• potoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.worldEnglish
    25·
    2 days ago

    In her sadness, it seemed as if even her beautiful, beloved boobs bounced a little less boobily as she jiggled down the stairs…

  • MissJinx@lemmy.worldEnglish
    54·
    3 days ago

    as a woman I can confirm that’s how I spend my days. Very sad. Wish I could be hand washing some underwear and the dishes for a man. Oh well… we can’t all have everything

        • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.netEnglish
          53·
          3 days ago

          I’ve learned that waxing (sugaring, actually) hits the exact same mechanism in my brain as SI, without leaving scars, and leaves me with nice smooth skin that’s well exfoliated. Only problem is that I’m a guy, and people think it’s weird that I sugar my entire body. But OMG, the relief. I intentionally don’t do everything at once, so that I can sugar at least once a week if I want to, so I’ve always got that as an outlet.

    • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.ukEnglish
      7·
      3 days ago

      I see what you mean after looking at it for a while. Now it looks like a chicken wish bone shape leg to leg glued on to one large leg coming from her lower waist

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        33·
        3 days ago

        I am going to sort of lay into you here, not because I want to be a jerk, but because I think it’s important to post on public forums in advocacy of important steps in reasoning that I want to see society take.

        You see, every time someone calls something “ai slop”, and it isn’t, it’s a lot worse than just being wrong in one instance. It actually creates a compelling piece of evidence for exactly the opposite of the point you want to make. It’s a particularly damaging form of wrongness.

        You want to claim that what AI produces is intrinsically flawed, lesser than human works, and always bears the mark of its inferiority. You want to claim that human artwork is beautiful, superior, and always bears a mark of it. Roughly something like “the worst human artwork is better than the best AI slop”.

        But because you identified this human artwork (not just a random photograph even, but a still from a carefully directed successful TV show!) as “slop”, you must now either admit to one of these things:

        1. Some human artwork is as bad as AI imagery, which is equivalent to saying that some AI imagery is as good as human artwork.

        Or

        1. Some people cannot distinguish between human and AI imagery

        I think, in light of this, it’s time to move on from your current position, and instead take up a more nuanced one. Maybe consider that the problems with AI imagery are not about visual coherence, the presence of “soul” being put into it, or anything like that. You can still maintain the core view that AI imagery is bad, but you should come at it from a stronger argument, like the environmental impact, copyright violations, or something like that. This visual acuity argument is going the way of the dodo, and fast - as you and everyone else misclassifying real images as “slop” unintentionally demonstrate.