• whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    If it’s too close to the election they need to approve a bill through legislature that changes need to happen before a specific number of days before an election, otherwise they are just legislating from the bench pretending it’s legal. Which is obviously the case here because they can’t argue justifications for their racist bullshit in an open forum. “The government can break the law whenever it wants, what are you going to do about it” seems to be the SC opinion here.

  • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    The Supreme Kangaroo Court of the United States strikes again. It’s kind of amazing that out of 9 justices we have 2 avowed rapists, not to mention several christian nationalists.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I 100% blame the Democratic party for this. They’ve been assisting the Republicans in their efforts to create this court for the last 40 years. Thomas should never have been confirmed to the court and Ruth Bader Ginsberg hung on at a time when she should have left while the “liberal” dems controlled both the presidency and the Senate and could easily have replaced her with a(n at least mostly) liberal justice.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        With the benefit of hindsight we know RBJ should have stepped down sooner, but realistically the last opportunity was in 2014. Blaming her (and the democrats) entirely, but not blaming the republicians who blocked Obama’s nomination is like blaming an abuse survivor for what happened to them, and not the abuser.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I would still place some blame on Republicans for insisting on nominating sexual offenders, corrupt pieces of shit, etc. Yes the Dems should have done more to stop them, but i think the GOP should bear some responsibility for being sociopaths

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Blaming Republicans is like blaming a wolf for eating a chicken. It’s in their nature, it’s what they do. So no, I’m going to blame the farmer for allowing the wolf into the chicken coop in the first place.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    23 hours ago

    In a brief order, the conservative majority argued, among other things, that the District Court had intervened to block the maps too close to next year’s midterm election.

    Eleven months away is too close to the next election for these clowns.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The decision has nothing to do with their stated reasons; they are in favor of racism, but don’t want to say so

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Fuck that shit. They use this argument whenever it suits them. And what suits this fascist admin, suits the SCOTUS.

      Didn’t Trump himself appoint SCOTUS judges “too close” to the election? Clowns.

      • lukaro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You say that as if you expect republicans to have any sort of integrity, when they have shown time and time again they have zero integrity.

      • Thebular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Barrett, for starters. Nominated 38 days prior to the 2020 election, and confirmed just 8 days prior.

        • LordCrom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Remember, GOP blocked Obamas nomination for Judge because “its too close to an election and voters should decide”… McConnel, head of the hypocrites.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      19 hours ago

      But wouldn’t the opposite be true? Changing the maps too close to the election is a problem. “Keeping them the same too close to the election” makes no sense.

    • HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Dont forget 9 months is too close to an election to approve a supreme court justice nomination, unless the president is Republican and then less than a month is plenty of time

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Election was already underway. There were already absentee balls cast ousting him from office when they approved his nomination

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Same bullshit that Mitch McConnell claimed why Obama couldn’t appoint a Supreme Court justice fuck this illegmeaite Supreme Court.

        • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And then did a speed run to install a Supreme Court Justice like 45 days before an election under Trump.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No no, dont even give it that much dignity. The complainants are not asking to “block the map” too close (11 months) to elections. They are asking that the map not be illicit, unethically changed 5 years early, based off the explicit public request of the President who is not meant to have power over state election matters, with the explicitly stated intent of gerrymandering out more seats for Republicans that they “deserve” than they otherwise would have won, only 15ish months to the elections (which is apparently plenty of time). Their “reasoning” doesn’t make sense because it’s not reasoning. It’s blatant full chested support of voter suppression/disenfranchisement to bolster their party and their autocratic President. They’re so full of shit you could smell them talking from the next room over. Fuck those lying, cheating, corrupt, un-American, fascist cunts.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Texas passed their new maps on August 29th. On November 18 the district court ordered them to revert to their previous maps.

      Apparently the SC’s Republican cult members think this will be too difficult for Texas?

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Fellow being, this particular mask has been off ever since Donny the Destroyer appointed his cronies to be SCOTUS judges - “too close” to the election, btw.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    18 hours ago

    We should start calling it Robertsmander rather than Gerrymander from now on. If having no shame while he’s living has no effect, then the best he deserves is his name being tarnished and synonymous with corruption for hundreds of years.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Here’s the fun part. They’ll use the shadow docket and won’t give any rationale.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If that happens, nations around the globe should really wake up to the threat coming from the USA.

      …oh, who am I kidding…

    • DokPsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Does it even fucking matter at this point? There will be zero repercussions for the blatant disregard for the law to serve the authoritarian regime so they can say whatever they want

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, for real. Let’s hope the Majestic Imperious High Court deigns to grace us with any explanation. They love their emergency docket…

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m constantly questioning my sanity because everyone pretends the Untied States is still a functional, stable country. I know Canadians still choosing to live part time in the Untied States. Are they that unaware? Do they just not care? Even if they don’t care about other people, they should be questioning their own safety as non-citizens in Trump’s America. Why are so many people still acting like everything is normal?

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Unfortunately, not paying taxes isn’t really an option. If there’s one thing the government enjoys doing and does well is collect taxes, regardless of how failed that government is. The broken government is more likely to be extra shitty on the penalty though, unless you’re rich of course, in which case you don’t have to pay taxes.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I obviously disagree with this ruling, but if they were to rule the opposite on California, the absolute sheer corruptness would be undeniable. And worthily of drastic and dramatic action on our (the citizens) part.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Their sheer corruptness is already undeniable. The six right wing hacks regularly make decisions that are blatantly and obviously unconstitutional and write nonsense opinions to justify them. They openly accept huge bribes from those impacted by their decisions and then rule in their favor. If the GOP gave a damn about the rule of law and the Constitution they would have been impeached long ago.

      • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Citizens wouldn’t even vote in their own interest, and now it’s too late. I’m convinced tens of millions of Americans will die quietly before even one stands up.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          I’m inclined to agree, but I’ve seen signs of potential unrest.

          A household that has been decades gun free just got their sixth gun this year and a lot of ammo. Specifically citing a potential to stand their ground or die trying. We are talking about people who have lived 60 years without so much as a traffic ticket, never protesting anything, generally going along with things, now they they armed for talking a stand.

          Another mild mannered colleague that has been super peaceful and moderate is similarly talking about how “we” might have to violently fight. No idea what prep he might do, but his was the last voice I expected to hear say that.

          If people I’ve known to be very even keeled and moderate for decades are getting this close, I can’t imagine how close others are…

          I suppose we’ve been seeing the cracks start with two attempted trump assassinations and the Charlie Kirk assassination…

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Fascinating stuff! It’s like russia with extra steps and a gigantic amount of comical ostentatious posturing about freedoms and liberty.

    Americans do love their theatrics!