• movies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    202
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anything but trying to solve the underlying problems. Bonus: someone makes bank.

    • Dadifer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s literally no number of children that can die before reasonable action is taken.

      • 37piecesof_flare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not the number that matters, it’s whose kids it is getting killed. If someone were to shoot up a school filled with politicians’ kids you’ll see some change rapidly.

        • Tower@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          When a dude’s gettin’ bullied and shoots up his school

          And they blame it on Marilyn and the heroin

          Where were the parents at?

          And look where it’s at

          Middle America, now it’s a tragedy

          Now it’s so sad to see

          An upper-class city havin’ this happenin’…

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          but its less likely to happen since private schools tend to be in wealthy areas, and is probably gated up. and PRIVATE school admins/rich parents are very quick to get rid of “problem students” aka “quiet dismissal but not outright expulsion”, a public schools wont do that, unless it becomes serious. i was in a sub about youtube channels owner(used to follow who sent thier kid to a private school, he was forced to leave because he was displaying aggressive behaviour from seizure meds, and the school was pressuring/ostracizing the students to leave the school, last i heard the kid sits at home and does nothing.)

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pray for your drone overlords to suicide bomb the mentally disturbed with too many guns before it’s too late!

      • Fern@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just waiting for the reports of privacy violations, and noise issues, let’s just hope that’s as bad as this gets.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I actually saw a news segment on the demo, and they said they would be thrilled if they were able to put these in every classroom and never have to use it. Im sure you would, buddy…

      • Philote@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        I grew up in a racist environment and parroted what was around me most of my young life. It’s all I knew, I didn’t change until I experienced the world and broadened my world view. Many of these “bigots” are ignorant and exploited. They are not evil people that should be eliminated. Your way of intolerance is the same type of ignorance you claim to hate. Dehumanizing any person or group as below you and therefore justify violence against is the worse part of society and the thing that needs to be cured. Racism is just one facet of that beast.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Clearly, you’re not from this planet…we’re going through a shitty period right now

            looks at crime stats / looks at quantity and scale of wars / looks at quality of sanitation

            Naw, we have it pretty damn good compared compared to basically all of history.

            Certainly doesn’t mean we shouldn’t strive to continue to improve.

  • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    ✅ Don’t fix the underlying program
    ✅ Give $557,000 to a miltech company
    We did it Patrick! We saved the city!

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        State sponsored actors? I’m 30% on that, 70% on one of the kids doing it. Maybe I have too much faith in today’s youth and their capacity for tech.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Could be some incel hackers from 4chan. Like people who engage in swatting would like this.

          • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            See, but even the swatters are script-kiddie equivalents. Most of the ‘computer nerds’ that some people in this thread are fetishizing / waxing nostalgic about were just following advice and guides of much more capable adults in the various industries. So if any smart person starts releasing guides about the drones’ systems, then sure, we’ll see some kids hack them, but I doubt we’ll see it happen, considering the drones’ rarity and limited access for most folks.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe I have too much faith in today’s youth and their capacity for tech.

          Sadly, I think maybe you do. 15 years ago, sure. Today, most of these kids aren’t using real computers. They grew up on Android or iOS devices, they’re using Chromebooks in school. They don’t actually know what a filesystem is, they don’t actually know what a network stack is. They’ve never just messed around with an os or pirated a video game.

          I don’t think it’s the kids though, I guess I’m just pretty cynical about the current state of technology. It’s advanced a lot in the past couple of decades, but I’m not sure it’s really improved. It used to be that computers were a powerful tool that we could take advantage of, and they could make things easier and be a lot of fun to play with too. These days it feels like we’re the tools and the technology is taking advantage of us. And I think this generation that grew up on mobile devices has it the worst. Tech has really been able to sink its teeth into this generation, and they can’t escape it.

          • dickalan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            You say this, but there was that autistic kid that fucking hacked rockstar with a fire stick so hackers will always be around, but they probably always be the most autistic people you have ever met

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It’s true, there’s always the exceptions, the edge cases. But if I’m thinking about this statistically, who’s likely to breach this first? How many hackers from column A are hammering on this, how many from column B? I just think state actors and corporate interests are in fact the thing to watch out for. There just seem to be much fewer gen z computer geeks than there were millennials.

              • dickalan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Maybe Apple Computer colluded with the United States government dumb everybody down to keep themselves safe safer Who Knows lol

                • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Heh, maybe the problem started when they changed their name. They aren’t “Apple Computer” any more, they’re just “Apple”. That must have happened somewhere around 2005.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 months ago

    High speed LETHAL Drones flying through schools DOESNT effect Children! DRAG Queens EXISTING does!

  • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If this gets any visibility, I do have some familiarity with the weapon on board.

