opposing this, but it looks like it’s just the predictable result of short-sighted reactionary lawmaking.

    • @redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      I’m sure the very people who put out these laws are going to be extremely bothered by libraries preventing kids from accessing cheap culture and education

      • @bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        True enough, but I think their aim is at citizens moreso than politicians. I would wager a lot of average folks probably weren’t even aware of the law being passed, stuff like this brings it more attention. Is it effective? No idea, I don’t live in Idaho. I wouldn’t be surprised it isn’t that effective, given how conservative most of Idaho is. But, I can respect libraries from at least trying to do something about it.

        • @redisdead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I don’t think the people who vote for this actually care. They’ve been told that every other book in them libruhries have them gay sex things, and that’s enough for them to cheer for it.

  • @El_guapazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    253 months ago

    I posted this on my FB feed. One lady argued that it was down to parental rights to control what their kids consumed. I said just stay out of the public library and public schools, but she said that was not a “good faith” argument.

    The irony is using “good faith” to impose their beliefs onto others was lost on her.

  • @LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 months ago

    Voting Blue is the way; Kicking those MAGA Fascists and their Church Bullies out of politics will help lessen their power. I never want to see a sign like this in my own public library! Attacking access to knowledge is a bold move, if it succeeds, I will be deeply saddened (it has a high chance in my area due to the brainwashed MAGA Fascists).

  • @GroundedGator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    223 months ago

    So the under 18 mother who was forced to carry a child can’t take that child to a library or even go herself.

    Yep, that tracks.

  • Beemo Dachboden
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    123 months ago

    Sometimes I think we should just go extinct and be done with this shit.

  • @PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    113 months ago

    As a rabblerouser above 18, if I browse the Restricted Stacks and accidentally forget them in the YA stacks, how much shit would those librarians be put through?

    • AutistoMephisto
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Why bother with that? I say go full Robin Hood, steal the restricted books and give them away to the youth. Or, if you’ve got the resources, run a black market library. It would be kinda like a speakeasy, with a password and a doorman and shit. Call it a “readeasy”? Since you’re not supposed to talk in a library and all that.

    • @Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      I’d say, whatever you do, it has to be obvious that the librarians are innocent. So I’d say ‘accidentally’ forgetting the stacks in the wrong section is out.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      They’re not playing the game in good faith. Please don’t help the bad people shut down libraries.

  • rand_alpha19
    link
    fedilink
    93 months ago

    I wonder how much money is spent on paper and ink for the affidavits. And I guess the extra workers, inside and outside of the library, needed to process and file them all.

    • @YourNetworkIsHaunted
      link
      143 months ago

      Hah! You think they actually put in place the infrastructure needed to support this asinine policy. If there aren’t enough people to get the affidavits signed then those kids can’t go expose themselves to dangerous ideas, presumably including “trans people exist” and “slavery was bad, actually”.

      See also voter ID laws that just happen to come into effect as the DMV offices in poor and/or black neighborhoods close down. If they make it a sufficient pain in the ass they don’t have to take the legal or political flak for outright banning it.

      • rand_alpha19
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Yes, it seems that I stupidly overlooked that the purpose isn’t to make things difficult to look at via bureaucracy but instead to make things impossible to look at via the lack of resources to comply.