• PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    242
    ·
    4 days ago

    My mom keeps sending me AI videos of animals doing silly things. I tell her it’s AI every time.

    Her latest response: “Oh everything’s AI with you” and now she’s mad at me. We’re cooked.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      4 days ago

      These guys didn’t invest a trillion dollars into making fake cute animal videos for your grandmother. If these are the only customers they are getting they are completely fucked.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’re not. I know plenty of people irl who use Ai for everything.

        Even my father who’s extremely tech savvy and mechanically adept uses it for even the simplest questions.

        There are plenty of people that believe ai is an extremely useful tool.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          I really hope people remember why they don’t let you use a calculator in elementary school and apply that to AI.

          You need to know the fundamentals of the topic to make effective use of a tool. If you know nothing on the subject then you can’t instruct the tool correctly to produce a good product

        • Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m also extremely tech savvy (and working in IT for decades). While I sometimes use a llm for assistance the main reason of doing that sparsely is thst it’s a slippery slope. You never know when a hallucination might hit you.

          So basically misinformation silently crawls in. I don’t want that to happen.

            • Strider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              A little out of context. Although tech is my life, it’s never been social media or things like that.

              So in a way I am very much permanently touching grass (had to look that up / language barrier).

              The psychological issue with llm and hallucination is that humans lose the ability to judge the output, whether you touch grass in between or not.

              Verifying all output is almost impossible and at scope completely defeats the purpose.

        • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, when you don’t know a field it help. Your no expert by you can get things done. Technical debt is a later problem.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        There have already been scams involving stealing a phone, finding the phone owners grandmother in contacts, and using AI-generated videos and images to pretend like they’re holding her granddaughter hostage and getting her to pay.

        All the advantages of kidnapping for random with a fraction of the risk.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ouch, that stings. Like the time my coworkers labeled me IT illiterate because I had logged into the work laptop with a different account (and nobody remembered what the usual login was).

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      Has anyone figured out how money is being made from these shitty videos? There are so many of them and they have to be generating revenue for someone.

  • hash@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lemmy’s refusal to accept AI content will become our greatest strength if we hold to it.

    • knexcar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      3 days ago

      But how can we really tell what’s AI content and enforce it? I feel like there’s only these tiny tell tales that are getting harder and harder to spot. It’s gotten to the point that legitimate content (certain writing styles and images) are getting “called out” as AI even if the image has been around longer than DALL-E has.

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        When protecting our house from robbers, we just need more security than our neighbors.

        When running away from a bear, we just need to be faster than our friend.

        When reducing AI posts on a platform, we just need to call it out more than reddit.

        • zuana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Honestly if both lemmy and reddit can keep calling it out that would be great. Let 9gag become the toxic dumping ground.

      • umbrellacloud@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Hard to tell with writing, but most AI “art” is watermarked. Other AI can see the watermark. Humans can see it with tools. Google has a free one, so do many other sites.

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        But thats not mandatory. Maybe we ask the devs to make it optional and mods make it mandatory. (Old reddit move)

  • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    4 days ago

    God I wish this were true. People will so rarely give something up if they’re used to it. My guess is that this person evangelizes privacy and technical literacy to their mom, due to their bsky handle.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      I still have my facebook account because it’s needed for some very specific things (such as local groups and businesses that use it for mass communication), but I rarely ever open it unless I need to check something very specific. Even then, it is so easy to accidentally start doomscrolling once that page opens. I’ll see an update from an old friend, so I’ll scroll down and there’s someone making some recipe or some shit, I’ll keep scrolling, looking for that next friend update, but nope, there’s some woodworking video, or resin pour… next thing I know I’m zoned out watching some video where someone is cutting up a shoe and using it as an overly complex way of solving something that isn’t a problem. That’s usually the point where I snap out of it and hate myself for falling into the trap again.

