The ‘Middle East Eye’ is a very questionable news source (that is banned even in some Middle East countries) with obscure ownership and a very selective approach in its topics and content. It may not be wrong to post articles by them once in a while, but OP is posting almost exclusively form this highly biased source.
The Media Bias Fact Checking is only one source. It does not mean they are always right, of course. You post almost all your articles from one source, and all convey the same narrative.
What claim? The Media Bias Fact Checking is only one source of information and you post the majority of article from a single source, and the vast majority of you 20 or so posts are form the Middle East Eye.
You’ll find information about this media outlet across the web, they even have a Wikipedia page. They don’t disclose their ownership and it’s unclear where the funding comes from.
“Let’s criticize something irrelevant to the topic at hand as to discredit OP in some way.”
How about you comment about how this particular piece is misinformation or has some sort of agenda, how it’s leaving out facts, misrepresenting them or similar?
The ‘Middle East Eye’ is a very questionable news source (that is banned even in some Middle East countries) with obscure ownership and a very selective approach in its topics and content. It may not be wrong to post articles by them once in a while, but OP is posting almost exclusively form this highly biased source.
Even the Media Bias Fact Checking considers Middle East Eye “high credibility”, despite the MBFC having a pro US pro Israel bias.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/middle-east-eye/
The Media Bias Fact Checking is only one source. It does not mean they are always right, of course. You post almost all your articles from one source, and all convey the same narrative.
I’d be happy for you to provide sources for your claim then.
What claim? The Media Bias Fact Checking is only one source of information and you post the majority of article from a single source, and the vast majority of you 20 or so posts are form the Middle East Eye.
You’ll find information about this media outlet across the web, they even have a Wikipedia page. They don’t disclose their ownership and it’s unclear where the funding comes from.
Why don’t you find some information on the web and then present your case?
What do you even want? You’re just bitching about the source, not even that its wrong. You haven’t said anything.
“Let’s criticize something irrelevant to the topic at hand as to discredit OP in some way.”
How about you comment about how this particular piece is misinformation or has some sort of agenda, how it’s leaving out facts, misrepresenting them or similar?
What about this article did you find questionable exactly?
This comment doesn’t add anything to this discussion.