awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
You@feddit.org to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 months ago

UK moves to ban smoking for everyone born after 2008

www.dw.com

external-link
message-square
23
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • globalnews@lemmy.zip
  • world@lemmy.world
159
external-link

UK moves to ban smoking for everyone born after 2008

www.dw.com

You@feddit.org to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 months ago
message-square
23
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • globalnews@lemmy.zip
  • world@lemmy.world
A draft law in the UK to create a "smoke-free generation" by banning smoking for anybody born after 2008 has cleared both houses of parliament. Only the king's signature remains for it to become law.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sure this will work as intended.

    • icerunner_origin@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      New black market incoming

    • Tarogar@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why work smart when you can work hard…

      • blinfabian@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        why work smart when you can work dumb by repeating old mistakes

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because Prohibition and the War on Drugs worked so well in the US, I guess?

  • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Some parts of this bill, increasing the places where vaping is not permitted in line with smoking, are very welcome.

    But bans of addictive substances only result in criminalising people who are addicted and putting them more at risk of harm, because now in addition to lung cancer they’ll have black market goons to deal with as well.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Smoking is already on a consistent, significant decline in the UK.

    Risking a black market (let’s be clear actually - definitely causing one) hardly seems worth a possible increased rate of decline.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    The best way to make cigarettes cool to kids is to make them fully illegal, this is a nonsense law unless you are trying to increase the amount of kids smoking cigarettes.

    • Chemo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      They already are illegal for kids. For them, nothing changes. Why would it be cooler for then? Is crack cooler then alcohol today?

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why would it be cooler for then?

        Because they just became more illegal.

  • SoupBrick@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    • You@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I gave the full title from the get go and haven’t changed it. But the preview is funny and maybe it will come to that.

      • SoupBrick@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        • You@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

  • oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Good 😊

  • darkmogool@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah… Criminalizing shit always works…

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why not just ban smoking?

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      If I were to guess, it’s because a blanket ban would turn the people who actually go out and vote against you.

      • tomenzgg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d’ve assumed the addiction factor. Forcing an addict to quit could cause stress that won’t be present for those who haven’t started, yet.

        But literally just a guess, on my part.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because of the existing addicts. It would create a black market.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because people don’t like to be told what to do. Why create a black market when there is already a steep and steady decline?

  • Pantherina (he)@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    What could go wrong when making laws depending on entire generations

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • chmod755@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Tell everyone that they’ll regret it at an early age

Europe@feddit.org

europe@feddit.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !europe@feddit.org

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don’t question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don’t post uncontextualized images or videos, and don’t start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they’re the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any “thinktank” type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don’t link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 689 users / day
  • 1.99K users / week
  • 4.84K users / month
  • 11.1K users / 6 months
  • 8 local subscribers
  • 11.9K subscribers
  • 11.3K Posts
  • 77.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • federal reverse@feddit.org
  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • !Europe Mod Team@feddit.org
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org