    They call it a “pepper spray bomb” but more accurately pepper spray is generally not what your want because it sticks to walls. The “pepper” in the spray is an oil and imagine cleaning an oil off walls and stuff. If it gets into ventilation you will be breathing it for a week afterward.

    No, what’s on board these is probably Pava Powder. Think Baby Powder, but s p i c y. Pava has many of the same reactions as pepper sprays, coughing, watery eyes etc. But it works better IN enclosed areas like hallways and enclosed spaces. Prisons love this stuff for incidents bigger than like 3-5 people. It can be packed into a paintball, and works in normal paintball guns (it also comes in a 40mm grenade featuring timed release!) Pava is much easier to clean, you just have to have good ventilation, as it will dissipate normally. It also doesnt trigger allergies like pepper spray can, and all it takes is a nice shower to wash yourself of it. Its really a great choice for the intended settings in which it is often deployed.

    In a mobile form like drones, I can’t see the drone loading more than 10 balls due to weight, and if you’ve ever been paintballing you’d know 10 ain’t shit. A normal paintball hopper holds about 80, and for pava powder you need to score a fair number of hits or just paint a hallway with them to reach effective saturation. If each drone can hold 20-30 maybe it becomes feasible. It only takes a couple to actually do the work, but in a prison theres nowhere to run. You sit and take that accumulation. But school hallways can be 14 feet wide or more and a shooter has access to the entire building, so any misses simply…miss and begin saturating an area the shooter is leaving.

    The alarm on the drone giving the shooters position away is a great touch.

    Thats the fact side of things, opinion wise? Man we will do anything but fix the problems. These drones and pava are a great uh…answer for the locale, but it doesnt answer why you have a problem you need a prison grade solution. Pava dissipates into the air and its not that hard to begin to choke on your own breath. A deployment of these will give away the positions of students in adjacent rooms to the shooter. And you can fight it (you can fight pepper pray too), it’s just a matter of willpower to fight through choking air. It also guarantees a shooter will attempt to relocate in the building to outrun the pava clouds. Unless theres a way to quickly reload these drones in their ceiling mounts, the low ammo count is going to get them to fire around the halls, and will be more of a deterrent and could be effective at getting a shooter to stay away from populated rooms than actually subduing them and getting them to surrender. The alarm however i like at face value acting as a clear warning for where the shooter is at that moment. A drone following the shooter giving their position away is a fantastic solution if we aren’t going to address actual shootings.

    7/10 nonlethal solution, with some side effects. I like the idea but the obvious workarounds like a mask, and causing entire rooms to start coughing and alerting the shooter to empty/full rooms, on top of the shooter wildly taking shots at the ceiling to kill an alarming drone causes a host of additional issues. For the pricetag the school could hire like 3 off-duty cops who do their job when a shooter arrives. So thats also a factor. We could also like…address mental health issues or access to firearms but this is America where we pray for evil things to stop rather than actually adressing it so, that wasn’t an answer anyway

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Entities hiring private drone security to fill in for demonstrably unreliable police is so cyberpunk

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I mean it fires pepper spray bombs. Even when it does its job correctly, and hits an assailant, it is a wide area weapon that takes time to dissipate, particularly in an enclosed space. It will almost certainly effect other people to some degree, including those fleeing.

      I don’t have a problem with pepper bombs being autonomously fired on an armed assailant, in itself, by which I mean it’s better than an autonomous pistol firing slugs into “assailants”. I would even accept some minimized-as-much-as-possible risk that it incorrectly targets the wrong person with pepper spray if they are not in immediate danger. The problem will be when the pepper bombs slow down those fleeing or divert them towards the gunman or leave someone incapacitated and unable to flee or sense danger, and hinder emergency response teams, school staff, or other individuals trying to rescue kids. A clever gunman with a gas mask could even use the drones to corral victims into easy targets. It’s just not a reliable fix to the problem and creates opportunities for whole new problems.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    drones can soar through school halls at 100 mph […] and can fly through double-paned glass

    Ah yes, let’s fly a deadly projectile through the hallway … maybe shatter some glass for extra shrapnel. What could go wrong?

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s probably safer than other solutions that other countries have tried… Certainly safer than, say, banning firearms.

      So many countries tried that option and have you seen their school shootings statistics?

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        So many countries tried that option and have you seen their school shootings statistics?

        Have you seen the size of their firearm and miltech industries? Pathetic! Guns are a tool for wealth accumulation through creating an arms race where one didn’t previously exist!

        (I’d sarcasm tag except I’m starting to be convinced that the above is in fact the motivation behind it all)

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, considering the cops are just going to play on their phones and actively stop people from trying to rescue children (Uvalde was more fucked up than most people remember), it makes sense to consider alternatives.

