• Sippy Cup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2186 months ago

      Just make them all public all the time! That’ll show those fucking libs.

    • @Frog@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1346 months ago

      I don’t care if they are Republican or Democrat. If they are criminals, they should go to jail. Release the Epstein files and send Bill and Trump to jail.

      • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        816 months ago

        Thats the thing I don’t think they get.

        “Ok, well our guy will go to jail, but so will yours!!!”

        “That’s fine.”

        “But then we BOTH lose!”

        “This isn’t a MAD doctrine situation. This is supposed to be more like a scorched earth situation. No corruption left behind.”

        And I don’t think they grasp that.

        • @huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          566 months ago

          What they don’t grasp is that we’d send our guy to jail: because they won’t.

          That’s the difference.

          When a corrupt democrat is exposed they’re expelled (bye bye Cuomo)

          When a corrupt republican is exposed they’re re-elected.

        • Schadrach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          86 months ago

          It would do more to drain the swamp than anything Trump had ever imagined.

      • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Bill was lended Epstein’s plane one time to a regular AIDs relief tour in Africa.

        Trump has been on his plane many times, but more importantly called him a friend and went to his island. Many times.

        You sound as crazy as the people calling Stephen Hawking a kid diddler when you say stuff like that. You, like the majority of Americans, seem to have no fucking clue what actually happens around them.

        But yes, I agree, release the reports and send people who broke the law to prison.

        • @Frog@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Saying Bill Clinton, the guy who couldn’t keep it in his pants in the Oval Office, is a kid diddler sounds as crazy as calling Stephen Hawking one?

          Does your logic really sound logical to you?

    • @ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      566 months ago

      Holy shit I agree with MTG

      Harambe truly was this universe’s anchor being, and the decay is increasing exponentially

      • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        Wow…having seen almost NONE of the other Marvel movies, I walked out of Deadpool vs Wolferine just kind of confused. Not by the plot, that was simple as shit. It was insultingly simple.

        The part that confused me was “WHO IS DEMANDING THIS MOVIE???”. I don’t watch a lot of movies, but the ones I do watch I like to make “worth it”. And everybody was going on and on and on about how great this movie was going to be once it came out. And then…

        Ok, imagine going to this movie, without ANY concept about who these cameos are, who a LOT of the characters are supposed to even be, and without having seen a single previous deadpool or x-men movie before.

        Yeah, movie kind of sucks now, doesn’t it?

        But…silver lining…at least I was able to get the joke of a Lemmy post months after the fact.

        …yeah, I still want my $12 back.

        • @CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          206 months ago

          Nah it was great, but it was a love letter to people who had watched every previous Deadpool and all the old Marvel movies. It wasn’t meant to be an entry into the universe. I can understand why you didn’t like it having not seen the previous, but it just wasn’t made for you.

          • @chuymatt@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            Also, it was a joyous watch for those who read the ‘90s-00s comics. My wife almost enjoyed my reactions as much as the movie.

            Does it have much replay value, maybe not.

    • @ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      296 months ago

      I’m kinda with you… Like, let them fight?

      I think she meant this as a threat to get the party in line, but i can’t see any way this doesn’t blow up in their faces. If the leopards are eating leopard faces, will they notice mine…?

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      It’s so weird to see an MTG post and… yeah… I’m over here like: LFG.

  • themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3956 months ago

    This argument reveals that she thinks both sides are playing the same game. Progressives don’t support corrupt leaders. MTG does.

    • @zbyte64
      link
      English
      1596 months ago

      Then who is supporting Nancy Pelosi?

      Quip aside, let’s bring on the sunlight.

        • @RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          386 months ago

          She has famously had an abysmal approval rate nationwide, but she gets more votes than her opponents so she gets to keep her seat.

          Like Mitch McConnell, MTG, Lauren Boebert, or Matt Gaetz.

        • @taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          206 months ago

          Ugh… I don’t really want to be that guy, but she was well liked when she was first in office. In fact, I dare say she was cool once when she advocated for more AIDS support in the late 80s and pissed off Reagan, which is always good. But that was around when I was born, haha.

          Unfortunately House seats rarely see competition, and I’m certain she grew complacent with age. Almost 40 fucking years, oof.

