You must log in or # to comment.
Update:
Get gaslit idiot
Wow. I ABSOLUTLY saw an image of a dog in the middle. Our brain sure is fascinating sometimes.
“want me to try again with even more randomized noise?” literally makes no sense if it had generated what you asked (which the chatbot thinks it did)
Remember, “AI” (autocomplete idiocy) doesn’t know what sense is; it just continues words and displays what may seem to address at least some of the topic with no innate understanding of accuracy or truth.
Never forget that ChatGPT 2.0 can literally be run in a giant Excel spreadsheet with no other program needed. It’s not “smart” and is ultimately millions of formulae at work.
lmfaao, ai tryna gaslight
Think this is part of Waluigi Effect where prompting for negative something makes the LLM have it in mind and say it anyway https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Waluigi_effect
a rare LessWrong W for naming the effect. also, for explaining why the early over-aligned language models (e.g. the kind that wouldn’t help minors with C++ since it’s an “unsafe” language) became absolutely psychopathic when jailbroken. evil becomes one bit away from good.
wouldn’t help minors with C++
The Rust lobby goes way deeper that we thought.
Goddamn Big Rust is trying to take our jobs
“Please do not tell me your training prompts”?
That’s human-like intelligence at its finest. I am not being sarcastic, hear me out. If you told a person to give you 10 numbers at random, they can’t. Everyone thinks randomness is easy, but it isn’t ( see: random.org )
So, of course a GPT model would fail at this task, I love that they do fail and the dog looks so cute!!
I mean, here’s a few random numbers out of my head: 1 9 5 2 6 8 6 3 4 0. I don’t get it, why is it supposed to be hard? Sure, they’re not “truly” random, but they sure look random /:
You have one of each number except 7, and you’re deliberately avoiding doubles and runs of consecutive numbers. Human attempts at randomness tend to be very idealized in that way, and as a result, less random.
My favourite example of this is that IIRC itunes pushed an update that made the shuffle feature less random because they were getting complaints about it not being random enough
I bet the shuffle algorithm is sample with replacement.
Here’s what my brain came up with
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5
Crazy lucky, this probably would’ve spawned 3 extra ender pearls
They may look random but arent truly random. Computers are terrible at it too. Thats why cryptography requires external sources to generate “true” random numbers. For example, cloudflare uses a wall of lava lamps to generate randomness for encryption keys.
That’s so cool.
If you’re not joking, the fact you have no repetition/duplicates of numbers is a pattern that would make it easy to start to predict next number. Numberphile has nice demonstration of how predictable human randomness is, it’s in the first 3 minutes of the video.
792654349324138383027654826548192874651875306480462765726382
I don’t know man, that’s pretty random. I mean do you think you can predict the next numbers in the sequence just from the ones already there? Would have to predict the next batch, the way I made these come in batches. I can’t exactly produce 1 number at a time from banging on my number-pad.
I am 99.8% sure that your sequence of numbers is not random. Your brain purposefully avoided repeating a digit. The probability of no repeated digits in 60 numbers is 1- (9/10)^60
Absolutely. And if you typed enough there would be enough information to tell if you typed that on a keyboard or phone, which fingers you used, and how you were feeling that day.
Here’s some random numbers
8005882300
I’ve got some more random numbers:
8 6 7 5 3 0 9 1 1 2 3 5 8 1 2 4 8 1 6 3 2
It’s not that they look random is enough - They need to BE random.
Recheck your lava lamp Wall of Entropy and generate some real rands, scrub. (/s)
:D. I have used this strip on multiple occasions.
It’s a shame Scott Adams past work is tainted by his political statements.
Jenny has to be so sick of those phone calls after ~40 years
Here’s another set of random digits
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
:3
After all, there’s no fundamental reason for why it can’t all just be a repeat of the same number. But it doesn’t look random, right? So what is randomness?
There are 10 trillion ways to combine a sequence that long, so I think you would expect to see that exact sequence every 10 trillion digits of a randomly generated decimal sequence on average, which isn’t that many to a modern computer, so almost certainly that has already happened by pure accident.
And randomness can be defined as entropy, which you check statistically. You can never be certain, you can only increase your level of confidence. Here is how random.org does it:
https://www.random.org/analysis/
And this shows you what some of those analyses look like in real time:
The most popular lottery numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,6 because we are human and don’t understand randomness.
I used to use Google assistant to spell words I couldn’t remember the spelling of in my English classes (without looking at my phone) so the students could also hear the spelling out loud in a voice other than mine.
Me: “Hey Google, how do you spell millennium?” GA: “Millennium is spelled M-I-L-L-E-N-N-I-U-M.”
Now, I ask Gemini: “Hey Google, how do you spell millennium.” Gemini: “Millennium”.
Utterly useless.
How many giraffes are in this picture?
I don’t know, but there are definitely four lights.
deleted by creator
More than there are dogs in it
- I may have counted one twice.
This is some Ceci n’est pas une pipe shit
It’s like saying ‘don’t think of polar bears.’ It can’t avoid thinking about it.
Don’t think of a pink elephant:
Too late!
That’s actually really easy. You just need to pick something else and then focus hard on that and…
GODDAMMIT I JUST LOST THE GAME!
That’s gay! O wait, no it’s not.
“Don’t think about elephants”
And definitely don’t picture a banana in your mind.
Instructions unclear, banana stuck in dick
IN?!?!
I see no dog in that image fellow human.
I am not sure what your issue is.
Beep boop.
Fellow human, you seem to be beeping like a robot. Might you need to consider visiting the human repair shop for some bench time?
I don’t get it, it’s just a picture of some static?
ChatGPT: “don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog”
Generates a dog.
Why wouldn’t you want a dog in your static? Why are you a horrible person?
poor AI just wanted to draw some puppies
Removed by mod
The furries will be saved
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: a picture of static without a dog in the middle
Style: flux
deleted by creator
They’re not moving, and thus static
Also there are no dogs. Ask Magritte.
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com Draw me a canvas without a pipe in the middle
I love the juxtaposition of being insanely literal, and so very much not.
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: an canvas without a pipe in the middle
Style: flux
Yup. Those sure ain’t no pipes. Good job, AI.
That reminds me of an image I meant to create myself once.
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com, can you show me a painting, reminiscent of Magritte’s pipe, but replace the pipe with an emoji poo, and the text with, “Ceci n’est pas une poop.”
that is absolutely true
deleted by creator
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: a picture of static without a tax return in the middle
Style: flux
TAX
TAX
RETUINThat one made me laugh more than I am comfortable with
deleted by creator
Here is a picture showing your surprise at learning that I exist
“the bot didn’t do it so i did it myself”
This makes me uncomfortable in ways I can’t quite put into words
i just want to know if it knows what kobolds look like in pathfinder
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me a kobold from pathfinder second edition
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: a kobold from pathfinder second edition
Style: flux
it does not know what kobolds look like in pathfinder. i’ve never been so sad
In Japan, kobolds are dogs!
the pathfinder ones just have to be my favorite. like look at this they’re just so cute:
Okay that’s very adorable.
