• Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      802 years ago

      Or maybe tell bosses that if your job can be done remotely it should be done remotely. Then there’s more room on the bus for people who need to be in meatspace to do their jobs.

          • 🦄🦄🦄
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            They kinda forgot that unions and strikes are already the better alternative for them.

          • Dojan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            As much as I enjoy wanton violence for the ruling elite, a good start would be threatening the politicians with this unless they implement laws that make it unprofitable to force people into offices.

            It should be codified that if a job can be performed remotely, it ought be, with the voluntary option to have people go to offices and such.

      • Wrench Wizard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I wish I didn’t need hands for my job, 90% of it is brain work with a tinker here and there. I see so many videos of robotic hands being used for things and can’t wait for the day I can just send one of these out to a site equipped with some tools and just remotely tap into the video stream. It’s coming and I don’t think it will be too long. Hell, I’m just a layman and if you gave me a dedicated year and some funding I could get something viable up to par so I’m sure it’s possible, guess it just won’t profit anyone enough to sell it yet.

    • @odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      While I agree with the comparison in the post, the trolleybus powered by renewable energy shouldn’t be compared to gas cars.

      It should be compared to electric cars powered by renewable energy.

      • Lutz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        272 years ago

        I disagree, the bus is still replacing the purpose of the gas cars. The bus should just be compared to both gas and electric cars.

      • @Player2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        It is easier and cheaper to make one larger electric vehicle than 68 smaller ones, and they would damage the road less too. Of course this kind of comparison between two different things is inherently very difficult to do fairly

      • @uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Trolleybuses are much lighter, cheaper and reliable than regular electric bus or car. Also: a car is still a car.

        • @odium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Ik that ttolleybuses are better than electric cars in carbon footprint, traffic, etc. I’m just proposing that we compare things with the same power source together. It makes more impact to say that an electric trolley is x% better on y metric compared to electric cars, than to say they are x% better than gas cars.

          Imagine a situation where you say electric trolleybuses are superior to gas cars for reasons x, y, and z on xcretion or speddit. Then some elon musk bootlicker or big oil bootlicker replies to you saying “what about electric cars” or “what about gas buses”? You craft a meticulous reply about why gas buses are better than electric cars. But it’s too late. Thousands of lurkers saw the bootlicker’s reply to you but will never see your rebuttal. Many of them are now more against public transportation.

      • @moitoi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Nope, a car electric or not creates multiple issues like urbanism, pollution (i.e: noise, visual, microplastics), hotspots, hostiles environment like parking lots, increase deaths rates, consequences on flooding, etc.

        A lot of them can be solved with public transportation.

      • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        How are buses still not better? The ratio of individual people being moved to total mass being moved is better. The maintenance and insurance fees are collective. The driver of the bus is a trained professional vs some rando commuter.

    • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      We used to have trolleybuses when I was a kid in the 70’s, they were so insanely much more nice to ride than a diesel. No bad smell, and they were smooth and quiet.

      I guess we will get back to something similar soon, but with batteries.

        • @Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Yes in some aspects, it’s like we are moving backwards. Funny since the talk about environment is more serious now than back then, still we often use unnecessarily polluting solutions, where the older “too expensive” solutions were viable when we had way less money as a country than we have now?

          One would have thought the oil crisis had made us keep the trolley busses?

      • @uberrice@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Until in 5-10 years when the batteries are fucked.

        That’s the beautiful thing about trolley buses - they do not need a (substantial) battery. They are basically trains on wheels.

        There are some places where battery powered buses make sense - for example, where I live, lucerne Switzerland, there is one bus line that just goes up and down a rather steep hill. By using recuperative braking, the battery powered bus is super efficient. For other, normal ‘high traffic’ lines, trolley makes so much more sense

        • @Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Trolleys don’t really make any sense. I come from Riga, it has a lot of trolleys and the city is designed around trolleys and trams. And yet modern trolleys have bloody diesel engines, because being permanently hooked to the wire makes no sense at all. It’s much better to have electric buses with a few overhead wires here and there to fast charge on the go.

          • @uberrice@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Lucerne has a few trolley lines. They are ONLY trolley buses. The long, 3 Segment ones. Then, some 1 Segment hybrid buses that have pantagraphs. At the end of those lines, there is a longer stop where the trolley lines end, the pantagraph gets pulled down and the bus trucks along the last few stations with diesel.