    In all seriousness, this is actually a ridiculously hard problem and a horrible “solution”. Drone weapons work best against unaware/unattentive enemies in a target rich environment. While a bunch of russians are goofing off and not even bothering to close the hatch on their tanks you fly forward with a couple pounds of explosives duct taped to the drone and detonate when you get in range.

    Against a shooter who is already having an endorphin high from murdering a bunch of kids and is on high alert for if/when the cops will stop their fun? They’ll hear the motors echoing through the hallways even louder than the kindergarteners bleeding out and crying for their parents who have been handcuffed for daring to try to help. They’ll shoot more kids in the time it takes the drone to get to them and children gasping for breath will likely die as their airways close up from the pepper spray bombs. Or the drone will hit a kid anyway since aiming those at high speed needs VERY good reflexes and skills.

    Again, we all know the actual way to reduce the number of children murdered in school shootings. But clearly The Second Amendment is more important than the death of a few thousand kids.

    • shalafi@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Uvalde was not what most think. It was an absolute clusterfuck of communication, not so much cowardice. Several people in charge at once, conflicting orders, no one in charge, wait, you’re not in charge?!

      If someone, anyone, would have said, “Fuck this, fuck you, fuck you, fuck all y’all, I’m in command! ON ME!”, and charged, it would have been over in 1 minute flat. Many of those cops were champing at the bit to get in there, but comms and leadership was a fucking mess.

      If your heart can take it, this PBS documentary is excellent.

      I can never watch it again, bit I wish anyone with an opinion on the event would give it a spin.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m going to disagree with you here. I think this is an excellent use of drones. If anything, Uvalde taught us that human versions of policing have one major defect/feature…they also don’t want to die.

      You throw a swarm of drones whizzing into a high pressure scenario, the shooter’s fight or flight response is going to be triggered. They’re either going to pop off a few last shots…which they likely were going to do anyway before getting caught, or they’re going to run to the nearest open door and shut it to hide.

      No lethal explosives needed for this use case. A few flash bangs, maybe some tear gas, a taser or two would likely do the trick in all but the most dire of situations.

      Now, what this says for our constitutional rights on the other hand…at some point we as a collective society are going to have to decide whether we want to be “free” or whether we want to be “safe”. Personally, I’m none too happy with the way I’ve seen things progress over the last 24 years.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        We’ve become less of both, free and safe. I don’t see this helping either of those. Btw, I just learned that the Ben Franklin quote of liberty or safety is actually out of context and was concerning a specific situation in Pennsylvania. The general idea was, don’t take away our freedom in the name of safety, give us the freedom and ability to make ourselves safe. I see these drones as an arms race to let the police do what they want to do without being in danger themselves. Oh, the kids? Well, sorry about that, shooting people is all the police are trained on.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have a nasty feeling that getting hit by one of these is going to be very traumatic in the medical sense. A 10-20 pound object with fast spinning blades flying at up to 100mph in an enclosed space? The tragedy practically writes itself!

        Kid pulls a gun in a classroom, shoots a couple of classmates before another kid starts wrestling him for the gun, ultimately the shooter and 3 students are killed a couple more wounded. Meanwhile the drones are automatically deployed in the hallways by the sound of gunfire. Their pilot is on vacation today so it goes to the on-call pilot who’s currently chilling in the pool when the call comes in and therefore doesn’t answer immediately. The drones are fully automated for the first 15 minutes of the incident because of this delay. One has its AI interpret a kids fortnite shirt depicting a sentient banana throwing a grenade as the assailant, flies through a window to get to them shattering it and blinding one kid, the drone however is damaged by the window and flies erratically hitting a few students in the heads giving them head injuries before crashing into the floor and shooting it’s entire payload in all directions. Another drone clips a wall and crashes into the face of another student severely lacerating their face. Another interprets a pair of crutches as weapons that a kid with a broken leg is using to get to his next class, and pepper sprays him and blares alarms at him causing him to fall and break another limb, meanwhile the cops arrive on scene and pile onto the incompacitated and even more injured kid as obviously the assailant because the drones AI identified him, one trigger happy officer shoots him, and this is the moment the drone pilot finally comes online and starts powering them down since he could see from the drone that went to the source of the gunshot and related it’s camera feed that the incident is cleared. Ultimately the gunman killed 3, and injured 3 more while the drones killed 4, injured 20 and police shot one more innocent because they trusted the drone’s identification (oh and the innocent who was shot is initially blamed as the shooter while the cops try to cover their asses, and 20 more schools order drones due to this “success”)

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago
    You may ask yourself, "What is that beautiful drone?"
    You may ask yourself, "Where does that attack drone go to?"
    And you may ask yourself, "Is this right, is this wrong?"
    And you may say to yourself, "My God, what have we done?!"
    
  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes more weapons instead of tougher laws on existing weapons.