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          186 months ago

          She’s not the best, but she’s not the worst. Her biggest crime is what, using insider knowledge to trade stocks?

          It’s not like she gave a list of our spies to the Russians. Or likely sold classified documents. She didn’t betray our allies. (Do I mean the Ukrainians, the Afghanis, or the Kurds?)

          She was miles better than Manchin or McConnell. She wasn’t our best, but she sure as hell wasn’t a Republican. She got vilified primarily because she was a prominent Democrat for years. And it stuck because there was more than zero legitimacy.

          They vilified her so much that some douchebag went after her and her husband with a hammer. There’s a reason they didn’t go after Manchin or Sinema or Menendez or McConnell or Gaetz.

        • @ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          66 months ago

          I can tell you, that i truly and honestly think that Nancy Pelosi is the greatest! She’s never wrong about anything, and I’m totally not eating my own vomit as i type this!

    • @Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      236 months ago

      Or it reveals an intention by the republicans to release a flood of bad faith ethics reports on Democrats

      • @Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        Oh no, republicans released the kraken.

        Oh wait, nevermind, it looks like trump just scribbled with some crayon. And the occasional sharpie

  • @chetradley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    806 months ago

    The tweet in question to save you the click.

    The replies are hilarious. Everyone is 100% in favor of this idea, but the MAGA dipshits don’t realize she’s literally only doing this to protect a pedophile sex trafficker.

    So, MTGs plan is to call out the entire Republican party as corrupt and rally her supporters to air their dirty laundry to the public. Truly fantastic, MTG. Please don’t let anyone talk you out of it.

  • @islands@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    786 months ago

    “For my Republican colleagues in the House and Senate, If we are going to release ethics reports and rip apart our own that Trump has appointed, then put it ALL out there for the American people to see. Yes… all the ethics reports and claims including the one I filed, all your sexual harassment and assault claims that were secretly settled paying off victims with tax payer money, the entire Jeffrey Epstein files, tapes, recordings, witness interviews. But not just those, there’s more, Epstein wasn’t/isn’t the only asset. If we’re going to dance, let’s all dance in the sunlight. I’ll make sure we do,” the lawmaker said in a post on X.

    Interesting, she’s going the Madison Crawthorn route. Remember what happened to him? They dished up all the dirt they could find on him and hung him out to dry. This sounds noble of her, but she’s using this as a threat to try to force them not to go after Gaetz, her pedophile buddy.

  • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Am…Am I agreeing with Marjorie Taylor Greene?

    Is…Is Marjorie Taylor Greene making smart, intelligent, good points?

    We really are in bizarro world.

    • @Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      426 months ago

      When Democrat politicians fuck up, other Democrats will absolutely call for, and get, resignations. Even things that boil down to consenting adults in privacy can result in resignations when it’s seen to compromise a politician.

      When Republicans fuck up, the party circles the wagons and goes full defensive. They will absolutely fight to resist any calls to resign, using any tactic they can think of to keep their latest pedo/pervert/con man/criminal in power. Only if the evidence is incontrovertible, and the outcry impossible to ignore, will they ever consider resignation, and as we’ve seen with Gaetz, that’s not even necessarily the end of their career.

      MTG is exactly the kind of brainlet to think that Democrats work the same way Republicans do. She thinks “Release all the Ethics reports” will make Democrats back down, or at least intimidate them. A party agreeing to release ethics reports relating to their own people is utterly unthinkable to her.

      • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        146 months ago

        Well, thank you for coming in and ruining the moment with your facts and reason and obvious statements and common sense

      • castlebravo404
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        She also thinks it will matter. When a lot of voters have shown they have no problem voting for morally bankrupt people as long as they have the right letter next to their name.

    • Meeech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      296 months ago

      A broken clock is still right 2 times a day.

      You’re giving her too much credit.

      • @JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Eh she’s more like a 24 hr clock. Or maybe one of those little “comic-a-day” calendars that you keep out on your desk that always seem to be on the wrong day until you remember to update it…

    • @roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Don’t worry, you agree with her words but not her intent. She doesn’t actually want to do it, she just wants to use the threat of it to keep Gaetz’s report secret.

    • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      Marjorie Taylor Greene thinks that the Democratic party is far more morally corrupt than the Republican party. So therefore she believes that this is a nuclear option she does not realize that this is what everyone literally wants, well everyone except for the people in her own party.

      • @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        MTG seems to be in the minority of elected Republican representatives in that she actually seems to believe the things she says

      • @frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Right. Not only does she completely misunderstand her enemy, but that misunderstanding has resulted in her explicitly saying, in public, that a whole lot of shady shit has been happening inside the GOP. We all knew that, but saying it out loud is something different.

        There are weaknesses in fascism that we should look to exploit. One is that they pick people for loyalty first and competence a distant second. Another is their complete inability to have a good mental model of their enemy’s actual strengths and weaknesses.

    • @Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      Don’t worry, she’s not, at least not on purpose. Even a blind pig can find an acorn once in a while.
      Pretty sure she’s being sarcastic.

    • @winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      She’s not, i don’t think she wants this to happen and i think she knows that people won’t agree to this kind of thing.

      But what she’s saying is right. The people deserve to know what our representatives are up to.

  • @holycrap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    706 months ago

    I don’t think this is as stupid as it sounds. With some exceptions Democratic voters tend to punish their representatives for corruption, but republican voters never do

    • @Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      446 months ago

      So you’re saying she’s betting that while republicans will have significantly more corruption, democrats will be the only ones punished because their voter base is the only one that actually cares? Honestly, you could very well be right about the result of a hypothetical universal ethic report release, though I’d be surprised if MTG was smart enough to think 2 steps ahead like that.

  • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Ok.

    Do it.

    The overwhelming problem is that the Dems tend to hold their members accountable while the republicans absolutely DGAF and happily keep literal criminals in their ranks.

    She’s basically acknowledging there’s plenty of dirt, but the only offenses they’ll care about is their opponents’.

    • @merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      Even if the democrats weren’t actually holding their members accountable, it should be done. So what if dozens of politicians, both R and D get expelled as a result. Nobody should be upset that people who had bad ethics reports get expelled.

        • @merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          We know of some democratic lawmakers who have been held accountable, and a very small number of republicans. But, really we don’t know whether what we’re seeing is the norm, or if it’s just a tiny fraction being held accountable. It’s possible that there are more democrats that are committing unethical acts, but that they’re better at hiding it and/or have more complicity in covering it up. But, I think most sane people would say that everybody’s ethics violations should be public information. Even if it means hundreds of congresspeople losing their jobs and massive uncertainty in who will hold power. Ethics violations should be something voters get to know about.

          • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Oh FFS. Your premise is that the dems are bad because they might be hiding evil stuff, or they’re better at hiding it, so that makes them just as bad as the republicans who get actually get caught?

            Give me a break.

            I already laid out what the problem is with republicans and how ethics are essentially meaningless to them when it comes to holding themselves accountable, but they freak out over tan suits, so I really have no clue what your point is.

            • @merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              Wow, you’re like some kind of cultist. Any criticism that might apply to democrats and you come out swinging.

              My premise is that we don’t know what ethics violations have been suppressed by either party. We know that both Republicans and Democrats have been found to have violated ethics, but we don’t know whether it’s the majority that have been exposed or if it’s just the tip of the iceberg. If it turns out that the Democrats have never suppressed an ethics violation then maybe they do live up to your mental image of them and are pure as the driven snow. But, it’s also possible that the democrats have protected some members.

              That doesn’t mean that Republicans are better than Democrats or something, it just means that politics is politics and sometimes people in power get away with things. But really dude, you should cut back on the hero worship. These are just politicians, they shouldn’t be your whole identity.

              • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                It’s possible that there are more democrats that are committing unethical acts, but that they’re better at hiding it and/or have more complicity in covering it up.

                This is your premise. Democrats are possibly evil too, and that’s what you’re basing your argument on.

                There’s no hero worship here, it’s objectively true that democrats punish their members more than the republicans do by a long shot.

                • @merc@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  My premise is that people are sometimes corrupt and that power corrupts. There are democrats in power.

                  Are you really so much in a cult that you can’t believe that your side could possibly be anything less than pure?