            Then theres just normal hybrid buses for more rural lines, and a battery operated bus that goes up and down a hill.

            There’s a solution for every line - you just need the proper infrastructure. The reason that we have this great pantagraph-compatible infrastructure is that, while there are a lot of trains in Switzerland, there is no metro. So in lucerne, the trolley buses work almost as a metro, with the main lines having buses every 7 minutes.

        • @iminahurry@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          That was, of course, just a random example of a job that cannot be done from home. A lot of jobs do require physical presence of people, that’s all I was trying to say.

          Of course, a milkman would also require to travel to and fro their place of work, dunno why they cannot be on a bus for that.

          • @Syldon@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            You do not actually see many milkmen these days. A milkman’s business was ran a bit like McDonalds’s with the milkman buying the as an individual and then selling it door to door. Every single milkman that I have known has worked from home.

            So kind of a bad example but I get your point. No not all people can work from home, but those who can should surely be given that option. I have a wife who is a civil servant. She is required to travel to work for 40% of her hours worked. This is for no other reason than going into work by direction of the Tory party. This was not really an issue until they moved the place of work 8 miles away. She literally has to pay for a bus, sit on a bus for an hour each way, while carrying all her PC equipment with her, just so she can do exactly the same job while sitting in an office. All her meetings are done online, even while in the office. So there is a lot to be said regarding this Tory agenda of forcing people to work from the office just to appease their Donors.

        • @uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago
          1. Dormitory day before morning shift
          • Example: Moscow metro, national railway
          1. Night shift
          • Example: major city, national railway
          1. PMV
          • Example: a city
          1. Car
          • Example: shithole without public transit

          To be fair 1 person using car is not 450 people that could use a car. To be fair at most 20% of people have a car in heavily car-centric cities. In good cities it hangs in single-digit.

        • @moitoi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          At some point, public transport had housing nearby the depots. Employees could walk or bicycle to the workplace.

          Then some douchebag neoliberal thinking @&€#!?/((+ thought it was privilege and that it has to be cut…

  • @Drun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    402 years ago

    Ah, you should see buses in my city. Dirty, thirty years old, overpopulated graves on wheels with no air conditioners.

    Never again.

  • @Rambler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    Recently visited York (UK) and they have a fantastic bus system - and they’re electric.

    • @Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      Busses in my city are also going electric. So far only the local routes. The longer distance routes are still diesel

    • @Jeanschyso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      432 years ago

      Imagine how bad it would be without the tube and busses! All these people trying to drive in London? Just thinking about it I shudder and I’ve never even seen London.

    • @severspade@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      According to a study conducted in 1000 cities in 50 countries based on data from connected vehicles and phones. Not disagreeing with the premise but I expect there are plenty of other more “congested” cities, visit Manila or Jakarta for example. The UK should however definitely do more to fund its public infrastructure.

    • @aracebo@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Not all sources agree on that. Also, I can think of a way or two to eliminate all traffic congestion.

      • @Lime66@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        At least in my experience most of the traffic is people trying to go into London from commuter towns, and they’ll take the motorways not the streets

  • danielfgom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    It makes a good point but only if your country actually has public transport.

    If you live somewhere with zero public transport, the car is your only option.

    • @Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      You make a good point but only if your country actually has roads.

      If you live somewhere with no paved roads and only railroads, then that and walking are your only options.

      (Sarcasm but I’m curious if you see the point)

        • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Well yes, except all the railroads where removed. Just lifted trucks and gravel roads as far as the eye can see.

      • Lemminary
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You make a good point but only if your country has people.

        If you live somewhere with no people and only animals, then you can’t get anywhere and must traverse the jungle with a machete and a canteen full of either rainwater or your own piss.

    • @Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      If you live somewhere, you’re a part of the body that decides things like that. If you want public transit in your community, and you certainly should, take the steps to get the action started.

      Nobody is going to change the world on our behalf; it all falls on us.

        • @Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Starts by being an active member of the community. Attend counsel meetings, town hearings, etc. Bring up the topic at these, gauge the response. Talk to the people who seem enthusiastic in response. Work together and build a petition, then seek signatures first amongst the people who attend, then talk to your neighbors.

