honestly they should have just cancelled it rather than pass it around to different studios with shaky track records

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 days ago

    If you don’t plan on making a successor that plays and contains the features the userbase would expect, don’t name it like it’s a sequel.

    They ruined the name of a perfectly good franchise just to attract the fanbase, nobody wins and everyone is angry.

  • Agent_Karyo@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    An earlier statement from one of the Paradox PR reps (before release):

    “I actually played Bloodlines 1 quite recently, and it is a good game, but it is also an old game, and there are many things that would not fly today,” Lilja said. "But I understand why people were super psyched by it in 2004, because it had a lot of cool [elements], and the feeling of being a vampire is really strong, regardless of other features. But I think people, they remember their feelings about it. And if they replayed it, I think they would see that it’s a competently good game by 2004 standards, now that it’s patched.

    Seems like their approach to Bloodlines 2 isn’t much of “high flyer” in the year 2025.

    In defence of the PR rep, they were open about Bloodlines 2 not having much to do with the original and that it was more of vampire themed linear action game.

    But in that case, why would you have internal targets of 2M+ initial sales if your plan is to have a radical departure from a well known cult classic RPG known for its roleplaying and strong writing?

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not replying to you but to that statement, they’re absolutely wrong. I’ve never finished Bloodlines, life keeps getting in my way and I keep losing my save file (this is not unique to Bloodlines, there are several other games that are in the same bag). My point is every few years I start a new save on the OG bloodlines, and that game still holds out great, sure graphics are outdated, but other than that it’s a great game even by today standards, and while I haven’t played bloodlines 2, I’m fairly confident from everything I’ve seen it’s a worse game by every metric that matters. These people think that graphics can overcome anything, but that’s one of the least important parts of the game.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        To be fair, the first part of the game is by far the best. The unofficial patch adds back in a heckton of content in the late game, but even then, it feels sparse. I have very fond memories of exploring Santa Monica though. The game felt huge and exciting, even playing it for the first time in 2019.

        Damn, I should try install it again. I’m running Linux now, and if I recall, I had some problems getting it working. I should take another crack at it.

        • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          To be fair, the first part of the game is by far the best. The unofficial patch adds back in a heckton of content in the late game, but even then, it feels sparse.

          Maybe, I don’t know how far into the game I got since I never finished it. But I don’t think it ever felt empty… Although the damn zombie mission is one I hate and has made me quit the game in more than one occasion.

          I’m running Linux now

          I have been running Linux only for over a decade, so I can confidently say the game runs, and in Steam is just hit play.

          • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Were you running it with the unofficial patch? I don’t remember what it was that was causing me problems, but it’s possible that was it.

            • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              I don’t remember, probably not last time, but I remember doing some patching in the past.

  • rozodru@pie.andmc.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 days ago

    I honestly don’t know what Paradox was smoking with this one. They get the license, cool, they hand it off to a studio that…while is known for being a support dev or doing ports they DID manage to get the original Bloodlines writer on board and then it was delay, delay, delay, fire the creative team, more delay, switch studios, start completely over, call it a day, and then claim “yeah we’re not going to make one of these style games again…we’d rather continue to nickle and dime our customers with strategy games.”

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 days ago

    Publishers are a key ingredient in the recipe for trash games. Buying IP and telling some dev team that is doing it for the paycheck to slap something together is not making a game, it’s parasitism.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    Can’t wait for the next sequel that will be some kind of live-service multiplayer game with lots of cosmetic DLC.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    Paradox has lately been really good at admitting fault and then mismanaging the next big game outside of their bread and butter grand strategy games. They need to shake up their management because it’s becoming clear they’re giving unrealistic timelines/budgets/demands for these games

  • blomvik@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    When they announced the pre-order bonus, it seems clear that this might not be a good day one purchase. Will probably give it a look some time, but i should replay Troikas version first.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    What? VTM2 came out?

    When?

    I legitimately did not know it was released.

    Is that part of why its flopping?

    Or is the gameplay bugged to fuck/story shit/etc?

    • regdog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Don’t get too exited. Maybe in a year or two all the bad has been patched out and it might become an actually good game.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, that seems par for the course with current Paradox games the past few years…

          Cities Skylines is 2 years old and still shit, too… Hell paradox is even going so far as to change the dev company working on it at the start of next year. Which is doing wonders for peoples hope for the future of the game /s

  • Arkthos@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Paradox owns the world of darkness ip entirely right now. I wonder if this call to refocus their efforts on their core competencies will mean selling it off.

    They haven’t done too well with it. They’ve released several games and I think some solo dev interactive fiction have been the only ones getting positive reviews: Earthblood, Swansong, Bloodhunt, and now Bloodlines 2 have all done pretty poorly. Even the tabletop RPG has seen better days, with 5th edition causing quite the controversy, mostly with Werewolf. Hell they closed White Wolf down for a while because the books caused controversy.

    Paradox have done a terrible job with the IP.