      • huppakee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t use FB myself, but a dutch org took Meta to court because eu law states users should be able to select a preferred view (algorithm vs chronological). They implemented this for the eu last year, but it conveniently forgets your setting after you leave the page. The org won, so since the last hour of 2025 users in the Netherlands only have to select once and they remember your preference. It works on IG (which i do use), so i assume it works for FB too. In that case, you could vpn through a dutch server and get rid of this nasty algorithm view. But maybe Meta doesn’t want you to do this and built a fix before they released the dutch version.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah. I know many other people in that age bracket who send “cute pictures” that are, at least to me, clearly generated. They even send physical cards for holidays and birthdays with similar shit on them. It makes me sad to think that even people who create art for and design greeting cards are getting fucked by AI.

  • Wigglesworth@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    My mom never thinks about reality in any self-aware context and legitimately believes she has a hard-line directly to Stevie Nicks and megachurch preachers.

    I quit trying.

    • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I’m just gonna bet that the OP statement doesn’t represent anywhere near enough of the general experience. I knew I had lost the battle with my mom when she shared that video of a girl holding a 4ft snowy owl, and when I told her that animal doesn’t exist she responded “You don’t know everything!”

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Same. The tweet (or whatever the blue sky version of that) is wishful thinking.

      I know too many old folks who love AI slop. Everything from watching fake puppies save fake kittens from a fire to uploading their old photos and have AI turn it into a video.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      My dad has told me that Simon Cowell has died 3 times in the last year… he’s addicted to AI slop

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    One of the main reasons that there is an “AI gold rush” is that tech CEOs, billionaires, and oligarchs see the possibilities it creates for inventing reality and coercing large populations. I’ve long been concerned with not just how social media influences reality, but how people treat the entire digital experience as reality. Too much significance is ascribed to what amounts to flittering colors on a screen. Information drives action; garbage in, garbage out.

    “Boomers” are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to a lack of social media literacy. In developing countries where social media means the only path to Internet access, commerce, or external support, media literacy is at best a non-sequiter and at worst non-existent:

    Abstract: Facebook contributed to a genocide in Myanmar. Scholars, reporters, and United Nations investigators agree that the social media giant played a role in an explosion of ethnic conflict in 2017 that led to the death and displacement of hundreds of thousands Rohingya Muslims in Northern Myanmar

    https://systemicjustice.org/article/facebook-and-genocide-how-facebook-contributed-to-genocide-in-myanmar-and-why-it-will-not-be-held-accountable/

    Web 3.0 crashed hard, and the Internet monoliths have gone all in on AI as the next frontier of the Internet. And like the frontier of space, there is a massive wall of killer junk blocking the path and it seems like the only way forward is to launch more junk up there. I just hope we hit saturation before we’re all killed by falling debris.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because 99.99% of people won’t even consider doing that?

    Hell a good portion of modern society would legitimately go into withdrawals if they had to delete social media.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Social media companies forget the Important Thing. People only use social media to connect to people. Once they don’t feel like they are getting that, they won’t stick around just for the distraction.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Distraction is a much more competitive space. Human connection is the one area where social media has an edge. AI content, spam, bot users, etc. erode the basic trust and feeling of connection.

        As it gets harder to avoid those, people will seek distraction elsewhere. No one likes being embarrassed.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think you underestimate the inertia of the masses too. It takes a hell of a lot to get people to willingly jump ship, especially old people who are a very large portion of FB users.

          I think it’s easy to think that the general population has the same mindset as Lemmy users on this, but the vast majority of people just don’t care enough to disrupt their habits.

          I’d be happy to be proven wrong and this kills FB, but I won’t be holding my breath.

    • RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Facebook stopped serving me content about my friends some time around 2014, I stopped using it at this point, but it gained 1.68 billion new users since then.

  • halfsalesman@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This is a problem for all social media. Eventually every social media site that allows users to post anything will be bombarded to a degree that it will be impossible to find humans. It will be functionally impossible to moderate. And outside of that there will be whole ecosystems of fake AI generated websites will pop up with scams and propaganda. The internet will become a trash fire and people will have no choice but to eat the burning trash or touch grass.

    People who were comfortable never leaving their house other than for work will either become schizophrenic zombies or will get cabin fever and desperately seek connection offline.

    EDIT: And I say this as someone who doesn’t intrinsically hate AI.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wish this was my mother’s thinking. On the contrary, she and other relatives her age keep sending me slop they consider hilarious or interesting. You guessed, it’s neither.