          I never said it was going to be easy, I only said nobody else is going to do it on your behalf.

    • XiELEd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      That’s why the post advocates for public transport. So that we can have better options.

  • @Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That’s great when all those people live in the same block and go to work at the same company and have the same hours.

    But Frank lives 10 miles away and works on the other side of town. And Tim lives 3 towns over and works the night shift. Bill lives in the country and works 40 miles away. Eddy lost a leg in the war and while he is only 1/2 mile from the bus station, can’t walk that far with his disability.

    When it is convenient, it is convenient, but there’s a reason why when given the choice, most normal people will drive their car instead no matter what the nonsense in this subs likes to pretend is real.

    • @totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      Don’t forget Susan, whose base wages are so low that she has to work overtime to make ends meet. But the bus doesn’t run that late, so 2/3 of her overtime goes to an uber, whose driver also can’t feed her children.

    • @uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      can’t walk that far with his disability.

      Neither he can drive. Or in some countries even not allowed to.

      while he is only 1/2 mile from the bus station

      1. This is seriously fucked.
      2. Powered wheelchair.
      • @Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Hand-controls are a thing. Eddy is perfectly fine driving his handi-van around. He’s not too keen on when motorcycles part in between the handicapped spots though.

        • @Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Jessie got shot in the face in the war, his lack of depth perception from having one eye stops him from driving.

          Fred, Stephanie, Phil, Jack, and Masha all have severe hearing loss from the war (Jack’s is actually from training for the war), while they can still drive, it’s safer for them not too.

          Nick, Chloe, Phil (different Phil), and Jessie (same Jessie) all got blown up in the war, driving vehicles is extremely stressful for them. Being a passenger to varying less degrees. Trains don’t seem to trigger any reaction, and busses don’t for at least one of them (not sure about the others)

    • stevedidWHAT
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The post is a meme about how buses are a better option than cars because they can transport more people at once using amount of gas less than what would be done on a 1:1 basis.

      I feel like you’ve not ridden a bus before though - you didn’t mention schedules or routes once which solve the majority of your claimed points.

      The disabled persons perspective is an interesting point, but shuttle services for the disabled would be even easier to run, as they would require vans instead of buses. Also, choosing to live in the country side away from bus routes when you can’t fucking walking is not the fault of the bus haha

    • XiELEd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Maybe your public transport infrastructure needs improvement? I don’t think this post wants to judge you— it’s advocating for public transport to be paid more attention. My cousin lives 3 towns away from her workplace— she commutes with a bus or jeepney. We have either buses, vans, or jeepneys; combined they operate 24/7. Hell, my university has students more than 5 municipalities away, the buses start operations early in the morning. Our classes start at 6:30 AM. Oh and btw, our buses have routes more than 300km. Maybe even more. Regarding Eddy, we have something in my country called a motorela or a tricycle, that operates locally in neighbourhoods. He won’t have to walk far, he just has to wait for one and let it deliver him to a waiting area.

      • XiELEd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Not only that, there are buses intended for long and short routes. So even if you live some towns away, your bus won’t have to stop as often.

      • @cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        The only issue I have with this is there’s a British gallon (that is DIFFERENT from the American gallon) that is used to measure milk. :D. That was the only place I saw gallon being used.

        • TheEmpireStrikesDak
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          When I think tonne, I think 1000kg. When I think ton, I just think of the vernacular “tons of stuff” type expression.

      • TheEmpireStrikesDak
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Actually, as much as I dislike imperial units, when it comes to body temperature I do think in Fahrenheit. Mostly because that’s how my mum would tell if we were too sick to go to school. 99 - just a little ill, but you can have the day off. 100 - pretty ill, probably at least 3 days off. 101+ - super mega ill, off all week.

        • @Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          For some reason I think, driving distance is kilometers, while driving speed is miles per hour. Is that right?

            • @Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              If you read the Highway Code, you’ll learn that it’s all over the place. Long distances on signs are in miles. But distance markers are placed in metres. But emergency phones are placed every mile. And distance markers, which are placed in metres and indicate distances in meters can also have a distance to the next emergency phone in fucking yards. One sign, two numbers, no letters, two systems. FUCKING HELL!!!

