• James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    21 days ago

    🤞pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite🤞

    I’m going to install CachyOS, an Arch-based distro

    oh god dammit

    • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      CachyOS has been flawless on my S/O’s desktop. From an easy install to plenty of documentation available, I couldn’t have asked for much more. During install, there’s an entire step dedicated to checking a box if you want to play games. (To enable non-free drivers).

      I don’t think it was a poor choice.

        • Mesophar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          21 days ago

          They didn’t say it required documentation, they said it had plenty of documentation should you need it.

            • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              21 days ago

              Just a heads up- You appear to be interpreting things in a strictly literal sense.

              Some people might view this as trolling.

            • Mesophar@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 days ago

              Damnit, you’re right!

              But for real, I think you misunderstand the point of documentation. Even if something were truly, literally flawless, having documentation would still be a net gain. It isn’t only to fix something when it goes wrong, but explains how things are working. If the only way for something to be literally flawless in your world view is for it to be so self explanatory that an idiot seeing it for the first time still understands it perfectly, nothing in computing can be flawless in that way.

              The pedantry on this point is so unhelpful as to be actively harmful to the rest of the discussion.

        • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          21 days ago

          There are instructions on your McDonalds coffee that say, “This coffee is hot.”

          You might feel as though no documentation is necessary here, but clearly it was a critical miss for someone.

            • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              Non, monsieur. He is saying that any prosuct, whether flawless or not, must have proper information about it, since we are not born knowing how to use Windows, either.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          I distro hop regularly, still have to see that one ‘flawless’ distro, or system for that matter.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      21 days ago

      Bazzite is much worse for a new user then cachy. Worse documentation and a load of quirks from being immutable.

      Frankly they would be better off with mint unless they need very up to date hardware support for like a laptop.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I installed CachyOS for a weekend and it’s now been several months. I love it.

        But I would never, ever recommend it to a new user. It still requires someone to be comfortable on the command line and it’s possible to break it if you don’t know what you’re doing.

        Bazzite just works. You install it and start logging into your accounts. It’s nearly impossible for a newcomer to break, and perfect for the vast majority of new Linux users.

        Recommending Cachy to new users hurts not only those users but the entire Linux ecosystem.

        I don’t recommend Mint, either, but only because I am a KDE cultist, I hate Cinnamon, and every time I’ve tried it on anything I’ve had frustrating hardware issues that I have never had on Fedora.

        I’m BlameTheAntifa and I have a distro-hopping addiction.

        • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Guh, I’ve been running Mint for a couple of years now and the only thing I have had it not talk to was an obsolete audio interface.

    • atmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      Are you looking for fellow Bazzite users? (I’m one of them)

      Good to meet you brother/sister! We walk a rather lonesome road but glad I stand alongside you

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      Sometimes I feel like I have to physically pull people away from things they aren’t going to like. Everyone wants to learn how to drive a semi with a b-train, but they should be starting on the good old reliable Camry.

    • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      As a veteran geek but absolute Linux noob, can you explain a bit the differences of Bazzite vs Mint? Just recently installed Mint on an old laptop, and it went quite smoothly… But the real test will be my plex server!

      • statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 days ago

        Mint is Ubuntu/Debian based and uses their Cinnamon desktop environment.

        Bazzite is Fedora based and uses KDE as the desktop environment.

        The biggest difference is that Bazzite is atomic or immutable distro. The core systems are read only so it’s harder to break. It’s also harder to tinker with. You’re mostly limited to packages that are available in their package manager. You can install other stuff via layering if you really need to tinker.

      • James R Kirk@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Bazzite is good for noobs looking for a gaming option because it’s “immutable” which means the OS filesystem can’t be edited, which makes it nearly impossible to break.

        Mint is still very noob friendly, just not immutable. Both are solid options because neither one requires any command line to get it on-par with Windows.

    • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      Just went from Bazzite to Steam OS on my TV PC. It’s a little less flexible but I don’t use desktop mode for much on the TV or want to install anything outside a few emulators and external game launchers. I’ve had too many updating issues with Bazzite over the years. The recent deal breaker was sunshine broke preventing it from updating.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Everyone uses their computer differently and you’re binded by the distro that provides.