• Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t even tell if this has been edited lol.

      Hard to believe his face is that tiny.

      I guess that’s why the shooter aimed for the neck?

          • Zozano@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            3 months ago

            The fact that 110% looks wrong, despite knowing it’s normal facial proportions, deeply unsettles me

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            IMO 104% looks normal. 110% looks plausible, but makes his mouth look a bit big for his jaw. 100% looks completely implausible. The space between the eyes shouldn’t be smaller than the space from the eye to the side of the head.

            • Ghis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yup 104% is the most human. Came to that conclusion when I found the site 2 days ago lmfao

              Dudes face looked way smaller than 96% of normal proportions though, but I don’t know how percentages work (if that 4% isn’t linear or something)

      • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        He was wearing kevlar, and the shooter was likely aware of that, so head or neck were the only possible targets.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          The neck is never going to be a target. The fact he was hit in the neck means the shooter missed, but got lucky.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Or the neck hit was more chance. There’s an assumption that the shooter hit precisely where he was aiming, but it could have just been where the bullet happened to hit, close to the amining point, but not exact.

          • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Had been for a long time, it’s almost standard for controversial public speakers in some circles

            • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Huh. First I’ve heard about it. Guess he knew the hate he was spreading was going to incite something.

            • Fenderfreek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Even if so, nothing short of level 4 plates would have stopped a rifle round with that much energy. Handguns, sure, but he didn’t appear to be wearing a plate carrier.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        My theory as someone who isn’t a soldier or into killing people is that skulls can be pretty tough and a bullet at a slight angle could ricochet off. Ain’t nothing ricocheting off your neck. I think the shooter knew exactly what he was doing.