    • @uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Reminds me article name from USSR newspaper about plane crash: “Gallons let down”/“Подвели галлоны”.

  • Bipta
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    This was a lot more appealing before COVID.

      • @chocoladisco@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 years ago

        Vaccines exist. COVID is not a thing anyone I know worries about anymore. I keep getting surprised on the internet.

        • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          So, it does have to be a mask that will actually protect you.

          If you didn’t pay, a pretty steep price at the time, for the right mask (like something that will protectv you from paint fumes) then you were wasting your time.

          Source: When I mask up I use N95’s. I use best judgement, haven’t gotten covid. Not too late to protect yourself. I don’t think I’ll be able to keep it up forever, but I’m banking on new vaccines kicking covids ass.

          • @lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            So “masks” don’t work. Specific masks work. No one was mandating n95 masks it was all those shitty paper ones then acting like that was sufficient.

        • @dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Fun fact. None of those things are perfect except staying away from everyone and your entire household doing so as well. Cloth masks work better when both/everyone wears one; that lowers the chance of getting infected to 3%. If only one person wears a mask, there’s a much higher risk of infection. The vaccine and booster are great, but again, not 100%. It is good to stack things in your favor, but stuff still happens. To take the small percentage where people still get sick and use that to decide masks don’t protect anyone at all is ridiculous.

          • @lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Literally the only person I know that didn’t get it was my mom and we were all masking, vaccinated, washing hands, etc. All those precautions did nothing but delay the inevitable.

            • @dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I mean, sure, but if you hadn’t used those precautions you would have gotten it sooner, likely spread it to more people who would have them spread it to more people, ect. The point wasn’t to prevent infection for eternity.

              • @lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Getting it sooner would have gotten it out of the way sooner and the whole ordeal would have been over with after it ran it’s course instead of dragging it out for 2 years.

                • @dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Not necessarily. I know several people who got it several times within that period. And we dragged it out on purpose to not overwhelm our hospitals.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    The correct answer actually should -and could- be 0 gallons if they simply cycle to work. Granted, that requires them to have the right infrastructure available, but if (once) that existed, the vast majority of the work force could cycle to work happily. Most people don’t live 20 miles or more from where they work

    • @cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It could also be 0 gallons if the busses are electrified, or if the rail system is expanded, or if we stop pushing office workers to commute every day.

      There are many routes to 0 emissions.

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Oh sure.

        I’m just sayjt that we need to change the way we live. Like you said, people should not be required to work in offices anymore. If they physically need to be at locations, let them walk for short distances, cycle for medium distances and use public transportation for large distances.

        Most cities in the world have been redesigned over the past 80 years for cars. It’s insane and it left most cities awful places to live in. Almost all Dutch cities have been redesigned for people. So people walk and cycle because they can, and the cities look and feel amazing and beautiful.

    • @WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Sure, I’d love to cycle 56km to and from work each day. Especially right after a night shift.

      We should just invent portals already.

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        56 kms is far, indeed. Thsts what you make public transportation for. Trains, busses.

        Well done, the would be more comfortable and faster than a car.

        However, I did 25 kms to and from every day. Took me 45 minutes and it was super healthy

        • XiELEd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          45 minutes is a long time near nightfall, though… Honestly I’d rather take a bus at 5PM, even at 12km, since there are other people and it feels much safer.

    • @totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      How many gallons does the ambulance take to get the cyclist to the hospital after the hit and run?

      (Seriously tho bicycles ftw except in winter)

      • @Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Winter cycling is awesome*, I can finally get to work without being sweety.

        *Winter experience is highly dependent on how well your area does SNIC

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Less, probably, because cycling in on itself is safer than driving a car. Lower speeds, less mass, less injuries.

        Also, winter cycling.is awesome

        • @totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I was being facetious; ambulance fuel use is a silly comparison :)

          Listening to all y’all winter cyclists I lament that I live in a city where the bike lanes are where the city piles up the snow it plows off the car lanes on the streets. RIP me. It gives me hope and happiness to know that there are cities that don’t do this!

          • Phoenixz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Yeah those would be cities that see bikes as children’s toys instead of what they are: a better form of medium range transit